The perceptions of nurses and physicians in primary care of rehabilitation for frail older adults.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-02 DOI:10.1177/02692155241258286
Maria Laitalainen Törnudd, Anneli Peolsson, Maria M Johansson
{"title":"The perceptions of nurses and physicians in primary care of rehabilitation for frail older adults.","authors":"Maria Laitalainen Törnudd, Anneli Peolsson, Maria M Johansson","doi":"10.1177/02692155241258286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the perceptions of primary care nurses and physicians of the potential contributions of physiotherapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) in the treatment of frail older persons, as well as the obstacles to, and opportunities for, collaboration.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Participants and setting: </strong>Nurses (n = 9) and physicians (n = 8) in primary care in the county council [14 women (82%)] with experience working with older people.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Interview study conducted with a semi-structured interview guide. Analyses were carried out with content analysis with an inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis resulted in six categories: knowledge of physiotherapy and occupational therapy interventions; what triggers the need for physiotherapy and occupational therapy?; the availability of rehabilitation interventions; teamwork opportunities and difficulties; motivating the patient; the site of the rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Close and clear collaboration between nurses and physicians and PTs and OTs is an important factor in ensuring that rehabilitation interventions provide the greatest possible benefit to the patient. Improving communication between different healthcare providers and clarifying the contact routes is a prerequisite for patients to be able to get the rehabilitation they need. More research is needed to determine the best approach to achieving this goal.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1276-1286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11468118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241258286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the perceptions of primary care nurses and physicians of the potential contributions of physiotherapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) in the treatment of frail older persons, as well as the obstacles to, and opportunities for, collaboration.

Design: A qualitative study.

Participants and setting: Nurses (n = 9) and physicians (n = 8) in primary care in the county council [14 women (82%)] with experience working with older people.

Method: Interview study conducted with a semi-structured interview guide. Analyses were carried out with content analysis with an inductive approach.

Results: The analysis resulted in six categories: knowledge of physiotherapy and occupational therapy interventions; what triggers the need for physiotherapy and occupational therapy?; the availability of rehabilitation interventions; teamwork opportunities and difficulties; motivating the patient; the site of the rehabilitation.

Conclusions: Close and clear collaboration between nurses and physicians and PTs and OTs is an important factor in ensuring that rehabilitation interventions provide the greatest possible benefit to the patient. Improving communication between different healthcare providers and clarifying the contact routes is a prerequisite for patients to be able to get the rehabilitation they need. More research is needed to determine the best approach to achieving this goal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基层医疗机构的护士和医生对体弱老年人康复治疗的看法。
目的调查初级保健护士和医生对物理治疗师(PT)和职业治疗师(OT)在体弱老年人治疗中的潜在贡献的看法,以及合作的障碍和机会:设计:定性研究:方法:以半定性的方式进行访谈研究:方法:采用半结构式访谈指南进行访谈研究。采用归纳法进行内容分析:分析结果分为六类:对物理治疗和职业治疗干预措施的了解;什么因素引发了对物理治疗和职业治疗的需求;康复干预措施的可用性;团队合作的机会和困难;激励病人;康复场所:护士和医生与物理治疗师和作业治疗师之间密切而明确的合作是确保康复干预为患者带来最大益处的重要因素。加强不同医疗服务提供者之间的沟通,明确联系途径,是患者获得所需康复服务的前提条件。要确定实现这一目标的最佳方法,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with physical therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review. Working towards consensus on the assessment of mood after severe acquired brain injury: Focus groups with UK-based professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1