Steroid therapy in acute exacerbation of fibrotic interstitial lung disease.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respirology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-02 DOI:10.1111/resp.14763
Kavya Koshy, Hayley Barnes, Erica Farrand, Ian Glaspole
{"title":"Steroid therapy in acute exacerbation of fibrotic interstitial lung disease.","authors":"Kavya Koshy, Hayley Barnes, Erica Farrand, Ian Glaspole","doi":"10.1111/resp.14763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Evidence for the benefit of steroid therapy in acute exacerbations (AEs) of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is limited; however, they remain a cornerstone of management in other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. This retrospective observational study assesses the effect of steroid treatment on in-hospital mortality in patients with acute exacerbation of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (AE-FILD) including IPF and non-IPF ILDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AE-FILD cases over a 10-year period were filtered using a code-based algorithm followed by individual case evaluation. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between corticosteroid treatment (defined as ≥0.5 mg/kg/day of prednisolone-equivalent for ≥3 days within the first 72 h of admission) and in-hospital mortality or need for lung transplantation. Secondary outcomes included readmission, overall survival, requirement for domiciliary oxygen and rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across two centres a total of 107 AE-FILD subjects were included, of which 46 patients (43%) received acute steroid treatment. The steroid cohort was of younger age with fewer comorbidities but had higher oxygen requirements. Pre-admission FVC and DLCO, distribution of diagnoses and smoking history were similar. The mean steroid treatment dose was 4.59 mg/kg/day. Steroid use appeared to be associated with increased risk of inpatient mortality or transplantation (OR 4.11; 95% CI 1.00-16.83; p = 0.049). In the steroid group, there appeared to be a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in non-IPF patients (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.04-0.96; p = 0.04) compared to their IPF counterparts. Median survival was reduced in the steroid group (221 vs. 520.5 days) with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 3.25; 95% CI 1.56-6.77; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this two-centre retrospective study of 107 patients, AE-FILD demonstrates a high risk of mortality, at a level similar to that seen for AE-IPF, despite steroid treatment. Clinicians should consider other precipitating factors for exacerbations and use steroids judiciously. Further prospective trials are needed to determine the role of corticosteroids in AE-FILD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21129,"journal":{"name":"Respirology","volume":" ","pages":"795-802"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14763","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Evidence for the benefit of steroid therapy in acute exacerbations (AEs) of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is limited; however, they remain a cornerstone of management in other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. This retrospective observational study assesses the effect of steroid treatment on in-hospital mortality in patients with acute exacerbation of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (AE-FILD) including IPF and non-IPF ILDs.

Methods: AE-FILD cases over a 10-year period were filtered using a code-based algorithm followed by individual case evaluation. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between corticosteroid treatment (defined as ≥0.5 mg/kg/day of prednisolone-equivalent for ≥3 days within the first 72 h of admission) and in-hospital mortality or need for lung transplantation. Secondary outcomes included readmission, overall survival, requirement for domiciliary oxygen and rehabilitation.

Results: Across two centres a total of 107 AE-FILD subjects were included, of which 46 patients (43%) received acute steroid treatment. The steroid cohort was of younger age with fewer comorbidities but had higher oxygen requirements. Pre-admission FVC and DLCO, distribution of diagnoses and smoking history were similar. The mean steroid treatment dose was 4.59 mg/kg/day. Steroid use appeared to be associated with increased risk of inpatient mortality or transplantation (OR 4.11; 95% CI 1.00-16.83; p = 0.049). In the steroid group, there appeared to be a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in non-IPF patients (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.04-0.96; p = 0.04) compared to their IPF counterparts. Median survival was reduced in the steroid group (221 vs. 520.5 days) with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 3.25; 95% CI 1.56-6.77; p < 0.01).

Conclusion: In this two-centre retrospective study of 107 patients, AE-FILD demonstrates a high risk of mortality, at a level similar to that seen for AE-IPF, despite steroid treatment. Clinicians should consider other precipitating factors for exacerbations and use steroids judiciously. Further prospective trials are needed to determine the role of corticosteroids in AE-FILD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纤维化间质性肺病急性加重期的类固醇治疗。
背景和目的:类固醇治疗对特发性肺纤维化(IPF)急性加重(AE)的益处证据有限;但类固醇治疗仍是其他纤维化间质性肺病的治疗基石。这项回顾性观察研究评估了类固醇治疗对纤维化间质性肺疾病(AE-FILD)急性加重患者(包括 IPF 和非 IPF ILDs)院内死亡率的影响:采用基于代码的算法对 10 年间的 AE-FILD 病例进行筛选,然后进行个案评估。采用二元逻辑回归分析评估皮质类固醇治疗(定义为入院后 72 小时内泼尼松龙当量≥0.5 mg/kg/天,持续时间≥3 天)与院内死亡率或肺移植需求之间的关系。次要结果包括再入院率、总生存率、家庭用氧需求和康复需求:两个中心共纳入了 107 名 AE-FILD 受试者,其中 46 名患者(43%)接受了急性类固醇治疗。接受类固醇治疗的患者年龄较小,合并症较少,但需氧量较高。入院前的 FVC 和 DLCO、诊断分布和吸烟史相似。类固醇治疗的平均剂量为 4.59 毫克/千克/天。使用类固醇似乎与住院患者死亡或移植风险增加有关(OR 4.11;95% CI 1.00-16.83;P = 0.049)。在类固醇组中,与 IPF 患者相比,非 IPF 患者的全因死亡风险似乎有所降低(HR 0.21;95% CI 0.04-0.96;P = 0.04)。类固醇组患者的中位生存期缩短(221 天对 520.5 天),全因死亡风险增加(HR 3.25;95% CI 1.56-6.77;P在这项由 107 名患者组成的双中心回顾性研究中,尽管进行了类固醇治疗,AE-FILD 仍显示出较高的死亡风险,其水平与 AE-IPF 相似。临床医生应考虑导致病情恶化的其他诱发因素,并慎重使用类固醇。需要进一步开展前瞻性试验,以确定皮质类固醇在 AE-FILD 中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respirology
Respirology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and clinically-relevant experimental respiratory biology and disease. Fields of research include immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, paediatric respiratory medicine, clinical trials, interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and publishes papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Editorials, Reviews, and Correspondences. Respirology is the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, has been adopted as the preferred English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and is an official journal of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology.
期刊最新文献
Correction to APSR Annual Conference - 28th Congress of the Asian Pacific Society of Respirology, 7-10 November 2024, Hong Kong. Respirology 29 (Suppl. 3). COPD is associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk independent of phenotype. Letter from Indonesia. Effects of home-based telerehabilitation-assisted inspiratory muscle training in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A randomized controlled trial. Lung cancer (internet-based) Delphi (LUCiD): A modified eDelphi consensus process to establish Australasian clinical quality indicators for thoracic cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1