Jinwei Bai, Meiliang Mao, Yankai Ma, Zhen-Guo Yan, Yaobing Min
{"title":"Simplified weighting formulations of weighted compact nonlinear schemes for compressible flows","authors":"Jinwei Bai, Meiliang Mao, Yankai Ma, Zhen-Guo Yan, Yaobing Min","doi":"10.1002/fld.5311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Weighted compact nonlinear schemes (WCNSs) are a popular family of high-resolution shock-capturing schemes for simulating compressible flows, of which the nonlinear interpolation procedure is dominant for the performance. In this work, a simplified weighting strategy is introduced for the nonlinear interpolation procedure. Firstly, an equivalent weighting formulation of WCNS is presented by explicitly including the whole-point stencil into the set of candidate stencils. Secondly, motivated by the reorganization of WCNS, the WCNS-CU6 scheme is achieved in a more straightforward way. Thirdly, by introducing a TENO selection procedure in the framework of WCNS-CU6-Simplified, a TCNS6-Simplified scheme is proposed, the resolution of which is comparable with the excellent TENO6 scheme, while the computational cost is much lower. The simplified schemes exhibit more outstanding, at least comparable, fidelity than the original schemes, however, with superior characteristics in terms of efficiency and simplicity. A variety of benchmark test problems are studied to demonstrate the behaviour of the simplified weighting strategy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"96 9","pages":"1592-1616"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Weighted compact nonlinear schemes (WCNSs) are a popular family of high-resolution shock-capturing schemes for simulating compressible flows, of which the nonlinear interpolation procedure is dominant for the performance. In this work, a simplified weighting strategy is introduced for the nonlinear interpolation procedure. Firstly, an equivalent weighting formulation of WCNS is presented by explicitly including the whole-point stencil into the set of candidate stencils. Secondly, motivated by the reorganization of WCNS, the WCNS-CU6 scheme is achieved in a more straightforward way. Thirdly, by introducing a TENO selection procedure in the framework of WCNS-CU6-Simplified, a TCNS6-Simplified scheme is proposed, the resolution of which is comparable with the excellent TENO6 scheme, while the computational cost is much lower. The simplified schemes exhibit more outstanding, at least comparable, fidelity than the original schemes, however, with superior characteristics in terms of efficiency and simplicity. A variety of benchmark test problems are studied to demonstrate the behaviour of the simplified weighting strategy.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction.
Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review.
The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.