Samoświadomość i sceptycyzm

R. Ziemińska
{"title":"Samoświadomość i sceptycyzm","authors":"R. Ziemińska","doi":"10.24425/pfns.2020.133139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"contemporary skeptical hypotheses have been developed: H. Putnam’s content externalism hypothesis and so-called Kripkenstein’s quus hypothesis. I put forth the question what kind of self is immune to erroneous misidentification. The immunity seems to be limited to the contentless self, reducible to the pre-discursive feeling of one’s own existence. There is no guarantee that any content whatsoever can be attributed to self without error. I cannot negate that I exist any more than I can negate that something external exists, but any description of either is fallible. So the content of self-consciousness is not in an epistemically better position than the content of external perception.","PeriodicalId":371871,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/pfns.2020.133139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

contemporary skeptical hypotheses have been developed: H. Putnam’s content externalism hypothesis and so-called Kripkenstein’s quus hypothesis. I put forth the question what kind of self is immune to erroneous misidentification. The immunity seems to be limited to the contentless self, reducible to the pre-discursive feeling of one’s own existence. There is no guarantee that any content whatsoever can be attributed to self without error. I cannot negate that I exist any more than I can negate that something external exists, but any description of either is fallible. So the content of self-consciousness is not in an epistemically better position than the content of external perception.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我意识和怀疑精神
当代的怀疑论假说已经形成:普特南(H. Putnam)的内容外在论假说和所谓克里普肯斯坦(Kripkenstein)的 "quus "假说。我提出了这样一个问题:什么样的自我才能免受错误识别的影响?这种免疫力似乎仅限于无内容的自我,可还原为对自身存在的前辨识感觉。我们无法保证任何内容都能毫无差错地归因于自我。我无法否定 "我存在",就像我无法否定 "外部事物存在 "一样,但对两者的任何描述都是错误的。因此,自我意识的内容在认识论上并不比外部感知的内容处于更有利的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Jak wychować pacyfistę? Pacyfizm i teoria wychowania Bertranda Russella Luter i Marks W sto pięćdziesiątą rocznicę urodzin Bertranda Russella Russell i Polacy O wiedzy i znajomości
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1