Quality of Life among Patients Undergoing Haemodialysis in Bandung: A Mixed Methods Study

Kustimah Kustimah, A. G. P. Siswadi, A. Djunaidi, A. Iskandarsyah
{"title":"Quality of Life among Patients Undergoing Haemodialysis in Bandung: A Mixed Methods Study","authors":"Kustimah Kustimah, A. G. P. Siswadi, A. Djunaidi, A. Iskandarsyah","doi":"10.24198/jkp.v8i1.1330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quality of life (QoL) has become one of important outcome measures of renal replacement therapy, including haemodialysis. However, the assessment of QoL is not comprehensively measured and most research about it use quantitative approach. Since QoL is subjective, assessing and understanding the qualitative evidence are very important. This study aimed to explore QoL in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing haemodialysis. This research is a cross-sectional study used a mixed method approach. Patients undergoing dialysis were recruited from the dialysis unit in one private hospital in Bandung. They completed the Kidney Disease and Quality of Life (KDQOL-36™) questionnaire and then went on face to face interview. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis with qualitative data analysis software. A total of 87 patients completed the questionnaires and 34 of them participated in 20-60 minutes interview. The symptom and problem list had the highest mean score (M= M=63.60), indicated that patients experienced lack of energy, mobility and physical appearance that further produced difficulties in their daily activities. Additionally, mental component summary showed a higher mean score (M=49.23) than the physical component (M=36.22) indicated that patients most likely had worse mental health condition than their general physical health. Worse mental health condition induced with negative feeling among patients. Patient’s inability to do daily activity and change in physical appearance had impact on their confidence for social relationship. Conclusion: ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis were bothered by the symptom of illness and worsen by the negative feelings.","PeriodicalId":506854,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Keperawatan Padjadjaran","volume":"138 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Keperawatan Padjadjaran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/jkp.v8i1.1330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Quality of life (QoL) has become one of important outcome measures of renal replacement therapy, including haemodialysis. However, the assessment of QoL is not comprehensively measured and most research about it use quantitative approach. Since QoL is subjective, assessing and understanding the qualitative evidence are very important. This study aimed to explore QoL in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing haemodialysis. This research is a cross-sectional study used a mixed method approach. Patients undergoing dialysis were recruited from the dialysis unit in one private hospital in Bandung. They completed the Kidney Disease and Quality of Life (KDQOL-36™) questionnaire and then went on face to face interview. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis with qualitative data analysis software. A total of 87 patients completed the questionnaires and 34 of them participated in 20-60 minutes interview. The symptom and problem list had the highest mean score (M= M=63.60), indicated that patients experienced lack of energy, mobility and physical appearance that further produced difficulties in their daily activities. Additionally, mental component summary showed a higher mean score (M=49.23) than the physical component (M=36.22) indicated that patients most likely had worse mental health condition than their general physical health. Worse mental health condition induced with negative feeling among patients. Patient’s inability to do daily activity and change in physical appearance had impact on their confidence for social relationship. Conclusion: ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis were bothered by the symptom of illness and worsen by the negative feelings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
万隆血液透析患者的生活质量:混合方法研究
生活质量(QoL)已成为包括血液透析在内的肾脏替代疗法的重要衡量指标之一。然而,对 QoL 的评估并不全面,大多数相关研究都采用定量方法。由于 QoL 具有主观性,因此评估和了解定性证据非常重要。本研究旨在探讨接受血液透析的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的 QoL。本研究是一项横断面研究,采用了混合方法。接受血液透析的患者来自万隆一家私立医院的透析室。他们填写了肾脏疾病和生活质量(KDQOL-36™)问卷,然后进行了面对面的访谈。对定量数据进行描述性分析,对定性数据使用定性数据分析软件进行主题分析。共有 87 名患者填写了问卷,其中 34 人参加了 20-60 分钟的面谈。症状和问题清单的平均得分最高(M= M=63.60),表明患者感到精力不足、行动不便和身体外观不佳,这进一步给他们的日常活动造成了困难。此外,心理部分的平均得分(M=49.23)高于身体部分的平均得分(M=36.22),这表明患者的心理健康状况很可能比一般的身体健康状况更差。较差的心理健康状况会给患者带来负面情绪。患者无法进行日常活动和身体外观的改变影响了他们建立社会关系的信心。结论接受血液透析的 ESRD 患者受到疾病症状的困扰,并因负面情绪而恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Food taboo, dietary diversity and prevalence of chronic energy deficiency in pregnant women living in rural area Indonesia The comfort level in breast cancer patients’ based on patients’ characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic Supportive-educative needs of patients with coronary heart disease: An investigation of clinical nurses Nursing interventions for improving quality of life among patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: A scoping review Association between women’s empowerment and contraceptive failure in Indonesia: 2017 IDHS data analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1