Digital access and learning outcomes: a study of equity and inclusivity in distance education

Abhinandan Kulal, Sahana Dinesh, N. Abhishek, Ajaya Anchan
{"title":"Digital access and learning outcomes: a study of equity and inclusivity in distance education","authors":"Abhinandan Kulal, Sahana Dinesh, N. Abhishek, Ajaya Anchan","doi":"10.1108/ijem-03-2024-0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The transformative impact of digital innovations on education has reshaped academic landscapes, affecting both instructional methods and evaluation systems. This study delves into the realm of distance education, exploring the intricate dynamics of digital access, equity and inclusivity, with a particular focus on their influence on learning outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A comprehensive survey involving 360 participants was conducted to gather data on various facets of the digital learning environment. Descriptive statistics illuminated participants' perceptions, while digital access disparities were analyzed through a chi-square test. Structural equation modelling (SEM) assessed direct relationships, mediation and moderation analyses and elucidated the nuanced influence of demographic parameters.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Descriptive analysis revealed generally positive perceptions of digital learning, with some variability in aspects like accessibility of learning materials and Internet connectivity. Digital access disparities were evident across demographic parameters, highlighting significant associations with gender, education, income, geographic location, religious affiliation and field of study. SEM indicated robust positive associations between digital access and learning outcomes, strategies for enhancing equity and inclusivity and their combined impact on overall academic success.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study contributes original insights by comprehensively analyzing the interplay of digital access, equity and inclusivity in distance education and their impact on learning outcomes. The research unveils nuanced disparities across demographic dimensions, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. The study’s integration of SEM, mediation and moderation analyses adds a sophisticated layer to the understanding of these relationships.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Management","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-03-2024-0166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The transformative impact of digital innovations on education has reshaped academic landscapes, affecting both instructional methods and evaluation systems. This study delves into the realm of distance education, exploring the intricate dynamics of digital access, equity and inclusivity, with a particular focus on their influence on learning outcomes.

Design/methodology/approach

A comprehensive survey involving 360 participants was conducted to gather data on various facets of the digital learning environment. Descriptive statistics illuminated participants' perceptions, while digital access disparities were analyzed through a chi-square test. Structural equation modelling (SEM) assessed direct relationships, mediation and moderation analyses and elucidated the nuanced influence of demographic parameters.

Findings

Descriptive analysis revealed generally positive perceptions of digital learning, with some variability in aspects like accessibility of learning materials and Internet connectivity. Digital access disparities were evident across demographic parameters, highlighting significant associations with gender, education, income, geographic location, religious affiliation and field of study. SEM indicated robust positive associations between digital access and learning outcomes, strategies for enhancing equity and inclusivity and their combined impact on overall academic success.

Originality/value

This study contributes original insights by comprehensively analyzing the interplay of digital access, equity and inclusivity in distance education and their impact on learning outcomes. The research unveils nuanced disparities across demographic dimensions, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. The study’s integration of SEM, mediation and moderation analyses adds a sophisticated layer to the understanding of these relationships.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字接入和学习成果:远程教育的公平性和包容性研究
目的 数字创新对教育的变革性影响重塑了学术景观,对教学方法和评价体系都产生了影响。本研究深入远程教育领域,探索数字接入、公平性和包容性的复杂动态,尤其关注它们对学习成果的影响。 设计/方法/途径 开展了一项涉及 360 名参与者的综合调查,以收集有关数字学习环境各个方面的数据。描述性统计说明了参与者的看法,同时通过卡方检验分析了数字访问的差异。结构方程模型(SEM)评估了直接关系、中介和调节分析,并阐明了人口统计参数的细微影响。研究结果描述性分析表明,人们对数字化学习的看法总体上是积极的,但在学习材料的可及性和互联网连接等方面存在一些差异。在不同的人口统计参数中,数字化学习的差异是显而易见的,这突出表现在与性别、教育、收入、地理位置、宗教信仰和学习领域的显著关联上。SEM 表明,数字接入与学习成果、提高公平性和包容性的策略以及它们对总体学术成功的综合影响之间存在着强有力的正相关。 原创性/价值 本研究通过全面分析远程教育中数字接入、公平性和包容性的相互作用及其对学习成果的影响,提出了独到的见解。研究揭示了各人口维度之间存在的细微差别,强调了采取有针对性干预措施的必要性。研究整合了 SEM、中介和调节分析,为理解这些关系增加了一个复杂的层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Management (IJEM) provides those interested in the effective management of the educational process with a broad overview of developments and best practice in the field, with particular reference to how new ideas can be applied worldwide. As the whole structure and philosophy of education goes through a sea-change, and as budgets are cut, educational managers need to keep abreast of new developments in order to maximize their resources and determine the most appropriate management strategy for their institution. The journal explores research in the following areas: -Innovation in educational management across the spectrum -The development of educational delivery mechanisms -Creation of an environment in which the management of resources provides the most efficient outputs -Sharing of new initiatives, with an international application The International Journal of Educational Management addresses the increasingly complex role of the educational manager, offering international perspectives on common problems and providing a forum for the sharing of ideas, information and expertise.
期刊最新文献
Hall of mirrors to enhance a network professional learning community for ECEC centre leaders Impact of service quality, relational trust and attitude on the intention to pursue higher education within a country, than abroad Understanding burnout among special education teachers: an exploratory structural equation model in a burnout high risk profession The effect of flexible working arrangements on educator performance in Indonesia Self-efficacy of school principals for effective school functioning during the COVID-19 crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1