{"title":"Quality of teaching & learning in higher education: a bibliometric review & future research agenda","authors":"Priya Chaudhary, Reetesh K. Singh","doi":"10.1108/oth-06-2023-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to visualize and map the emerging themes in the field of quality of teaching and learning in higher education.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study uses a bibliometric approach to review studies published between 2000 and 2021. The leading trends in authorship, publications and countries were analyzed using the Web of Science database.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The analysis reveals four distinct clusters: quality, teaching and learning, supportive environment and learning outcomes. The literature in the field is lop-sided, and many issues still need to be addressed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>While bibliometric analysis has achieved significant recognition among academicians, this study was restricted to the data set provided by Web of Science. In addition, the analysis covers a specific time frame and may not capture recent developments in the field. Future research should address these limitations and consider expanding the sample size and incorporating more diverse methodologies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The findings have implications for practitioners, policymakers and researchers. Practitioners can benefit from the identified core authors’ work and access evidence-based practices to enhance the quality of teaching and learning in their institutions. Policymakers can use the research findings to inform policymaking processes and develop robust quality assurance frameworks. Researchers can build upon the identified clusters and core authors’ work to address research gaps and advance knowledge in the field.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study contributes to the existing literature by providing a comprehensive bibliometric review of the quality of teaching and learning in higher education. Identifying clusters and core authors offers a systematic overview of the significant themes and influential figures within the field. This research provides a foundation for further exploration and understanding of quality in higher education.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47013,"journal":{"name":"On the Horizon","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"On the Horizon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oth-06-2023-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to visualize and map the emerging themes in the field of quality of teaching and learning in higher education.
Design/methodology/approach
This study uses a bibliometric approach to review studies published between 2000 and 2021. The leading trends in authorship, publications and countries were analyzed using the Web of Science database.
Findings
The analysis reveals four distinct clusters: quality, teaching and learning, supportive environment and learning outcomes. The literature in the field is lop-sided, and many issues still need to be addressed.
Research limitations/implications
While bibliometric analysis has achieved significant recognition among academicians, this study was restricted to the data set provided by Web of Science. In addition, the analysis covers a specific time frame and may not capture recent developments in the field. Future research should address these limitations and consider expanding the sample size and incorporating more diverse methodologies.
Practical implications
The findings have implications for practitioners, policymakers and researchers. Practitioners can benefit from the identified core authors’ work and access evidence-based practices to enhance the quality of teaching and learning in their institutions. Policymakers can use the research findings to inform policymaking processes and develop robust quality assurance frameworks. Researchers can build upon the identified clusters and core authors’ work to address research gaps and advance knowledge in the field.
Originality/value
This study contributes to the existing literature by providing a comprehensive bibliometric review of the quality of teaching and learning in higher education. Identifying clusters and core authors offers a systematic overview of the significant themes and influential figures within the field. This research provides a foundation for further exploration and understanding of quality in higher education.
本研究采用文献计量学方法,对 2000 年至 2021 年间发表的研究进行了回顾。研究结果分析揭示了四个不同的集群:质量、教学、支持性环境和学习成果。尽管文献计量学分析已得到学术界的广泛认可,但本研究仅限于 Web of Science 提供的数据集。此外,该分析涵盖了特定的时间范围,可能无法捕捉到该领域的最新发展。未来的研究应解决这些局限性,并考虑扩大样本量和采用更多样化的方法。从业人员可以从确定的核心作者的工作中获益,并获得循证实践,以提高其所在机构的教学质量。政策制定者可以利用研究成果为政策制定过程提供信息,并制定强有力的质量保证框架。本研究通过对高等教育教学质量进行全面的文献计量学回顾,为现有文献做出了贡献。通过确定集群和核心作者,系统地概述了该领域的重要主题和有影响力的人物。这项研究为进一步探索和理解高等教育质量奠定了基础。
期刊介绍:
On the Horizon provides an insight into how the changing face of technology is making it possible for educational institutions to form new relationships across geographic and cultural boundaries.