On the Extent of Applicability of Various Non-linear Similarity Functions for Computation of Surface Fluxes under Stable Conditions in Numerical Models

IF 2.3 3区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Boundary-Layer Meteorology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s10546-024-00869-7
Prabhakar Namdev, Maithili Sharan, Saroj K. Mishra
{"title":"On the Extent of Applicability of Various Non-linear Similarity Functions for Computation of Surface Fluxes under Stable Conditions in Numerical Models","authors":"Prabhakar Namdev, Maithili Sharan, Saroj K. Mishra","doi":"10.1007/s10546-024-00869-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, a systematic mathematical analysis has been presented for the extent of applicability of various non-linear similarity functions for momentum <span>\\(({{\\upvarphi }}_{{\\text{m}}})\\)</span> and heat <span>\\(({{\\upvarphi }}_{{\\text{h}}})\\)</span> under stable conditions to compute surface turbulent fluxes in numerical models. The investigation is carried out for equal and unequal momentum <span>\\(({{\\text{z}}}_{0})\\)</span> and heat <span>\\(({{\\text{z}}}_{{\\text{h}}})\\)</span> roughness lengths. The study reveals that <span>\\({{\\upvarphi }}_{{\\text{m}}}\\)</span> and <span>\\({{\\upvarphi }}_{{\\text{h}}}\\)</span> utilized in the National Centre for Atmospheric Research Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (NCAR-CAM5) (Holtslag et al. in Mon Weather Rev 118:1561–1575, 1990) have several restrictions on their applicability in moderately to strongly stable cases. If the ratios of <span>\\({{\\text{z}}}_{0}\\)</span> and <span>\\({{\\text{z}}}_{{\\text{h}}}\\)</span> to the height <span>\\(({\\text{z}})\\)</span> from the surface (i.e., <span>\\(\\frac{{{\\text{z}}}_{0}}{{\\text{z}}}\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\frac{{{\\text{z}}}_{{\\text{h}}}}{{\\text{z}}}\\)</span>) lie in the range <span>\\((0.2, 1)\\)</span>, the functions are valid for a limited range of <span>\\(\\upzeta \\)</span> (stability parameter) in strong stable conditions <span>\\(\\left(\\upzeta &gt;1\\right)\\)</span>; however, when <span>\\(\\frac{{{\\text{z}}}_{0}}{{\\text{z}}}\\le 0.2\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\frac{{{\\text{z}}}_{{\\text{h}}}}{{\\text{z}}}\\le 0.2\\)</span>, the validity of functions is unrestricted. In terms of bulk Richardson number <span>\\(\\left({{\\text{Ri}}}_{{\\text{B}}}\\right)\\)</span>, the functions are valid for a limited range of moderately to strongly stable conditions. These theoretically derived upper limits have also been validated using observations from the UK Meteorological Office’s Cardington and Cooperative Atmosphere-Surface Exchange Study-99 datasets. On the other hand, similarity functions based on Cheng and Brutsaert (Boundary-Layer Meteorol 114:519–538, 2005), Grachev et al. (Boundary-Layer Meteorol 124:315–333, 2007), Srivastava et al. (Meteorol Appl 27, 2020), and Gryanik et al. (J Atmos Sci 77:2687–2716, 2020) are found to be theoretically valid for all values of <span>\\(\\upzeta \\)</span> and <span>\\({{\\text{Ri}}}_{{\\text{B}}}\\)</span>. The efforts have also been made to implement these functions in the Weather Research and Forecasting as well as global scale models.</p>","PeriodicalId":9153,"journal":{"name":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-024-00869-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, a systematic mathematical analysis has been presented for the extent of applicability of various non-linear similarity functions for momentum \(({{\upvarphi }}_{{\text{m}}})\) and heat \(({{\upvarphi }}_{{\text{h}}})\) under stable conditions to compute surface turbulent fluxes in numerical models. The investigation is carried out for equal and unequal momentum \(({{\text{z}}}_{0})\) and heat \(({{\text{z}}}_{{\text{h}}})\) roughness lengths. The study reveals that \({{\upvarphi }}_{{\text{m}}}\) and \({{\upvarphi }}_{{\text{h}}}\) utilized in the National Centre for Atmospheric Research Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (NCAR-CAM5) (Holtslag et al. in Mon Weather Rev 118:1561–1575, 1990) have several restrictions on their applicability in moderately to strongly stable cases. If the ratios of \({{\text{z}}}_{0}\) and \({{\text{z}}}_{{\text{h}}}\) to the height \(({\text{z}})\) from the surface (i.e., \(\frac{{{\text{z}}}_{0}}{{\text{z}}}\) and \(\frac{{{\text{z}}}_{{\text{h}}}}{{\text{z}}}\)) lie