Evaluation of Parameters and Nozzle Tip Damage after Clinical Use of Three Hydrophilic Intraocular Lens Injector Models

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1155/2024/2360368
Lu Zhang, Sonja Schickhardt, Patrick Merz, Gerd Uwe Auffarth
{"title":"Evaluation of Parameters and Nozzle Tip Damage after Clinical Use of Three Hydrophilic Intraocular Lens Injector Models","authors":"Lu Zhang, Sonja Schickhardt, Patrick Merz, Gerd Uwe Auffarth","doi":"10.1155/2024/2360368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Purpose</i>. To assess the nozzle tip damage and the parameters of three different hydrophilic intraocular lens (IOL) injector models. <i>Methods</i>. After routine cataract surgeries at the University Eye Hospital Heidelberg, all the used IOL injectors were collected from the operating room and sent to our laboratory. Nozzle tip damage was assessed under a microscope and graded as follows: no damage (grade 0), slight scratches (1), deep scratches (2), extensions (3), cracks (4), and bursts (5). Each damage grade was assigned a score from 0 to 5, and the total damage score for each injector system was calculated and compared. Nozzle tip parameters (diameters and areas), plunger tip parameters, and tip angles were also measured in each model. <i>Results</i>. The damage scores were (median, Q3-Q1): 1 (1-1) for Accuject, 1 (1-1) for Bluemixs, and 1 (1-1) for RayOne. There was no statistically significant difference in the damage scores between the study groups (<span><svg height=\"9.2729pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.6370001pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -8.6359 19.289 9.2729\" width=\"19.289pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,11.658,0)\"></path></g></svg><span></span><span><svg height=\"9.2729pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.6370001pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"22.8711838 -8.6359 21.918 9.2729\" width=\"21.918pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,22.921,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,29.161,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,32.125,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-49\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,38.365,0)\"></path></g></svg>).</span></span> The outer cross-sectional vertical and horizontal diameters were 1.69 and 1.69 mm for Accuject, 1.69 and 1.69 mm for Bluemixs, and 1.70 and 1.71 mm for RayOne. Plunger tip areas were 0.78 mm<sup>2</sup> for Accjuect, 0.74 mm<sup>2</sup> for Bluemixs, and 0.43 mm<sup>2</sup> for RayOne. Plunger tip area/inner cross-sectional area of the nozzle tip (%) was 31.2% for RayOne, 66.7% for Accuject, and 63.8% for Bluemixs. The tip angles for three injector models were 56° (Accuject), 56° (Bluemixs), and 44° (RayOne). <i>Conclusions</i>. All the injector models showed mild to moderate damage to the nozzle tip after IOL implantation, even with smaller diameter tips. RayOne resulted in the lowest ratio between plunger tip area and inner cross-sectional area of the nozzle tip and a better distribution of damage categories than the other two groups. All three injector models had relatively small tip parameters. If smaller incisions are required in certain patients, smaller tip parameters should be considered.","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2360368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. To assess the nozzle tip damage and the parameters of three different hydrophilic intraocular lens (IOL) injector models. Methods. After routine cataract surgeries at the University Eye Hospital Heidelberg, all the used IOL injectors were collected from the operating room and sent to our laboratory. Nozzle tip damage was assessed under a microscope and graded as follows: no damage (grade 0), slight scratches (1), deep scratches (2), extensions (3), cracks (4), and bursts (5). Each damage grade was assigned a score from 0 to 5, and the total damage score for each injector system was calculated and compared. Nozzle tip parameters (diameters and areas), plunger tip parameters, and tip angles were also measured in each model. Results. The damage scores were (median, Q3-Q1): 1 (1-1) for Accuject, 1 (1-1) for Bluemixs, and 1 (1-1) for RayOne. There was no statistically significant difference in the damage scores between the study groups (). The outer cross-sectional vertical and horizontal diameters were 1.69 and 1.69 mm for Accuject, 1.69 and 1.69 mm for Bluemixs, and 1.70 and 1.71 mm for RayOne. Plunger tip areas were 0.78 mm2 for Accjuect, 0.74 mm2 for Bluemixs, and 0.43 mm2 for RayOne. Plunger tip area/inner cross-sectional area of the nozzle tip (%) was 31.2% for RayOne, 66.7% for Accuject, and 63.8% for Bluemixs. The tip angles for three injector models were 56° (Accuject), 56° (Bluemixs), and 44° (RayOne). Conclusions. All the injector models showed mild to moderate damage to the nozzle tip after IOL implantation, even with smaller diameter tips. RayOne resulted in the lowest ratio between plunger tip area and inner cross-sectional area of the nozzle tip and a better distribution of damage categories than the other two groups. All three injector models had relatively small tip parameters. If smaller incisions are required in certain patients, smaller tip parameters should be considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种亲水性眼内透镜注射器临床使用后的参数和喷嘴尖端损坏评估
目的评估三种不同型号的亲水性眼内晶体(IOL)注射器的喷嘴尖端损坏情况和参数。方法。在海德堡大学眼科医院进行常规白内障手术后,从手术室收集所有使用过的人工晶体注射器,并将其送到我们的实验室。在显微镜下对喷嘴尖端的损坏情况进行评估,并将其分为以下等级:无损坏(0 级)、轻微划痕(1 级)、深度划痕(2 级)、延伸(3 级)、裂纹(4 级)和爆裂(5 级)。每个损坏等级的得分从 0 到 5 不等,然后计算每个喷射器系统的损坏总分并进行比较。还测量了每个模型的喷嘴尖端参数(直径和面积)、柱塞尖端参数和尖端角度。结果。损坏分数为(中位数,Q3-Q1):Accuject 为 1 (1-1),Bluemixs 为 1 (1-1),RayOne 为 1 (1-1)。各研究组之间的损伤评分差异无统计学意义()。Accuject 的外部横截面垂直和水平直径分别为 1.69 和 1.69 毫米,Bluemixs 为 1.69 和 1.69 毫米,RayOne 为 1.70 和 1.71 毫米。Accjuect 的柱塞头面积为 0.78 平方毫米,Bluemixs 为 0.74 平方毫米,RayOne 为 0.43 平方毫米。RayOne、Accuject 和 Bluemixs 的柱塞喷嘴顶端面积/喷嘴顶端内横截面积(%)分别为 31.2%、66.7% 和 63.8%。三种喷射器型号的喷嘴尖角分别为 56°(Accuject)、56°(Bluemixs)和 44°(RayOne)。结论。所有型号的注射器在植入人工晶体后都会对喷嘴尖端造成轻度到中度的损坏,即使是直径较小的喷嘴也是如此。与其他两组相比,RayOne 的柱塞尖端面积与喷嘴尖端内横截面积之比最小,损坏类别的分布也更好。所有三种喷射器型号的喷嘴参数都相对较小。如果某些患者需要较小的切口,则应考虑较小的喷嘴参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
期刊最新文献
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: Investigating Vessel Density Changes Induced by Caffeine in Healthy Subjects. Pathological Mechanism and Clinical Therapy Progress of Schlemm's Canal. Results of XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Using 5, 10 or 20 μg Mitomycin C: A Pilot Study. Lens Displacement and Retinal Injury in Blunt Eye Trauma. CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Predicting Visual Acuity Outcomes Following Retinal Vein Occlusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1