Liquid–Liquid Equilibrium Data and Mechanism for Separating Thiophene from Heptane Using Mixed Solvents

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1021/acs.jced.4c00154
Chong Yang*, Shimin Xu, Yuyao Xie, Yepeng Xiao, Lihua Cheng and Xinping Ouyang, 
{"title":"Liquid–Liquid Equilibrium Data and Mechanism for Separating Thiophene from Heptane Using Mixed Solvents","authors":"Chong Yang*,&nbsp;Shimin Xu,&nbsp;Yuyao Xie,&nbsp;Yepeng Xiao,&nbsp;Lihua Cheng and Xinping Ouyang,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jced.4c00154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Solvent extraction is a promising method for removing organic sulfides from fuel oils in refineries. However, selecting an appropriate extractant requires a fundamental understanding of liquid–liquid equilibria. In this study, we collected liquid–liquid equilibrium (LLE) data for ternary heptane + thiophene + solvent systems at 298.2 K and 101.3 kPa. The extraction capabilities of the selected solvents (ethylene glycol (EG), <i>N</i>-formylmorpholine, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,2-propanediol, <i>N</i>-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), <i>N</i>,<i>N</i>-dimethylacetamide, and benzyl alcohol) for separating heptane and thiophene were assessed based on the distribution constant (<i>D</i>) and separation factor (<i>S</i>). NMP exhibited the highest <i>D</i> value, whereas EG exhibited the lowest. In contrast, the EG had the highest <i>S</i> value. Therefore, to balance <i>D</i> and <i>S</i> simultaneously, mixtures of EG and NMP at different molar ratios were used as extractants. Molecular-level investigation into the separation mechanism was conducted via molecular dynamics simulations and density functional theory calculations. The enhanced <i>S</i> value of EG was attributed to a significant difference in its interaction energies with thiophene and heptane, whereas the enhanced <i>D</i> value of NMP resulted from a more negative solvation-free energy upon binding thiophene. Finally, a comparison of the thermodynamic models showed that the nonrandom two-liquid (NRTL) model and the universal quasichemical (UNIQUAC) model were equally suitable for correlating the experimental data for the ternary and quaternary heptane + thiophene + solvent systems; the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values for the NRTL model were all &lt;1%, whereas the maximum RMSD value for the UNIQUAC model was 1.57%. The obtained liquid–liquid equilibrium data and mechanistic insights can aid in improving extractive desulfurization using conventional organic solvents toward the efficient, low-cost, and simple production of clean fuel oils with ultralow sulfur contents.</p>","PeriodicalId":42,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jced.4c00154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solvent extraction is a promising method for removing organic sulfides from fuel oils in refineries. However, selecting an appropriate extractant requires a fundamental understanding of liquid–liquid equilibria. In this study, we collected liquid–liquid equilibrium (LLE) data for ternary heptane + thiophene + solvent systems at 298.2 K and 101.3 kPa. The extraction capabilities of the selected solvents (ethylene glycol (EG), N-formylmorpholine, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,2-propanediol, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), N,N-dimethylacetamide, and benzyl alcohol) for separating heptane and thiophene were assessed based on the distribution constant (D) and separation factor (S). NMP exhibited the highest D value, whereas EG exhibited the lowest. In contrast, the EG had the highest S value. Therefore, to balance D and S simultaneously, mixtures of EG and NMP at different molar ratios were used as extractants. Molecular-level investigation into the separation mechanism was conducted via molecular dynamics simulations and density functional theory calculations. The enhanced S value of EG was attributed to a significant difference in its interaction energies with thiophene and heptane, whereas the enhanced D value of NMP resulted from a more negative solvation-free energy upon binding thiophene. Finally, a comparison of the thermodynamic models showed that the nonrandom two-liquid (NRTL) model and the universal quasichemical (UNIQUAC) model were equally suitable for correlating the experimental data for the ternary and quaternary heptane + thiophene + solvent systems; the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values for the NRTL model were all <1%, whereas the maximum RMSD value for the UNIQUAC model was 1.57%. The obtained liquid–liquid equilibrium data and mechanistic insights can aid in improving extractive desulfurization using conventional organic solvents toward the efficient, low-cost, and simple production of clean fuel oils with ultralow sulfur contents.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用混合溶剂从庚烷中分离噻吩的液液平衡数据和机理
溶剂萃取是一种去除炼油厂燃料油中有机硫化物的有效方法。然而,选择合适的萃取剂需要对液液平衡有基本的了解。在这项研究中,我们收集了在 298.2 K 和 101.3 kPa 下庚烷 + 噻吩 + 溶剂三元体系的液液平衡 (LLE) 数据。所选溶剂(乙二醇(EG)、N-甲酰基吗啉、1,3-丙二醇、1,4-丁二醇、1,2-丙二醇、N-甲基-2-吡咯烷酮(NMP)、N,N-二甲基乙酰胺和苯甲醇)分离庚烷和噻吩的萃取能力根据分布常数(D)和分离因子(S)进行评估。NMP 的 D 值最高,而 EG 的 D 值最低。相反,EG 的 S 值最高。因此,为了同时平衡 D 和 S,使用了不同摩尔比的 EG 和 NMP 混合物作为萃取剂。通过分子动力学模拟和密度泛函理论计算,对分离机理进行了分子水平的研究。EG 的 S 值增强是由于其与噻吩和庚烷的相互作用能存在显著差异,而 NMP 的 D 值增强则是由于其与噻吩结合时的无溶解能为负值。最后,对热力学模型的比较表明,非随机双液(NRTL)模型和通用准化学(UNIQUAC)模型同样适用于关联三元和四元庚烷+噻吩+溶剂体系的实验数据;NRTL 模型的均方根偏差(RMSD)值均为 1%,而 UNIQUAC 模型的最大均方根偏差值为 1.57%。所获得的液液平衡数据和机理见解有助于改进使用传统有机溶剂的萃取脱硫工艺,从而高效、低成本、简单地生产出硫含量超低的清洁燃料油。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.20%
发文量
324
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data is a monthly journal devoted to the publication of data obtained from both experiment and computation, which are viewed as complementary. It is the only American Chemical Society journal primarily concerned with articles containing data on the phase behavior and the physical, thermodynamic, and transport properties of well-defined materials, including complex mixtures of known compositions. While environmental and biological samples are of interest, their compositions must be known and reproducible. As a result, adsorption on natural product materials does not generally fit within the scope of Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Influence of Cosolvents on the Solubility of Febuxostat in Supercritical CO2: Experimental Analysis and Artificial Intelligence Study Volumetric and Ultrasonic Studies on Interactions of 2-Methoxyethanol/2-Ethoxyethanol in Aqueous Solutions of Inositol at Different Temperatures Choline Chloride- and Organic Acids-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents: Exploring Chemical and Thermophysical Properties Machine Learning Assisted Discovery of Efficient MOFs for One-Step C2H4 Purification from Ternary C2H2/C2H4/C2H6 Mixtures Thermodynamic Data of Gadolinium–Strontium Phosphate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1