Provision of Pediatric Dental Services by Pediatric Dentists Versus General Dentists: Secondary Dental Analysis of Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys.

IF 1.7 Pediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2024-05-15
Affan Ghaffari, Russell F Bradbury, Jeffrey Harman
{"title":"Provision of Pediatric Dental Services by Pediatric Dentists Versus General Dentists: Secondary Dental Analysis of Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys.","authors":"Affan Ghaffari, Russell F Bradbury, Jeffrey Harman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of the study was to determine whether visiting only a pediatric dentist (as opposed to visiting only a general dentist) was associated with the provision of preventive dental services for a U.S.-based pediatric population (those 18 years and younger). <b>Methods:</b> This study analyzed pooled Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data from 2018 and 2019 to compare the use of certain preventive dental services (i.e., examination, radiographs, prophylaxis, dental sealant, and fluoride treatment) among those who reported visiting a pediatric dentist versus those who visited a general dentist. Survey procedures were used in Stata 14.0 to perform multivariable logistic regression analyses. <b>Results:</b> Controlling for demographic and insurance variables, children who visited only pediatric dentists had statistically significantly greater odds of receiving radiographs (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] equals 1.22; 95 percent confidence interval [95% CI] equals 1.01 to 1.48; P=0.04), fluoride treatment (AOR equals 1.57; 95% CI equals 1.30 to 1.90; P≤0.001), and sealants (AOR equals 1.63; 95% CI equals 1.24 to 2.16; P=0.001) compared to children who visited only general dentists. There was no statistically significant difference in the provision of periodic examinations and prophylaxis services. <b>Conclusion:</b> Based on the nationally representative data evaluated, pediatric dentists are more likely to provide more optimal preventive services than general dentists (i.e., radiographs, fluoride treatments, and sealants) to children in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"46 3","pages":"179-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine whether visiting only a pediatric dentist (as opposed to visiting only a general dentist) was associated with the provision of preventive dental services for a U.S.-based pediatric population (those 18 years and younger). Methods: This study analyzed pooled Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data from 2018 and 2019 to compare the use of certain preventive dental services (i.e., examination, radiographs, prophylaxis, dental sealant, and fluoride treatment) among those who reported visiting a pediatric dentist versus those who visited a general dentist. Survey procedures were used in Stata 14.0 to perform multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: Controlling for demographic and insurance variables, children who visited only pediatric dentists had statistically significantly greater odds of receiving radiographs (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] equals 1.22; 95 percent confidence interval [95% CI] equals 1.01 to 1.48; P=0.04), fluoride treatment (AOR equals 1.57; 95% CI equals 1.30 to 1.90; P≤0.001), and sealants (AOR equals 1.63; 95% CI equals 1.24 to 2.16; P=0.001) compared to children who visited only general dentists. There was no statistically significant difference in the provision of periodic examinations and prophylaxis services. Conclusion: Based on the nationally representative data evaluated, pediatric dentists are more likely to provide more optimal preventive services than general dentists (i.e., radiographs, fluoride treatments, and sealants) to children in the United States.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科牙医与普通牙医提供的儿科牙科服务:医疗支出小组调查的二级牙科分析。
目的:本研究旨在确定只看儿童牙医(而不是只看普通牙医)是否与为美国儿童(18 岁及以下)提供预防性牙科服务有关。方法:本研究分析了2018年和2019年的医疗支出小组调查汇总数据,以比较那些报告看了儿科牙医和看了普通牙医的人对某些预防性牙科服务(即检查、拍片、预防、牙齿密封剂和氟化物治疗)的使用情况。调查程序使用 Stata 14.0 进行多变量逻辑回归分析。结果如下在控制人口统计学和保险变量的情况下,只看儿童牙医的儿童接受放射摄影的几率在统计学上明显更高(调整后的几率比 [AOR] 等于 1.22;95% 置信区间 [95% CI] 等于 1.01至1.48;P=0.04)、氟化物治疗(AOR等于1.57;95% CI等于1.30至1.90;P≤0.001)和密封剂(AOR等于1.63;95% CI等于1.24至2.16;P=0.001)。在提供定期检查和预防服务方面,没有明显的统计学差异。结论根据所评估的具有全国代表性的数据,与普通牙医相比,儿科牙医更有可能为美国儿童提供更理想的预防服务(即射线照相、氟化物治疗和密封剂)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding Pulp Response to Inflammation in Primary Teeth and its Clinical Implications. Abstract of the Scientific Literature. Parent Perceptions of Animal-Assisted Therapy for Pediatric Dental Patients with Special Health Care Needs: A Pilot Survey Study. Critical analysis of the article: "Management of Luxated Permanent Incisors: A Study Between Orthodontic and Digital Repositioning". Association of Bifid Mandibular Canal With Developmental Dental Anomalies and Pathologies in Children: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1