Scoring facial attractiveness with deep convolutional neural networks: How training on standardized images reduces the bias of facial expressions.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-02 DOI:10.1111/ocr.12820
Dorothea Obwegeser, Radu Timofte, Christoph Mayer, Michael M Bornstein, Marc A Schätzle, Raphael Patcas
{"title":"Scoring facial attractiveness with deep convolutional neural networks: How training on standardized images reduces the bias of facial expressions.","authors":"Dorothea Obwegeser, Radu Timofte, Christoph Mayer, Michael M Bornstein, Marc A Schätzle, Raphael Patcas","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In many medical disciplines, facial attractiveness is part of the diagnosis, yet its scoring might be confounded by facial expressions. The intent was to apply deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) to identify how facial expressions affect facial attractiveness and to explore whether a dedicated training of the CNN is able to reduce the bias of facial expressions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Frontal facial images (n = 840) of 40 female participants (mean age 24.5 years) were taken adapting a neutral facial expression and the six universal facial expressions. Facial attractiveness was computed by means of a face detector, deep convolutional neural networks, standard support vector regression for facial beauty, visual regularized collaborative filtering and a regression technique for handling visual queries without rating history. CNN was first trained on random facial photographs from a dating website and then further trained on the Chicago Face Database (CFD) to increase its suitability to medical conditions. Both algorithms scored every image for attractiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Facial expressions affect facial attractiveness scores significantly. Scores from CNN additionally trained on CFD had less variability between the expressions (range 54.3-60.9 compared to range: 32.6-49.5) and less variance within the scores (P ≤ .05), but also caused a shift in the ranking of the expressions' facial attractiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Facial expressions confound attractiveness scores. Training on norming images generated scores less susceptible to distortion, but more difficult to interpret. Scoring facial attractiveness based on CNN seems promising, but AI solutions must be developed on CNN trained to recognize facial expressions as distractors.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In many medical disciplines, facial attractiveness is part of the diagnosis, yet its scoring might be confounded by facial expressions. The intent was to apply deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) to identify how facial expressions affect facial attractiveness and to explore whether a dedicated training of the CNN is able to reduce the bias of facial expressions.

Materials and methods: Frontal facial images (n = 840) of 40 female participants (mean age 24.5 years) were taken adapting a neutral facial expression and the six universal facial expressions. Facial attractiveness was computed by means of a face detector, deep convolutional neural networks, standard support vector regression for facial beauty, visual regularized collaborative filtering and a regression technique for handling visual queries without rating history. CNN was first trained on random facial photographs from a dating website and then further trained on the Chicago Face Database (CFD) to increase its suitability to medical conditions. Both algorithms scored every image for attractiveness.

Results: Facial expressions affect facial attractiveness scores significantly. Scores from CNN additionally trained on CFD had less variability between the expressions (range 54.3-60.9 compared to range: 32.6-49.5) and less variance within the scores (P ≤ .05), but also caused a shift in the ranking of the expressions' facial attractiveness.

Conclusion: Facial expressions confound attractiveness scores. Training on norming images generated scores less susceptible to distortion, but more difficult to interpret. Scoring facial attractiveness based on CNN seems promising, but AI solutions must be developed on CNN trained to recognize facial expressions as distractors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用深度卷积神经网络为面部吸引力评分:在标准化图像上进行训练如何减少面部表情的偏差。
目的:在许多医学学科中,面部吸引力是诊断的一部分,但其评分可能会受到面部表情的影响。我们的目的是应用深度卷积神经网络(CNN)来识别面部表情如何影响面部吸引力,并探索对 CNN 进行专门训练是否能减少面部表情的偏差:拍摄了 40 名女性参与者(平均年龄 24.5 岁)的正面面部图像(n = 840),并调整了中性面部表情和六种通用面部表情。面部吸引力是通过面部检测器、深度卷积神经网络、面部美感标准支持向量回归、可视化正则化协同过滤和处理无评级历史的视觉查询的回归技术计算得出的。CNN 首先在交友网站的随机面部照片上进行训练,然后在芝加哥面部数据库(CFD)上进一步训练,以提高其对医疗条件的适用性。两种算法都对每张图片进行了吸引力评分:结果:面部表情对面部吸引力评分的影响很大。在 CFD 上经过额外训练的 CNN 得出的分数在表情之间的变异性较小(范围为 54.3-60.9,而范围为 32.6-49.5),分数内部的变异性较小(P ≤ .05),但也导致了表情面部吸引力排名的变化:结论:面部表情会混淆吸引力得分。结论:面部表情会混淆吸引力评分,在标准图像上进行训练产生的评分不易失真,但更难解释。基于 CNN 的面部吸引力评分似乎很有前景,但人工智能解决方案必须在经过训练的 CNN 上开发,以识别作为干扰因素的面部表情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1