Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on neurodevelopmental outcomes of premature infants: a retrospective national cohort study.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002493
Tzu-Cheng Tseng, Teh-Ming Wang, Ya-Chi Hsu, Chung-Ting Hsu, Yi-Hsuan Lin, Ming-Chih Lin
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on neurodevelopmental outcomes of premature infants: a retrospective national cohort study.","authors":"Tzu-Cheng Tseng, Teh-Ming Wang, Ya-Chi Hsu, Chung-Ting Hsu, Yi-Hsuan Lin, Ming-Chih Lin","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Premature infants born in 2018 were assigned to the pre-pandemic group, while those born in 2019 were assigned to the during-pandemic group.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Nationwide cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Very low birthweight premature infants registered in the Taiwan Premature Infant Follow-up Network database.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Anti-epidemic measures, including quarantine and isolation protocols, social distancing, the closure of public spaces and restrictions on travel and gatherings during COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Outcomes were measured by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition at corrected ages of 6, 12 and 24 months old. Generalised estimating equation (GEE) was applied to incorporate all measurements into a single model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1939 premature infants who were enrolled, 985 developed before the pandemic, while 954 developed during the pandemic. Premature infants whose development occurred during the pandemic exhibited better cognitive composite at the corrected age of 6 months (beta=2.358; 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.65; p<0.001), and motor composite at corrected ages of 12 months (beta=1.680; 95% CI, 0.34 to 3.02; p=0.014). GEE analysis showed that infants who had grown during the pandemic achieved higher scores in cognitive composite (beta=1.416; 95% CI, 0.36 to 2.48; p=0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Premature infants in Taiwan who developed during the pandemic showed better neurodevelopment compared with those born before the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11149170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design: Premature infants born in 2018 were assigned to the pre-pandemic group, while those born in 2019 were assigned to the during-pandemic group.

Setting: Nationwide cohort study.

Patients: Very low birthweight premature infants registered in the Taiwan Premature Infant Follow-up Network database.

Interventions: Anti-epidemic measures, including quarantine and isolation protocols, social distancing, the closure of public spaces and restrictions on travel and gatherings during COVID-19 pandemic.

Main outcome measures: Outcomes were measured by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition at corrected ages of 6, 12 and 24 months old. Generalised estimating equation (GEE) was applied to incorporate all measurements into a single model.

Results: Among the 1939 premature infants who were enrolled, 985 developed before the pandemic, while 954 developed during the pandemic. Premature infants whose development occurred during the pandemic exhibited better cognitive composite at the corrected age of 6 months (beta=2.358; 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.65; p<0.001), and motor composite at corrected ages of 12 months (beta=1.680; 95% CI, 0.34 to 3.02; p=0.014). GEE analysis showed that infants who had grown during the pandemic achieved higher scores in cognitive composite (beta=1.416; 95% CI, 0.36 to 2.48; p=0.009).

Conclusion: Premature infants in Taiwan who developed during the pandemic showed better neurodevelopment compared with those born before the pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行对早产儿神经发育结果的影响:一项回顾性全国队列研究。
目的:比较 COVID-19 流行前和流行期间早产儿的神经发育结果:比较COVID-19大流行之前和期间早产儿的神经发育结果:2018年出生的早产儿被分配到大流行前组,而2019年出生的早产儿被分配到大流行期间组:全国性队列研究:台湾早产儿追踪网络数据库中登记的极低出生体重早产儿:干预措施:COVID-19大流行期间的防疫措施,包括检疫和隔离协议、社会疏离、关闭公共场所、限制旅行和聚会:主要结果测量:在 6 个月、12 个月和 24 个月大时,采用贝利婴幼儿发展量表第三版进行测量。应用广义估计方程(GEE)将所有测量结果纳入一个模型:在登记的 1939 名早产儿中,985 名在大流行前发育,954 名在大流行期间发育。在大流行期间发育的早产儿在 6 个月校正年龄时表现出更好的认知综合能力(beta=2.358;95% CI,1.07 至 3.65;p),而在大流行期间发育的早产儿在 6 个月校正年龄时表现出更好的认知综合能力(beta=2.358;95% CI,1.07 至 3.65;p):与大流行前出生的婴儿相比,在大流行期间发育的台湾早产儿的神经发育更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1