in the range \((0.2, 1)\), the functions are valid for a limited range of \(\upzeta \) (stability parameter) in strong stable conditions \(\left(\upzeta >1\right)\); however, when \(\frac{{{\text{z}}}_{0}}{{\text{z}}}\le 0.2\) and \(\frac{{{\text{z}}}_{{\text{h}}}}{{\text{z}}}\le 0.2\), the validity of functions is unrestricted. In terms of bulk Richardson number \(\left({{\text{Ri}}}_{{\text{B}}}\right)\), the functions are valid for a limited range of moderately to strongly stable conditions. These theoretically derived upper limits have also been validated using observations from the UK Meteorological Office’s Cardington and Cooperative Atmosphere-Surface Exchange Study-99 datasets. On the other hand, similarity functions based on Cheng and Brutsaert (Boundary-Layer Meteorol 114:519–538, 2005), Grachev et al. (Boundary-Layer Meteorol 124:315–333, 2007), Srivastava et al. (Meteorol Appl 27, 2020), and Gryanik et al. (J Atmos Sci 77:2687–2716, 2020) are found to be theoretically valid for all values of \(\upzeta \) and \({{\text{Ri}}}_{{\text{B}}}\). The efforts have also been made to implement these functions in the Weather Research and Forecasting as well as global scale models.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论各种非线性相似函数在数值模型稳定条件下计算地表通量的适用范围
在本研究中,对各种非线性相似函数在稳定条件下的适用范围进行了系统的数学分析,以计算数值模型中的表面湍流通量的动量(({\upvarphi }}_{\text{m}}} )和热量(({\upvarphi }}_{\text{h}}} )。研究针对等长和不等长的动量(({{\text{z}}}_{0})和热量(({{\text{z}}}_{\text{h}}})粗糙度长度进行。研究表明,美国国家大气研究中心共同体大气模型第 5 版(NCAR-CAM5)(Holtslag 等人在 Mon Weather Rev 118:1561-1575, 1990 年)中使用的 \({{\upvarphi }}_{{text{m}}} 和 \({{\upvarphi }}_{{text{h}}}) 在中度到高度稳定情况下的适用性受到了一些限制。如果\({\text{z}}}_{0}\)和\({\text{z}}}_{{\text{h}}})与距地表高度\(({\text{z}})\)之比(即、\(\frac{{{text{z}}}_{{0}}{{text{z}}}\) 和 \(\frac{{{text{z}}}_{{\text{h}}}}{{{\text{z}}}}) 位于 \((0.2, 1)\),在强稳定条件下,这些函数对有限范围内的\(\upzeta \)(稳定参数)是有效的\(\left(\upzeta >1\right)\); 但是,当\(\frac{{text{z}}}_{0}}{{text{z}}}le 0.2)和({frac{{text{z}}}_{text{h}}}}{{text{z}}}le 0.2)时,函数的有效性是不受限制的。就体理查森数(left({{\text{Ri}}}_{{\text{B}}}right))而言,函数在有限范围的中度到高度稳定条件下有效。英国气象局的卡丁顿数据集和 "大气-地表交换合作研究-99 "数据集的观测结果也验证了这些理论推导的上限。另一方面,基于 Cheng 和 Brutsaert(《边界层气象学》114:519-538,2005 年)、Grachev 等人(《边界层气象学》124:315-333,2007 年)、Srivastava 等人(《气象学应用》27, 2007 年)的相似性函数,也可以得出稳定上限。(Meteorol Appl 27, 2020) 和 Gryanik 等人 (J Atmos Sci 77:2687-2716, 2020) 的研究发现,对于所有 \(\upzeta \) 和 \({{text{Ri}}}_{{text{B}}}) 值,理论上都是有效的。我们还努力在天气研究和预报以及全球尺度模式中实现这些功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Boundary-Layer Meteorology
Boundary-Layer Meteorology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
14.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Boundary-Layer Meteorology offers several publishing options: Research Letters, Research Articles, and Notes and Comments. The Research Letters section is designed to allow quick dissemination of new scientific findings, with an initial review period of no longer than one month. The Research Articles section offers traditional scientific papers that present results and interpretations based on substantial research studies or critical reviews of ongoing research. The Notes and Comments section comprises occasional notes and comments on specific topics with no requirement for rapid publication. Research Letters are limited in size to five journal pages, including no more than three figures, and cannot contain supplementary online material; Research Articles are generally fifteen to twenty pages in length with no more than fifteen figures; Notes and Comments are limited to ten journal pages and five figures. Authors submitting Research Letters should include within their cover letter an explanation of the need for rapid publication. More information regarding all publication formats can be found in the recent Editorial ‘Introducing Research Letters to Boundary-Layer Meteorology’.
期刊最新文献
Geostrophic Drag Law in Conventionally Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer: Simplified Parametrization and Numerical Validation Variation in Zero Plane Displacement and Roughness Length for Momentum Revisited Rainfall Effects on Atmospheric Turbulence and Near-Surface Similarities in the Stable Boundary Layer Rethinking the Roughness Height: An Improved Description of Temperature Profiles over Short Vegetation On the Extent of Applicability of Various Non-linear Similarity Functions for Computation of Surface Fluxes under Stable Conditions in Numerical Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1