Emergency general surgery: a ‘state of the nation’ survey

A. Walsh, J. Olivier, O. Old
{"title":"Emergency general surgery: a ‘state of the nation’ survey","authors":"A. Walsh, J. Olivier, O. Old","doi":"10.1308/rcsbull.2024.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many projects seek to improve emergency general surgery (EGS) care across England. However, no study to date has examined how EGS is currently organised or how this is evolving. The aim of this study was to determine the current status of EGS organisation in England, whether this correlates with measures of hospital activity and changes proposed in the future. Surveys were sent to all NHS trusts in England via freedom of information requests. Trusts were given eight weeks to reply. Trust characteristics were ascertained by asking their organisational structure as well as acute bed numbers, number of admissions under general surgery, number of cases submitted to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit in 2021 and whether they planned to start an EGS service within the next five years. Organisational structures were categorised as: a) mixed general surgical take; b) daily allocation to a subspecialty; c) dedicated EGS consultants/service covering weekdays; d) dedicated EGS consultants/service covering weekdays and weekends; or e) other. A total of 101 organisations responded. There were 36 organisations in group A, 16 in group B, 10 in group C, 30 in group D and 5 in group E. Four organisations declined to supply information on organisational structure. No trust characteristic was significantly different between organisational structures. Two-fifths (41%) of the organisations reported having an EGS service in place (groups C and D). Almost a quarter (23%) of those without an EGS service reported plans to implement one within the next five years. Our results indicate a growing trend towards implementing EGS services in England, with over 50% of trusts expected to offer such a service in five years’ time. It is important to pursue a collaborative definition of best practice for EGS to ensure high quality care for patients.","PeriodicalId":258157,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":"8 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsbull.2024.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many projects seek to improve emergency general surgery (EGS) care across England. However, no study to date has examined how EGS is currently organised or how this is evolving. The aim of this study was to determine the current status of EGS organisation in England, whether this correlates with measures of hospital activity and changes proposed in the future. Surveys were sent to all NHS trusts in England via freedom of information requests. Trusts were given eight weeks to reply. Trust characteristics were ascertained by asking their organisational structure as well as acute bed numbers, number of admissions under general surgery, number of cases submitted to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit in 2021 and whether they planned to start an EGS service within the next five years. Organisational structures were categorised as: a) mixed general surgical take; b) daily allocation to a subspecialty; c) dedicated EGS consultants/service covering weekdays; d) dedicated EGS consultants/service covering weekdays and weekends; or e) other. A total of 101 organisations responded. There were 36 organisations in group A, 16 in group B, 10 in group C, 30 in group D and 5 in group E. Four organisations declined to supply information on organisational structure. No trust characteristic was significantly different between organisational structures. Two-fifths (41%) of the organisations reported having an EGS service in place (groups C and D). Almost a quarter (23%) of those without an EGS service reported plans to implement one within the next five years. Our results indicate a growing trend towards implementing EGS services in England, with over 50% of trusts expected to offer such a service in five years’ time. It is important to pursue a collaborative definition of best practice for EGS to ensure high quality care for patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊普通外科:"国家状况 "调查
许多项目旨在改善英格兰的急诊普外科(EGS)护理。然而,迄今为止还没有一项研究探讨过急诊普外科目前是如何组织的,或者是如何发展的。本研究的目的是确定英格兰急诊普外科的组织现状、是否与医院活动的衡量标准相关以及未来的变化建议。我们通过信息自由申请向英格兰所有国家医疗服务系统托管机构发送了调查问卷。信托机构有八周的答复时间。通过询问信托机构的组织结构、急诊病床数量、普通外科入院人数、2021 年提交给国家紧急腹腔手术审核的病例数量以及是否计划在未来五年内启动 EGS 服务,确定了信托机构的特征。组织结构分为:a) 普通外科混合;b) 每天分配到一个亚专科;c) 专门的 EGS 顾问/服务覆盖工作日;d) 专门的 EGS 顾问/服务覆盖工作日和周末;或 e) 其他。共有 101 家机构作出回应。A 组有 36 家,B 组有 16 家,C 组有 10 家,D 组有 30 家,E 组有 5 家。不同组织结构的信任特征均无明显差异。五分之二(41%)的机构表示已开展了电子政府服务(C 组和 D 组)。近四分之一(23%)的未设立 EGS 服务的机构表示计划在未来五年内实施 EGS 服务。我们的研究结果表明,英格兰实施 EGS 服务的趋势日益明显,预计五年内将有 50% 以上的医疗机构提供此类服务。为确保为患者提供高质量的医疗服务,共同定义 EGS 的最佳实践非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Volunteers at the RCS England museums Will artificial intelligence lead to new jobs in healthcare? An interview with Miss Samantha Tross Your College wants you! Diabetes in the UK: a volunteer spreading awareness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1