Child Temperament and Early Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Pediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2024-05-15
Swetha Sriram, Subhashree Sahoo, M S Muthu, M Kirthiga, Ankita Saikia, Lalitha Jairam, Umesh Wadgave, Robert Anthonappa
{"title":"Child Temperament and Early Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Swetha Sriram, Subhashree Sahoo, M S Muthu, M Kirthiga, Ankita Saikia, Lalitha Jairam, Umesh Wadgave, Robert Anthonappa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to assess current evidence for the association between child temperament and early childhood caries (ECC). <b>Methods:</b> A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE® through PubMed®, EMBASE®, Scopus®, LILACS, Web of Science™, and EBSCO up to January 2023. Studies measuring ECC and child temperament for children younger than or equal to six years of age using questionnaires, interviews, and surveys through case-control studies, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies were included. Literature reviews were excluded. Medical subject heading (MeSH) terms like \"temperament\" and \"dental caries\" were used by two authors who independently extracted the data, and a third author resolved disagreements. Risk of bias assessment was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa assessment scale for case-control and cohort studies and the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach (GRADE approach). A chi-square test and I-square index were used to evaluate heterogeneity. <b>Results:</b> A total of 5,072 records were screened, resulting in 15 included studies that yielded data for 6,667 participants; sevenstudies were high, and eight were of moderate quality. Seven studies qualified for meta-analysis, which revealed that persistence did not affectthe presence or absence of ECC. However, there was a strong association between difficult temperament and ECC (odds ratio equals 2.63). <b>Conclusion:</b> A positive association between a child's temperament and early childhood caries exists that is supported by quantitative findings, indicating a connection with very low certainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"46 3","pages":"169-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to assess current evidence for the association between child temperament and early childhood caries (ECC). Methods: A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE® through PubMed®, EMBASE®, Scopus®, LILACS, Web of Science™, and EBSCO up to January 2023. Studies measuring ECC and child temperament for children younger than or equal to six years of age using questionnaires, interviews, and surveys through case-control studies, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies were included. Literature reviews were excluded. Medical subject heading (MeSH) terms like "temperament" and "dental caries" were used by two authors who independently extracted the data, and a third author resolved disagreements. Risk of bias assessment was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa assessment scale for case-control and cohort studies and the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach (GRADE approach). A chi-square test and I-square index were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Results: A total of 5,072 records were screened, resulting in 15 included studies that yielded data for 6,667 participants; sevenstudies were high, and eight were of moderate quality. Seven studies qualified for meta-analysis, which revealed that persistence did not affectthe presence or absence of ECC. However, there was a strong association between difficult temperament and ECC (odds ratio equals 2.63). Conclusion: A positive association between a child's temperament and early childhood caries exists that is supported by quantitative findings, indicating a connection with very low certainty.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童气质与幼儿龋齿:系统回顾与元分析》。
目的:本研究旨在进行系统性回顾,评估儿童气质与儿童早期龋齿(ECC)之间关系的现有证据。方法: 使用 MEDLINE使用 MEDLINE®、PubMed®、EMBASE®、Scopus®、LILACS、Web of Science™ 和 EBSCO(截至 2023 年 1 月)进行系统检索。纳入的研究通过病例对照研究、队列研究和横断面研究,采用问卷、访谈和调查等方式对小于或等于六岁的儿童的幼儿保育和儿童气质进行了测量。不包括文献综述。医学主题词表(MeSH)中的 "气质 "和 "龋齿 "等术语由两位作者独立提取数据,第三位作者负责解决分歧。偏倚风险评估采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华病例对照和队列研究评估量表以及横断面研究评估工具(AXIS)进行。证据质量采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE 法)进行评估。采用卡方检验和 I 方指数评估异质性。结果:共筛选了 5,072 条记录,最终纳入了 15 项研究,为 6,667 名参与者提供了数据;其中 7 项研究的质量较高,8 项研究的质量中等。七项研究符合荟萃分析的条件,荟萃分析表明,持续性并不影响ECC的存在与否。然而,性情暴躁与 ECC 之间存在密切联系(几率比为 2.63)。结论儿童的性情与儿童早期龋齿之间存在正相关,并得到了定量研究结果的支持,这表明两者之间的联系具有很低的确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Analysis of Responses of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Special Needs Dentistry. Adopting The D3 Group's Translational Paradigm for Molar Hypomineralization and Chalky Teeth. Assessment of Oral Hygiene and Gingivitis in Adolescents With and Without Cystic Fibrosis. Association of Parental Divorce With Oral Health in U.S. Children and Adolescents. Comparison of Compressive Strength Between Traditional and Novel Open-Faced Stainless Steel Crowns Filled With Different Restorative Materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1