Impression formation of majority and minority applicants during resume screening—Does processing more information reduce prejudice?

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1111/jasp.13047
Tobias Sachs, Astrid C. Homan, Bram Lancee
{"title":"Impression formation of majority and minority applicants during resume screening—Does processing more information reduce prejudice?","authors":"Tobias Sachs,&nbsp;Astrid C. Homan,&nbsp;Bram Lancee","doi":"10.1111/jasp.13047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While previous research has consistently found evidence for ethnic discrimination after resume screening, the majority of those studies focused on outcomes of evaluating job applications. Therefore, we know little about what happens <i>during</i> resume screening. In the present study (<i>N</i> = 402), we tested whether impressions of majority and minority applicants are formed differently while processing separate snippets from job applications. While majority impressions were significantly more positive than minority impressions after the third snippet was processed, impressions did not differ anymore after four or more snippets. In specific, minority impressions improved significantly more in response to the fourth snippet, which provided information on a volunteering role. Furthermore, we found that negative information similarly harmed majority and minority impressions. Our findings suggest that minority applicants might suffer from prejudice if only little information from resumes is being processed. Thus, organizations might be able to prevent discriminatory outcomes by avoiding superficial resume screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":48404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jasp.13047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jasp.13047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While previous research has consistently found evidence for ethnic discrimination after resume screening, the majority of those studies focused on outcomes of evaluating job applications. Therefore, we know little about what happens during resume screening. In the present study (N = 402), we tested whether impressions of majority and minority applicants are formed differently while processing separate snippets from job applications. While majority impressions were significantly more positive than minority impressions after the third snippet was processed, impressions did not differ anymore after four or more snippets. In specific, minority impressions improved significantly more in response to the fourth snippet, which provided information on a volunteering role. Furthermore, we found that negative information similarly harmed majority and minority impressions. Our findings suggest that minority applicants might suffer from prejudice if only little information from resumes is being processed. Thus, organizations might be able to prevent discriminatory outcomes by avoiding superficial resume screening.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简历筛选过程中多数族裔和少数族裔申请人的印象形成--处理更多信息是否会减少偏见?
虽然以往的研究不断发现简历筛选后存在种族歧视的证据,但这些研究大多集中在求职申请的评估结果上。因此,我们对简历筛选过程中发生的事情知之甚少。在本研究(N = 402)中,我们测试了在处理求职申请中的不同片段时,多数族裔和少数族裔求职者是否会形成不同的印象。虽然在处理第三个片段后,多数求职者的印象明显比少数求职者的印象更积极,但在处理四个或更多片段后,印象就不再有差异了。具体来说,在处理第四个片段时,少数群体的印象明显改善,因为第四个片段提供了有关志愿工作的信息。此外,我们还发现负面信息同样会损害多数人和少数人的印象。我们的研究结果表明,如果只处理简历中的少量信息,少数族裔求职者可能会遭受偏见。因此,企业也许可以通过避免肤浅的简历筛选来防止歧视性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Published since 1971, Journal of Applied Social Psychology is a monthly publication devoted to applications of experimental behavioral science research to problems of society (e.g., organizational and leadership psychology, safety, health, and gender issues; perceptions of war and natural hazards; jury deliberation; performance, AIDS, cancer, heart disease, exercise, and sports).
期刊最新文献
Using self‐determination theory to link empathy and voluntary health behaviors Issue Information Belief in conspiracy theories and satisfaction in interpersonal relationships Workplace loneliness: Relationships with abstract entities as substitutes for peer relationships Motivated perception of leaders when perceived political party continuity is low: The mediating role of self‐uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1