Development, feasibility, and acceptability of a process based intervention to decrease internalized ageism.

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION Pub Date : 2024-06-02 DOI:10.1080/02701960.2024.2360395
Dallas J Murphy, Michelle M Porter, Corey S Mackenzie, Judith G Chipperfield
{"title":"Development, feasibility, and acceptability of a process based intervention to decrease internalized ageism.","authors":"Dallas J Murphy, Michelle M Porter, Corey S Mackenzie, Judith G Chipperfield","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2024.2360395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A lifetime of exposure to ageism may be internalized in older adults, and these ageist beliefs that are directed inwards can have severe consequences. However, research on reducing internalized ageism is scarce. To address this, we designed and implemented a six-week online process-based intervention to reduce internalized ageism and to assess its feasibility. The intervention utilized a process-based therapy approach targeting psychological, behavioral, and physiological pathways through which internalized ageism negatively impacts health, as specified by stereotype embodiment theory. Intervention components included education, acceptance and commitment therapy techniques, and attributional retraining. A total of 81 older adult participants participated in the feasibility study. Most participants rated each session and the overall program as very useful after each session (average program usefulness rating of 4.54/5). Participants also attributed a wide range of novel behaviors to this intervention and stated that they felt it changed their perspectives on ageism and/or internalized ageism. Results from this study provide a promising foundation from which to advance research on interventions that address internalized ageism - a problem that has severe consequences on the health and well-being of growing numbers of older adults globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2024.2360395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A lifetime of exposure to ageism may be internalized in older adults, and these ageist beliefs that are directed inwards can have severe consequences. However, research on reducing internalized ageism is scarce. To address this, we designed and implemented a six-week online process-based intervention to reduce internalized ageism and to assess its feasibility. The intervention utilized a process-based therapy approach targeting psychological, behavioral, and physiological pathways through which internalized ageism negatively impacts health, as specified by stereotype embodiment theory. Intervention components included education, acceptance and commitment therapy techniques, and attributional retraining. A total of 81 older adult participants participated in the feasibility study. Most participants rated each session and the overall program as very useful after each session (average program usefulness rating of 4.54/5). Participants also attributed a wide range of novel behaviors to this intervention and stated that they felt it changed their perspectives on ageism and/or internalized ageism. Results from this study provide a promising foundation from which to advance research on interventions that address internalized ageism - a problem that has severe consequences on the health and well-being of growing numbers of older adults globally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于过程的干预措施的开发、可行性和可接受性,以减少内化的年龄歧视。
老年人一生中都会受到老龄歧视的影响,而这些内向的老龄歧视观念可能会产生严重的后果。然而,有关减少内化年龄歧视的研究却很少。为了解决这个问题,我们设计并实施了一项为期六周的基于过程的在线干预,以减少内化的年龄歧视,并评估其可行性。该干预采用了基于过程的治疗方法,针对内化年龄歧视对健康产生负面影响的心理、行为和生理途径,正如刻板印象体现理论所指出的那样。干预内容包括教育、接受和承诺疗法技术以及归因再训练。共有 81 名老年人参加了可行性研究。大多数参与者在每节课后都认为每节课和整个项目都非常有用(项目有用性平均评分为 4.54/5)。参与者还将一系列新颖的行为归功于这项干预措施,并表示他们觉得这项干预措施改变了他们对年龄歧视和/或内化年龄歧视的看法。这项研究的结果为推动解决内化年龄歧视问题的干预研究奠定了良好的基础,而内化年龄歧视问题对全球越来越多的老年人的健康和福祉造成了严重影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
期刊最新文献
Transforming perspectives on aging: educational, professional, and research innovations to address ageism. Geriatrics Connect: countering ageism in first-year medical students with longitudinal telephonic relationships. Developing a community advisory board to combat ageism: process and preliminary outcomes. Emeriti professors' perceptions: qualitative research exploring involvement in university activities. Factors related to benevolent and hostile ageism among paramedical students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1