{"title":"Revisiting RFID Missing Tag Identification: Theoretical Foundation and Algorithm Design","authors":"Kanghuai Liu;Lin Chen;Jihong Yu;Ziyue Jia","doi":"10.1109/TNET.2024.3404471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We revisit the problem of missing tag identification in RFID networks by making three contributions. Firstly, we quantitatively compare and gauge the existing propositions spanning over a decade on missing tag identification. We show that the expected execution time of the best solution in the literature is \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\Theta \\left ({{N+\\frac {(1-\\alpha )^{2}(1-\\delta )^{2}}{ \\epsilon ^{2}}}}\\right )$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, where \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\delta $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n and \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\epsilon $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n are parameters quantifying the required identification accuracy, N denotes the number of tags in the system, among which \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\alpha N$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n tags are missing. Secondly, we analytically establish the expected execution time lower-bound for any missing tag identification algorithm as \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\Theta \\left ({{\\frac {N}{\\log N}+\\frac {(1-\\delta )^{2}(1-\\alpha )^{2}}{\\epsilon ^{2} \\log \\frac {(1-\\delta )(1-\\alpha )}{\\epsilon }}}}\\right )$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, thus setting the theoretical performance limit. Thirdly, we develop two novel missing tag identification algorithms with the expected execution time of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\Theta \\left ({{\\frac {\\log \\log N}{\\log N}N+\\frac {(1-\\alpha )^{2}(1-\\delta )^{2}}{ \\epsilon ^{2}}}}\\right )$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, reducing the time overhead by a factor of up to \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\log N$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n over the best algorithm in the literature. The key technicality in our first algorithm is a novel data structure termed as collision-partition tree (CPT), built on a subset of bits in tag pseudo-IDs, leading to a more balanced tree structure and reducing the time complexity in parsing the entire tree. To further improve time efficiency, our second algorithm integrates multiple CPTs to form a collision-partition forest (CPF), reducing both the number of slots and the quantity of information broadcasting.","PeriodicalId":13443,"journal":{"name":"IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking","volume":"32 5","pages":"4056-4066"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10540347/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We revisit the problem of missing tag identification in RFID networks by making three contributions. Firstly, we quantitatively compare and gauge the existing propositions spanning over a decade on missing tag identification. We show that the expected execution time of the best solution in the literature is
$\Theta \left ({{N+\frac {(1-\alpha )^{2}(1-\delta )^{2}}{ \epsilon ^{2}}}}\right )$
, where
$\delta $
and
$\epsilon $
are parameters quantifying the required identification accuracy, N denotes the number of tags in the system, among which
$\alpha N$
tags are missing. Secondly, we analytically establish the expected execution time lower-bound for any missing tag identification algorithm as
$\Theta \left ({{\frac {N}{\log N}+\frac {(1-\delta )^{2}(1-\alpha )^{2}}{\epsilon ^{2} \log \frac {(1-\delta )(1-\alpha )}{\epsilon }}}}\right )$
, thus setting the theoretical performance limit. Thirdly, we develop two novel missing tag identification algorithms with the expected execution time of
$\Theta \left ({{\frac {\log \log N}{\log N}N+\frac {(1-\alpha )^{2}(1-\delta )^{2}}{ \epsilon ^{2}}}}\right )$
, reducing the time overhead by a factor of up to
$\log N$
over the best algorithm in the literature. The key technicality in our first algorithm is a novel data structure termed as collision-partition tree (CPT), built on a subset of bits in tag pseudo-IDs, leading to a more balanced tree structure and reducing the time complexity in parsing the entire tree. To further improve time efficiency, our second algorithm integrates multiple CPTs to form a collision-partition forest (CPF), reducing both the number of slots and the quantity of information broadcasting.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking’s high-level objective is to publish high-quality, original research results derived from theoretical or experimental exploration of the area of communication/computer networking, covering all sorts of information transport networks over all sorts of physical layer technologies, both wireline (all kinds of guided media: e.g., copper, optical) and wireless (e.g., radio-frequency, acoustic (e.g., underwater), infra-red), or hybrids of these. The journal welcomes applied contributions reporting on novel experiences and experiments with actual systems.