Journalists’ authority and its bounded trade; Twitter, journalists, and boundary work in contemporary France’s music scene

IF 2.7 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journalism Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1177/14648849241255941
Gilles Bastin, Clément Bert-Erboul
{"title":"Journalists’ authority and its bounded trade; Twitter, journalists, and boundary work in contemporary France’s music scene","authors":"Gilles Bastin, Clément Bert-Erboul","doi":"10.1177/14648849241255941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Journalists, it is widely admitted, are engaged in new forms of boundary work on social media platforms, seeking to uphold their influence over news dissemination. This study focuses on music festivals as a case study to examine journalists' endeavors in maintaining their authority on social media. We analyze Twitter coverage of music festivals in France during the summer of 2018, systematically collecting data from 16 festivals of varying sizes and musical genres. Through this analysis, we investigate journalists' engagement and evaluate the trading of authority with other stakeholders through mentioning practices. Our findings challenge the prevailing notion of journalists as primary arbiters of authority on social media platforms. Despite their conspicuous presence during music festivals on Twitter, journalists emerge as relatively passive participants compared to other stakeholders in the music scene. Moreover, their ability to assert or receive authority from the broader public sphere is limited. This study sheds light on the bounded nature of journalists' boundary work on social media platforms, emphasizing the evolving dynamics of authority within digital information ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":51432,"journal":{"name":"Journalism","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241255941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Journalists, it is widely admitted, are engaged in new forms of boundary work on social media platforms, seeking to uphold their influence over news dissemination. This study focuses on music festivals as a case study to examine journalists' endeavors in maintaining their authority on social media. We analyze Twitter coverage of music festivals in France during the summer of 2018, systematically collecting data from 16 festivals of varying sizes and musical genres. Through this analysis, we investigate journalists' engagement and evaluate the trading of authority with other stakeholders through mentioning practices. Our findings challenge the prevailing notion of journalists as primary arbiters of authority on social media platforms. Despite their conspicuous presence during music festivals on Twitter, journalists emerge as relatively passive participants compared to other stakeholders in the music scene. Moreover, their ability to assert or receive authority from the broader public sphere is limited. This study sheds light on the bounded nature of journalists' boundary work on social media platforms, emphasizing the evolving dynamics of authority within digital information ecosystems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记者的权威及其受约束的行业;推特、记者和当代法国音乐界的边界工作
人们普遍承认,新闻记者在社交媒体平台上从事着新形式的边界工作,力图维护自己对新闻传播的影响力。本研究以音乐节为案例,探讨记者在社交媒体上维护自身权威的努力。我们分析了2018年夏季法国音乐节的推特报道,系统地收集了16个不同规模和音乐类型的音乐节的数据。通过分析,我们调查了记者的参与情况,并评估了通过提及实践与其他利益相关者进行权威交易的情况。我们的研究结果对记者在社交媒体平台上作为主要权威仲裁者的普遍观念提出了质疑。尽管记者在音乐节期间在 Twitter 上的存在十分显眼,但与音乐场景中的其他利益相关者相比,他们是相对被动的参与者。此外,他们从更广泛的公共领域主张或接受权威的能力也很有限。本研究揭示了记者在社交媒体平台上的边界工作的限制性,强调了数字信息生态系统中不断演变的权威动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journalism
Journalism COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Journalism is a major international, peer-reviewed journal that provides a dedicated forum for articles from the growing community of academic researchers and critical practitioners with an interest in journalism. The journal is interdisciplinary and publishes both theoretical and empirical work and contributes to the social, economic, political, cultural and practical understanding of journalism. It includes contributions on current developments and historical changes within journalism.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge can wait? The epistemic conversion of new beat reporters Behind the black box: The moderating role of the machine heuristic on the effect of transparency information about automated journalism on hostile media bias perception Citizen journalism revisited: A case study of Kenya’s kibera news network (De)politicization of the environmental agenda in Russian media Why media platforms police the boundaries of impartiality: A comparative analysis of television news and fact-checking in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1