Evaluating the effectiveness of systemic heparin during arteriovenous fistula creation by emulating a target trial.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae098
Patrick Heindel, James J Fitzgibbon, Eric A Secemsky, Michael Belkin, C Keith Ozaki, Mohamad A Hussain
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of systemic heparin during arteriovenous fistula creation by emulating a target trial.","authors":"Patrick Heindel, James J Fitzgibbon, Eric A Secemsky, Michael Belkin, C Keith Ozaki, Mohamad A Hussain","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most of the 800 000 people living with end-stage kidney disease in the United States rely on a functioning vascular access to provide life-sustaining hemodialysis, yet one-third of arteriovenous fistulas experience early failures. Determining the safety and effectiveness of systemic heparin during fistula creation could improve the quality and quantity of life for these vulnerable patients. In this article, a pragmatic randomized trial was emulated to assess the effect of systemic heparin administration (vs none) during radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula creation on early bleeding and thrombosis, using data from 2 international, multicenter, randomized trials performed between 2014 and 2019. Marginal risks were estimated using inverse probability weighted parametric survival analysis and CIs were generated with bootstrapping. A total of 914 patients were enrolled and 61% received systemic heparin; their median (IQR) age was 58 (49, 67) years and 45% were on hemodialysis at enrollment. No difference in the risk of bleeding events was observed, with a risk difference (95% CI) at 14 days of -0.1% (-1.6 to 1.4). The risk of access thrombosis was lower in the heparin group, with a risk of 3.7% (2.6-4.8) after heparin and 5.3% (3.4-7.4) without heparin at 14 days (risk ratio = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98). Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifiers: NCT02110901 and NCT02414841.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"651-658"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most of the 800 000 people living with end-stage kidney disease in the United States rely on a functioning vascular access to provide life-sustaining hemodialysis, yet one-third of arteriovenous fistulas experience early failures. Determining the safety and effectiveness of systemic heparin during fistula creation could improve the quality and quantity of life for these vulnerable patients. In this article, a pragmatic randomized trial was emulated to assess the effect of systemic heparin administration (vs none) during radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula creation on early bleeding and thrombosis, using data from 2 international, multicenter, randomized trials performed between 2014 and 2019. Marginal risks were estimated using inverse probability weighted parametric survival analysis and CIs were generated with bootstrapping. A total of 914 patients were enrolled and 61% received systemic heparin; their median (IQR) age was 58 (49, 67) years and 45% were on hemodialysis at enrollment. No difference in the risk of bleeding events was observed, with a risk difference (95% CI) at 14 days of -0.1% (-1.6 to 1.4). The risk of access thrombosis was lower in the heparin group, with a risk of 3.7% (2.6-4.8) after heparin and 5.3% (3.4-7.4) without heparin at 14 days (risk ratio = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98). Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifiers: NCT02110901 and NCT02414841.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过模仿目标试验评估动静脉瘘创建过程中全身使用肝素的效果。
美国有 80 万名终末期肾病患者,他们中的大多数人都依赖正常的血管通路来进行维持生命的血液透析,然而三分之一的动静脉瘘管会出现早期失败。确定瘘管创建过程中全身使用肝素的安全性和有效性可以提高这些脆弱患者的生活质量和数量。本文利用 2014 年至 2019 年间进行的两项国际多中心随机试验的数据,模拟了一项务实的随机试验,以评估在放射脑动静脉造瘘术中使用全身肝素(与不使用肝素)对早期出血和血栓形成的影响。边际风险采用反概率加权参数生存分析进行估算,置信区间采用引导法生成。共有914名患者入组,61%的患者接受了全身肝素治疗;中位(IQR)年龄为58(49,67)岁,45%的患者入组时正在进行血液透析。未观察到出血事件风险有差异,14 天的风险差异(95% CI)为-0.1%(-1.6, 1.4)。肝素组的入路血栓风险较低,14 天时,使用肝素后的风险为 3.7% (2.6, 4.8),未使用肝素的风险为 5.3% (3.4, 7.4)(风险比 0.72, 95% CI 0.50, 0.98)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the effectiveness of systemic heparin during arteriovenous fistula creation by emulating a target trial. Long-term PM2.5 exposure and peak expiratory flow in middle-aged and older people in China: a quasi-experimental study. Physical activity, fitness, and cardiac autonomic function among adults born postterm. Mediating pathways between neighborhood disadvantage and cardiovascular risk: quasi-experimental evidence from a Danish refugee dispersal policy. The Puerto Rico Young Adults' Stress, Contextual, Behavioral, and Cardiometabolic Risk (PR-OUTLOOK) Study: design and methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1