The Feasibility and Reliability of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients With Negative Axillary Lymph Nodes-A Meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11782234241255856
Mengjie Yu, Yu Liu, Zenan Huang, Qingqing Zhu, Yong Huang
{"title":"The Feasibility and Reliability of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients With Negative Axillary Lymph Nodes-A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Mengjie Yu, Yu Liu, Zenan Huang, Qingqing Zhu, Yong Huang","doi":"10.1177/11782234241255856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The application of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has expanded from early breast cancer to locally advanced breast cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). For patients with negative axillary lymph nodes, performing SLNB before or after NAC remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic feasibility and reliability of SLNB after NAC in breast cancer patients with negative axillary nodes at initial diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>To calculate pooled identification rate (IR) and false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB after NAC on breast cancer patients with initially negative axillary nodes by enrolling relevant studies and perform subgroup analysis by the type of tracer and the number of biopsied sentinel lymph nodes in average.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from January 1, 2002, to March 1, 2022, were searched for studies. The QUADAS-2 tool and MINORS item were employed to evaluate the quality of the included studies. <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> and Q tests were used to evaluate the heterogeneity among the studies. Random-effects model and fixed-effects model were employed to calculate the pooled IR, FNR, and 95% confidence interval (CI). Publication bias was evaluated, and sensitivity analysis was performed. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of tracer (single/double) and the number of biopsied sentinel lymph nodes in average (⩽2/>2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 studies covering 1716 patients were enrolled in this study (IR = 93%, 95% CI = 90-96; FNR = 8%, 95% CI = 6-11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SLNB after NAC can serve as a feasible and reliable approach in breast cancer patients with negative axillary lymph node. In our study, no significant impact of tracer was found on the IR and FNR of SLNB, and the number of biopsy nodes >2 leads to the decreased FNR of SLNB.</p>","PeriodicalId":9163,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"11782234241255856"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11141228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782234241255856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The application of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has expanded from early breast cancer to locally advanced breast cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). For patients with negative axillary lymph nodes, performing SLNB before or after NAC remains controversial.

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic feasibility and reliability of SLNB after NAC in breast cancer patients with negative axillary nodes at initial diagnosis.

Design: To calculate pooled identification rate (IR) and false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB after NAC on breast cancer patients with initially negative axillary nodes by enrolling relevant studies and perform subgroup analysis by the type of tracer and the number of biopsied sentinel lymph nodes in average.

Data sources and methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from January 1, 2002, to March 1, 2022, were searched for studies. The QUADAS-2 tool and MINORS item were employed to evaluate the quality of the included studies. I2 and Q tests were used to evaluate the heterogeneity among the studies. Random-effects model and fixed-effects model were employed to calculate the pooled IR, FNR, and 95% confidence interval (CI). Publication bias was evaluated, and sensitivity analysis was performed. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of tracer (single/double) and the number of biopsied sentinel lymph nodes in average (⩽2/>2).

Results: A total of 21 studies covering 1716 patients were enrolled in this study (IR = 93%, 95% CI = 90-96; FNR = 8%, 95% CI = 6-11).

Conclusion: The SLNB after NAC can serve as a feasible and reliable approach in breast cancer patients with negative axillary lymph node. In our study, no significant impact of tracer was found on the IR and FNR of SLNB, and the number of biopsy nodes >2 leads to the decreased FNR of SLNB.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腋窝淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌患者在新辅助化疗后进行前哨淋巴结活检的可行性和可靠性--一项 Meta 分析。
背景:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的应用已从早期乳腺癌扩展到接受新辅助化疗(NAC)的局部晚期乳腺癌。对于腋窝淋巴结阴性的患者,在新辅助化疗之前还是之后进行前哨淋巴结活检仍存在争议:评估对初诊时腋窝淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌患者在 NAC 后进行 SLNB 诊断的可行性和可靠性:设计:通过纳入相关研究,计算NAC后SLNB对初始腋窝结节阴性的乳腺癌患者的集合识别率(IR)和假阴性率(FNR),并根据示踪剂类型和活检前哨淋巴结的平均数量进行亚组分析:对2002年1月1日至2022年3月1日期间的PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science和Scopus数据库进行了研究检索。采用QUADAS-2工具和MINORS项目来评估纳入研究的质量。采用 I2 和 Q 检验来评估研究之间的异质性。采用随机效应模型和固定效应模型计算汇总的IR、FNR和95%置信区间(CI)。评估了发表偏倚,并进行了敏感性分析。根据示踪剂的类型(单/双)和活检前哨淋巴结的平均数量(⩽2/>2)进行亚组分析:本研究共纳入21项研究,覆盖1716名患者(IR = 93%,95% CI = 90-96;FNR = 8%,95% CI = 6-11):结论:对于腋窝淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌患者,在 NAC 后进行 SLNB 是一种可行且可靠的方法。我们的研究发现,示踪剂对SLNB的IR和FNR无明显影响,活检结节数大于2会导致SLNB的FNR下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, journal which considers manuscripts on all areas of breast cancer research and treatment. We welcome original research, short notes, case studies and review articles related to breast cancer-related research. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to, breast cancer sub types, pathobiology, metastasis, genetics and epigenetics, mammary gland biology, breast cancer models, prevention, detection, therapy and clinical interventions, and epidemiology and population genetics.
期刊最新文献
Multicenter Prospective Study in HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer for Detecting Minimal Residual Disease by Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: HARMONY Study. ENO1 as a Biomarker of Breast Cancer Progression and Metastasis: A Bioinformatic Approach Using Available Databases. Quality of Life in Female Breast Cancer Patients and Survivors in a South African Municipality. Serum and Fecal Metabolite Profiles Linking With Gut Microbiome in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients. Higher 10-Year Survival with Breast-Conserving Therapy over Mastectomy for Women with Early-Stage (I-II) Breast Cancer: Analysis of the CDC Patterns of Care Data Base.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1