Microleakage of Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Technique (SMART) Restorations Using Silver Diammine Fluoride and High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer.

Pediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2024-05-15
Jordan Dunn Powell, Corey Acosta, Martha H Wells, Brian R Morrow, Craig V Vinall, Franklin Garcia-Godoy
{"title":"Microleakage of Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Technique (SMART) Restorations Using Silver Diammine Fluoride and High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer.","authors":"Jordan Dunn Powell, Corey Acosta, Martha H Wells, Brian R Morrow, Craig V Vinall, Franklin Garcia-Godoy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to investigate the microleakage of atraumatic glass ionomer restorations with and without silver diammine fluoride (SDF) application. Restorations with SDF are termed silver-modified atraumatic restorations (SMART). <b>Methods:</b> Sixty carious extracted permanent teeth were randomly allocated to two SMART groups and two control groups (n equals 15 per group) for a total of four groups. After selective caries removal, test specimens were treated with 38 percent SDF and polyacrylic acid conditioner was applied and rinsed; teeth were restored with Fuji IX GP® glass ionomer (n equals 15) or with SMART Advantage™ glass ionomer (SAGI; n equals 15). For control groups, specimens were restored with their respective GI material after selective caries removal, both without SDF. Restored teeth were placed in Dulbecco's Phosphate-Buffered Saline solution at 37 degrees Celsius for 24 hours. Teeth were thermocycled between five and 55 degrees Celsius for 1,000 cycles, stained with two percent basic fuchsin, sectioned, and visually inspected for microleakage utilizing stereomicroscopy on a four-point scale. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks using Dunn's method (P<0.05). <b>Results:</b> Microleakage between the two SMART restoration groups was insignificant. SAGI alone demonstrated significantly more microleakage than all other groups. There was no statistical significance between the Fuji IX GP® control group and the two SMART restoration groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> This in vitro study indicated that silver diammine fluoride placed before glass ionomer restoration does not increase microleakage. Polyacrylic acid may be used after SDF placement without increasing microleakage.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"46 3","pages":"204-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the microleakage of atraumatic glass ionomer restorations with and without silver diammine fluoride (SDF) application. Restorations with SDF are termed silver-modified atraumatic restorations (SMART). Methods: Sixty carious extracted permanent teeth were randomly allocated to two SMART groups and two control groups (n equals 15 per group) for a total of four groups. After selective caries removal, test specimens were treated with 38 percent SDF and polyacrylic acid conditioner was applied and rinsed; teeth were restored with Fuji IX GP® glass ionomer (n equals 15) or with SMART Advantage™ glass ionomer (SAGI; n equals 15). For control groups, specimens were restored with their respective GI material after selective caries removal, both without SDF. Restored teeth were placed in Dulbecco's Phosphate-Buffered Saline solution at 37 degrees Celsius for 24 hours. Teeth were thermocycled between five and 55 degrees Celsius for 1,000 cycles, stained with two percent basic fuchsin, sectioned, and visually inspected for microleakage utilizing stereomicroscopy on a four-point scale. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks using Dunn's method (P<0.05). Results: Microleakage between the two SMART restoration groups was insignificant. SAGI alone demonstrated significantly more microleakage than all other groups. There was no statistical significance between the Fuji IX GP® control group and the two SMART restoration groups. Conclusions: This in vitro study indicated that silver diammine fluoride placed before glass ionomer restoration does not increase microleakage. Polyacrylic acid may be used after SDF placement without increasing microleakage.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用二胺氟化银和高粘度玻璃离子聚合物的银改性无创修复技术(SMART)修复体的微渗漏。
目的:本研究的目的是调查使用和未使用二胺氟化银(SDF)的非创伤性玻璃离聚体修复体的微渗漏情况。含 SDF 的修复体被称为银改性非创伤性修复体 (SMART)。方法:将 60 颗龋坏的拔出恒牙随机分配到两个 SMART 组和两个对照组(每组 15 人),共四组。选择性去除龋齿后,用 38% 的 SDF 处理测试样本,然后涂上聚丙烯酸护理剂并冲洗;用富士 IX GP® 玻璃离聚体(n 等于 15)或 SMART Advantage™ 玻璃离聚体(SAGI;n 等于 15)修复牙齿。对照组的标本在选择性去除龋齿后使用各自的 GI 材料进行修复,均不使用 SDF。将修复后的牙齿放入 37 摄氏度的杜氏磷酸盐缓冲盐溶液中 24 小时。在 5 至 55 摄氏度之间对牙齿进行 1,000 次热循环,用 2% 的碱性紫红素染色,切片,并使用立体显微镜以四点刻度目测微渗漏情况。数据采用 Kruskal-Wallis 单因子方差分析和 Dunn 方法进行统计分析(PResults:两个 SMART 修复组之间的微渗漏不显著。仅 SAGI 一组的微渗漏率明显高于其他各组。富士 IX GP® 对照组和两个 SMART 修复组之间没有统计学意义。结论:这项体外研究表明,在玻璃离聚体修复体之前放置二胺氟化银不会增加微渗漏。聚丙烯酸可以在 SDF 放置后使用,而不会增加微渗漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Analysis of Responses of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Special Needs Dentistry. Adopting The D3 Group's Translational Paradigm for Molar Hypomineralization and Chalky Teeth. Assessment of Oral Hygiene and Gingivitis in Adolescents With and Without Cystic Fibrosis. Association of Parental Divorce With Oral Health in U.S. Children and Adolescents. Comparison of Compressive Strength Between Traditional and Novel Open-Faced Stainless Steel Crowns Filled With Different Restorative Materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1