[Numerical simulation in musculoskeletal biomechanics : Application perspectives and possibilities].

Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1007/s00132-024-04515-5
Maeruan Kebbach, Lucie Hucke, Daniel Kluess, Jörg Miehling, David Scherb, Sandro Wartzack, Iris Wechsler, Andreas Wittek, Matthias Woiczinski, Michael Schwarze
{"title":"[Numerical simulation in musculoskeletal biomechanics : Application perspectives and possibilities].","authors":"Maeruan Kebbach, Lucie Hucke, Daniel Kluess, Jörg Miehling, David Scherb, Sandro Wartzack, Iris Wechsler, Andreas Wittek, Matthias Woiczinski, Michael Schwarze","doi":"10.1007/s00132-024-04515-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Computational research methods, such as finite element analysis (FEA) and musculoskeletal multi-body simulation (MBS), are important in musculoskeletal biomechanics because they enable a better understanding of the mechanics of the musculoskeletal system, as well as the development and evaluation of orthopaedic implants. These methods are used to analyze clinically relevant issues in various anatomical regions, such as the hip, knee, shoulder joints and spine. Preoperative simulation can improve surgical planning in orthopaedics and predict individual results.</p><p><strong>Examples from practice: </strong>In this article, the methods of FE analysis and MBS are explained using two practical examples, and the activities of the \"Numerical Simulation\" cluster of the \"Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Network (MSB-NET)\" are presented in more detail. An outlook classifies numerical simulation in the age of artificial intelligence and draws attention to the relevance of simulation in the (re)approval of implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":74375,"journal":{"name":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"487-493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-024-04515-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Computational research methods, such as finite element analysis (FEA) and musculoskeletal multi-body simulation (MBS), are important in musculoskeletal biomechanics because they enable a better understanding of the mechanics of the musculoskeletal system, as well as the development and evaluation of orthopaedic implants. These methods are used to analyze clinically relevant issues in various anatomical regions, such as the hip, knee, shoulder joints and spine. Preoperative simulation can improve surgical planning in orthopaedics and predict individual results.

Examples from practice: In this article, the methods of FE analysis and MBS are explained using two practical examples, and the activities of the "Numerical Simulation" cluster of the "Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Network (MSB-NET)" are presented in more detail. An outlook classifies numerical simulation in the age of artificial intelligence and draws attention to the relevance of simulation in the (re)approval of implants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[肌肉骨骼生物力学中的数值模拟:应用前景与可能性]。
背景:有限元分析(FEA)和肌肉骨骼多体模拟(MBS)等计算研究方法在肌肉骨骼生物力学中非常重要,因为这些方法可以更好地理解肌肉骨骼系统的力学原理,并开发和评估矫形外科植入物。这些方法用于分析髋关节、膝关节、肩关节和脊柱等不同解剖区域的临床相关问题。术前模拟可以改善矫形外科的手术规划,并预测个体结果:在这篇文章中,通过两个实际例子解释了 FE 分析和 MBS 方法,并更详细地介绍了 "肌肉骨骼生物力学研究网络 (MSB-NET) "中 "数值模拟 "组的活动。展望了人工智能时代的数值模拟分类,并提请注意模拟在(重新)批准植入物方面的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thrombophilia, hypofibrinolysis and osteonecrosis. [Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in obesity]. Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid versus plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials : A meta-analysis. [Surgical treatment strategies for periprosthetic femoral fractures of type Vancouver B]. [New technologies in total knee arthroplasty : Current concepts and personalized treatment strategies].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1