A systematic review of assisted and third-party reproduction guidelines regarding management and care of donors.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1186/s12978-024-01804-2
Elnaz Iranifard, Samira Ebrahimzadeh Zagami, Malihe Amirian, Hossein Ebrahimipour, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari
{"title":"A systematic review of assisted and third-party reproduction guidelines regarding management and care of donors.","authors":"Elnaz Iranifard, Samira Ebrahimzadeh Zagami, Malihe Amirian, Hossein Ebrahimipour, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari","doi":"10.1186/s12978-024-01804-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gamete and embryo donors face complex challenges affecting their health and quality of life. Healthcare providers need access to well-structured, evidence-based, and needs-based guidance to care for gamete and embryo donors. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to synthesize current assisted and third-party reproduction guidelines regarding management and care of donors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases of ISI, PubMed, Scopus, and websites of organizations related to the assisted reproduction were searched using the keywords of \"third party reproduction\", \"gamete donation\", \"embryo donation\", \"guidelines\", \"committee opinion\", and \"best practice\", without time limit up to July 2023. All the clinical or ethical guidelines and best practice statements regarding management and care for gamete and embryo donors written in the English language were included in the study. Quality assessment was carried using AGREE II tool. Included documents were reviewed and extracted data were narratively synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this systematic review 14 related documents were reviewed of which eight were guidelines, three were practice codes and three were committee opinions. Five documents were developed in the United States, three in Canada, two in the United Kingdom, one in Australia, and one in Australia and New Zealand. Also, two guidelines developed by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology were found. Management and care provided for donors were classified into four categories including screening, counseling, information provision, and ethical considerations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the current guidelines include some recommendations regarding the management and care of gamete/embryo donors in screening, counseling, information provision, and ethical considerations, nevertheless some shortcomings need to be addressed including donors' psychosocial needs, long-term effects of donation, donors' follow-up cares, and legal and human rights aspects of donation. Therefore, it is needed to conduct robust and well-designed research studies to fill the knowledge gap about gamete and embryo donors' needs, to inform current practices by developing evidence-based guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01804-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gamete and embryo donors face complex challenges affecting their health and quality of life. Healthcare providers need access to well-structured, evidence-based, and needs-based guidance to care for gamete and embryo donors. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to synthesize current assisted and third-party reproduction guidelines regarding management and care of donors.

Methods: The databases of ISI, PubMed, Scopus, and websites of organizations related to the assisted reproduction were searched using the keywords of "third party reproduction", "gamete donation", "embryo donation", "guidelines", "committee opinion", and "best practice", without time limit up to July 2023. All the clinical or ethical guidelines and best practice statements regarding management and care for gamete and embryo donors written in the English language were included in the study. Quality assessment was carried using AGREE II tool. Included documents were reviewed and extracted data were narratively synthesized.

Results: In this systematic review 14 related documents were reviewed of which eight were guidelines, three were practice codes and three were committee opinions. Five documents were developed in the United States, three in Canada, two in the United Kingdom, one in Australia, and one in Australia and New Zealand. Also, two guidelines developed by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology were found. Management and care provided for donors were classified into four categories including screening, counseling, information provision, and ethical considerations.

Conclusion: While the current guidelines include some recommendations regarding the management and care of gamete/embryo donors in screening, counseling, information provision, and ethical considerations, nevertheless some shortcomings need to be addressed including donors' psychosocial needs, long-term effects of donation, donors' follow-up cares, and legal and human rights aspects of donation. Therefore, it is needed to conduct robust and well-designed research studies to fill the knowledge gap about gamete and embryo donors' needs, to inform current practices by developing evidence-based guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对辅助生殖和第三方生殖指南中有关捐献者管理和护理的内容进行系统回顾。
背景:配子和胚胎捐献者面临着影响其健康和生活质量的复杂挑战。医疗服务提供者需要获得结构合理、以证据为基础、以需求为导向的指导,以护理配子和胚胎捐献者。因此,本系统性综述旨在综合目前有关捐献者管理和护理的辅助生殖和第三方生殖指南:方法:使用 "第三方生殖"、"配子捐献"、"胚胎捐献"、"指南"、"委员会意见 "和 "最佳实践 "等关键词在 ISI、PubMed、Scopus 等数据库以及辅助生殖相关组织的网站上进行检索,检索时间不受限制,截至 2023 年 7 月。所有以英语撰写的有关配子和胚胎捐献者管理和护理的临床或伦理指南和最佳实践声明均被纳入研究范围。使用 AGREE II 工具进行质量评估。对纳入的文件进行审查,并对提取的数据进行叙述性综合:本次系统性回顾共审查了 14 份相关文件,其中 8 份为指南,3 份为操作规范,3 份为委员会意见。五份文件由美国制定,三份由加拿大制定,两份由英国制定,一份由澳大利亚制定,一份由澳大利亚和新西兰制定。此外,还发现了欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会制定的两份指南。为捐献者提供的管理和护理分为四类,包括筛查、咨询、信息提供和伦理考虑:结论:尽管目前的指南在配子/胚胎捐献者的筛查、咨询、信息提供和伦理考虑方面提出了一些管理和护理建议,但仍有一些不足之处需要解决,包括捐献者的社会心理需求、捐献的长期影响、捐献者的后续护理以及捐献的法律和人权问题。因此,有必要开展稳健且设计良好的研究,以填补配子和胚胎捐献者需求方面的知识空白,并通过制定以证据为基础的指南,为当前的实践提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Burden of uterine cancer in China from 1990 to 2021 and 15-year projection: a systematic analysis and comparison with global levels. "I managed to stand on my own. I saved my baby's life.": qualitative analysis of birth experiences from women living with HIV in Cape Town, South Africa. Assessment of the impact an educational intervention on post-traumatic stress disorder and social cognitive theory constructs in women with sexual assault experience: a study protocol for a clinical trial. The reasons for and influences of unintended teenage pregnancy in Kericho county, Kenya: a qualitative study. Men's involvement in family planning programs: an exploratory study from Karachi, Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1