{"title":"The PPT in Post-BEPS Tax Treaty Law: It Is a GAAR but Just a GAAR!","authors":"R. Danon","doi":"10.59403/136hxah","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the author discusses the principal purpose test (PPT) included in article 29 of the OECD and UN Models (2017), arguing in particular that while the PPT certainly permits a purposive interpretation, it may not be used to build into tax treaty law additional requirements that were never intended. Finally, the author concludes by looking at the other side of the coin and wonders whether a comparable “PPT” should not regulate the performance by States of their treaty obligations.","PeriodicalId":516699,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin for International Taxation","volume":" 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin for International Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59403/136hxah","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
In this article, the author discusses the principal purpose test (PPT) included in article 29 of the OECD and UN Models (2017), arguing in particular that while the PPT certainly permits a purposive interpretation, it may not be used to build into tax treaty law additional requirements that were never intended. Finally, the author concludes by looking at the other side of the coin and wonders whether a comparable “PPT” should not regulate the performance by States of their treaty obligations.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
