Abstract 261: Improving Hypertension Control Among an Underserved Urban Patient Population

S. Anand, Yeriko Santillan, Ameesh Isaath, T. Goldberg, Dipal Patel
{"title":"Abstract 261: Improving Hypertension Control Among an Underserved Urban Patient Population","authors":"S. Anand, Yeriko Santillan, Ameesh Isaath, T. Goldberg, Dipal Patel","doi":"10.1161/hcq.13.suppl_1.261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Needs and Objectives:\n Poorly-controlled hypertension is associated with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and thus is an important healthcare quality metric for primary care practices. Yet achieving blood pressure goals among socially-complex, economically-disadvantaged patient populations can be challenging due to cost-related non-adherence, poor health literacy and other social determinant barriers. Indeed, by early 2019, only 59% of hypertensive patients at our inner-city community health clinic had a blood pressure less than 140/90. The goal of this resident-driven quality improvement (QI) project was to increase blood pressure control among our hypertensive patients to a network target of 75% over 6 months.\n \n \n Setting and Participants:\n Our project was implemented at the Ryan Adair Center, a Federally Qualified Health Center located in Central Harlem that serves as a primary care practice site for Internal Medicine residents. The patient population consists predominantly of Black and Latino patients, most of whom are on Medicaid and live well below the federal poverty line. Our target population was hypertensive patients.\n \n \n Intervention:\n We used the Plan-Do-Study-Act method to carry out our clinic-based project. PGY1’s at the site served as the QI project leaders with faculty oversight. Cycle 1 focused on nurse education regarding proper blood pressure measurement. Cycle 2 focused on home blood pressure monitoring including patient education on proper technique and the importance of maintaining a daily log. Cycle 3 focused on assessment of health literacy via a patient questionnaire. Cycle 4 focused on provider education by ensuring that our patients were prescribed an appropriate medication regimen based on ACC/AHA Guidelines. Cycle 5 focused on referring patients with continued poor control to community health coaches to identify barriers like nutrition, medication access, and health literacy.\n \n \n Evaluation:\n Using our clinic’s online hypertensive registry (DRVS), we tracked on a monthly basis the percentage of hypertensive patients who had controlled blood pressure (<140/90). Percent of patients at goal went from 59% in February 2019 to 73% in July 2019.\n \n \n Discussion/lessons learned:\n Through this project, we demonstrated a meaningful improvement in hypertensive control among an economically-disadvantaged, racially diverse urban patient population. Accurate nurse measurements, engagement of patients in self-management, and resident education on evidence-based medication standards have all contributed to this success. Future directions will explore the impact of community health coaches in hypertension control and use of standard questionnaire to assess health literacy.\n","PeriodicalId":10239,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":"41 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/hcq.13.suppl_1.261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Needs and Objectives: Poorly-controlled hypertension is associated with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and thus is an important healthcare quality metric for primary care practices. Yet achieving blood pressure goals among socially-complex, economically-disadvantaged patient populations can be challenging due to cost-related non-adherence, poor health literacy and other social determinant barriers. Indeed, by early 2019, only 59% of hypertensive patients at our inner-city community health clinic had a blood pressure less than 140/90. The goal of this resident-driven quality improvement (QI) project was to increase blood pressure control among our hypertensive patients to a network target of 75% over 6 months. Setting and Participants: Our project was implemented at the Ryan Adair Center, a Federally Qualified Health Center located in Central Harlem that serves as a primary care practice site for Internal Medicine residents. The patient population consists predominantly of Black and Latino patients, most of whom are on Medicaid and live well below the federal poverty line. Our target population was hypertensive patients. Intervention: We used the Plan-Do-Study-Act method to carry out our clinic-based project. PGY1’s at the site served as the QI project leaders with faculty oversight. Cycle 1 focused on nurse education regarding proper blood pressure measurement. Cycle 2 focused on home blood pressure monitoring including patient education on proper technique and the importance of maintaining a daily log. Cycle 3 focused on assessment of health literacy via a patient questionnaire. Cycle 4 focused on provider education by ensuring that our patients were prescribed an appropriate medication regimen based on ACC/AHA Guidelines. Cycle 5 focused on referring patients with continued poor control to community health coaches to identify barriers like nutrition, medication access, and health literacy. Evaluation: Using our clinic’s online hypertensive registry (DRVS), we tracked on a monthly basis the percentage of hypertensive patients who had controlled blood pressure (<140/90). Percent of patients at goal went from 59% in February 2019 to 73% in July 2019. Discussion/lessons learned: Through this project, we demonstrated a meaningful improvement in hypertensive control among an economically-disadvantaged, racially diverse urban patient population. Accurate nurse measurements, engagement of patients in self-management, and resident education on evidence-based medication standards have all contributed to this success. Future directions will explore the impact of community health coaches in hypertension control and use of standard questionnaire to assess health literacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要 261:改善服务不足的城市患者群体的高血压控制情况
需求和目标:高血压控制不佳与不良心血管后果的风险增加有关,因此是初级保健实践中一项重要的医疗质量指标。然而,由于与费用相关的非依从性、健康知识匮乏以及其他社会决定因素的障碍,在社会复杂、经济条件不利的患者群体中实现血压目标可能具有挑战性。事实上,到 2019 年初,我们市内社区卫生诊所只有 59% 的高血压患者血压低于 140/90。这个由居民推动的质量改进(QI)项目的目标是在 6 个月内将高血压患者的血压控制率提高到 75% 的网络目标。 地点和参与者:我们的项目在瑞安-阿代尔中心(Ryan Adair Center)实施,该中心是位于哈林区中心的联邦合格医疗中心,是内科住院医师的初级保健实践基地。这里的病人主要是黑人和拉丁裔病人,其中大多数人都享受医疗补助,生活水平远远低于联邦贫困线。我们的目标人群是高血压患者。 干预措施我们采用 "计划-实施-研究-行动 "的方法开展诊所项目。医疗点的 PGY1 担任 QI 项目负责人,并由教师进行监督。周期 1 的重点是对护士进行有关正确测量血压的教育。周期 2 侧重于家庭血压监测,包括向患者传授正确的测量技巧和保持每日记录的重要性。周期 3 的重点是通过患者问卷评估健康素养。周期 4 的重点是对医疗服务提供者进行教育,确保根据 ACC/AHA 指南为患者开具适当的药物治疗方案。第 5 个周期的重点是将血压控制仍然不佳的患者转介给社区健康指导员,以识别营养、用药和健康知识等方面的障碍。 评估:我们利用诊所的在线高血压登记系统 (DRVS),每月跟踪血压得到控制(<140/90)的高血压患者比例。达到目标的患者比例从 2019 年 2 月的 59% 上升到 2019 年 7 月的 73%。 讨论/经验教训:通过该项目,我们展示了在经济条件较差、种族多元化的城市患者群体中,高血压控制情况得到了显著改善。护士的精确测量、患者的自我管理以及住院医师对循证用药标准的教育都为这一成功做出了贡献。未来将探索社区健康指导对高血压控制的影响,并使用标准问卷评估健康素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future of Patient-Reported Outcomes: Bringing Patients' Voices Into Health Care. Do Current Clinical Guidelines Set Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Up to Fail? Insights From the ORBITA-2 Trial. ORBITA Trials Are Not Justification to Promote a PCI-First Strategy in Nonacute Myocardial Ischemic Syndromes. Arguing Angina: ORBITA's Challenge to Conventional Wisdom on PCI. Unequal Management and Outcomes Among Asian American Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1