Does job stress mediate the risk of work disability due to common mental disorders among social workers compared with other health and social care, education, and non-human service professionals? A prospective cohort study of public sector employees in Finland.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.5271/sjweh.4171
Otso Rantonen, Jenni Ervasti, Kristina Alexanderson, Tuula Oksanen, Ville Aalto, Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz, Paula Salo
{"title":"Does job stress mediate the risk of work disability due to common mental disorders among social workers compared with other health and social care, education, and non-human service professionals? A prospective cohort study of public sector employees in Finland.","authors":"Otso Rantonen, Jenni Ervasti, Kristina Alexanderson, Tuula Oksanen, Ville Aalto, Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz, Paula Salo","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate (i) the risk of work disability (>10-day sickness absence spell or disability pension) due to common mental disorders (CMD) among social workers compared with other health and social care, education, and non-human service professionals and (ii) whether the risk was mediated by job stress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 16 306 public sector professionals in Finland was followed using survey data from baseline (2004 or if not available, 2008) on job stress [job strain or effort-reward imbalance (ERI)] and register data on work disability due to CMD from baseline through 2011. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the risk of work disability due to CMD between three occupation-pairs in a counterfactual setting, controlling for age, sex, job contract, body mass index, alcohol risk use, smoking, and physical inactivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Social workers' job stress was at higher level only when compared to education professionals. Thus, the mediation hypothesis was analyzed comparing social workers to education professionals. Social workers had a higher risk of work disability due to CMD compared with education professionals [hazard ratio (HR) 2.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58-2.74]. This HR was partly mediated by job strain (24%) and ERI (12%). Social workers had a higher risk of work disability than non-human service professionals (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.13-2.09), but not compared with other health and social care professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Job stress partly mediated the excess risk of work disability among social workers only in comparison with education professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":"456-465"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate (i) the risk of work disability (>10-day sickness absence spell or disability pension) due to common mental disorders (CMD) among social workers compared with other health and social care, education, and non-human service professionals and (ii) whether the risk was mediated by job stress.

Methods: A cohort of 16 306 public sector professionals in Finland was followed using survey data from baseline (2004 or if not available, 2008) on job stress [job strain or effort-reward imbalance (ERI)] and register data on work disability due to CMD from baseline through 2011. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the risk of work disability due to CMD between three occupation-pairs in a counterfactual setting, controlling for age, sex, job contract, body mass index, alcohol risk use, smoking, and physical inactivity.

Results: Social workers' job stress was at higher level only when compared to education professionals. Thus, the mediation hypothesis was analyzed comparing social workers to education professionals. Social workers had a higher risk of work disability due to CMD compared with education professionals [hazard ratio (HR) 2.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58-2.74]. This HR was partly mediated by job strain (24%) and ERI (12%). Social workers had a higher risk of work disability than non-human service professionals (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.13-2.09), but not compared with other health and social care professionals.

Conclusions: Job stress partly mediated the excess risk of work disability among social workers only in comparison with education professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与其他医疗和社会护理、教育以及非人工服务专业人员相比,工作压力是否会调节社会工作者因常见精神障碍而导致工作残疾的风险?一项针对芬兰公共部门雇员的前瞻性队列研究。
研究目的本研究旨在调查:(i) 社会工作者与其他医疗和社会护理、教育以及非人工服务专业人员相比,因常见精神障碍(CMD)而导致工作残疾(>10 天病假或残疾抚恤金)的风险;(ii) 该风险是否受工作压力的影响:方法: 我们利用基线(2004 年,如果没有,则为 2008 年)工作压力[工作压力或努力-回报不平衡(ERI)]调查数据,以及从基线到 2011 年因 CMD 而导致的工作残疾登记数据,对芬兰 16 306 名公共部门专业人员进行了群组跟踪调查。在控制年龄、性别、工作合同、体重指数、酗酒风险、吸烟和缺乏运动的情况下,采用考克斯比例危险模型分析了三种职业对在反事实环境中因慢性阻塞性肺病而导致工作残疾的风险:结果:只有与教育专业人员相比,社会工作者的工作压力才更大。因此,将社工与教育专业人员进行比较,对中介假设进行分析。与教育专业人员相比,社工因慢性阻塞性肺病导致工作残疾的风险更高[危险比(HR)为 2.08,95% 置信区间(CI)为 1.58-2.74]。这一危险比部分受工作压力(24%)和 ERI(12%)的影响。与非人力服务专业人员相比,社工的工作残疾风险更高(HR 1.54,95% CI 1.13-2.09),但与其他医疗和社会护理专业人员相比,社工的工作残疾风险并不高:结论:与教育专业人员相比,工作压力在一定程度上调节了社工的工作残疾风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).
期刊最新文献
Differential attrition and engagement in randomized controlled trials of occupational mental health interventions in person and online: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Associations between bioaerosols, lung function work-shift changes and inflammatory markers: A study of recycling workers. Effect of a smartphone self-management digital support system for low-back pain (selfBACK) among workers with high physical work demands - secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Facilitators and barriers for working beyond statutory pension age: A prospective cohort study across 26 European countries. In or out of reach? Long-term trends in the reach of health assessments in the Swedish occupational setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1