Student’s creative thinking based on study level, learning style, gender, and combination of the three

Edwin Musdi, A. R. As'ari, Yulyanti Harisman, Hamdani Syaputra, Kelly Angelly Hevardani
{"title":"Student’s creative thinking based on study level, learning style, gender, and combination of the three","authors":"Edwin Musdi, A. R. As'ari, Yulyanti Harisman, Hamdani Syaputra, Kelly Angelly Hevardani","doi":"10.11591/ijere.v13i3.27936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All students from every level of education should have excellent and adequate creative thinking, but in Indonesia students’ creative thinking is still low. There are a lot of factors that affect creative thinking, such as learning styles. This study aimed to investigate the comparison of students’ creative thinking based on study level and learning styles, gender, and the combination of the three to determine which factor or type of students needs to be improved. This research uses a statistics descriptive method. The participants of this study were 38 senior high school students, 35 students of the teacher professional program (PPG), 24 undergraduate students (S1), and 12 master program students (S2). The instrument used in this study is a learning styles Learning style test to determine the student’s learning styles and creative thinking questions to classify the students. The results of this study are i) Students’ level of study does not determine their creativity level; ii) Based on gender, female is more creative than a man; iii) Based on the learning style, visual students is the best, followed by kinesthetic and auditory in order; and iv) Merdeka curriculum of Indonesia, nowadays, is essential to make the best learning process to improve students’ creative thinking.","PeriodicalId":517136,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)","volume":"8 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.27936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All students from every level of education should have excellent and adequate creative thinking, but in Indonesia students’ creative thinking is still low. There are a lot of factors that affect creative thinking, such as learning styles. This study aimed to investigate the comparison of students’ creative thinking based on study level and learning styles, gender, and the combination of the three to determine which factor or type of students needs to be improved. This research uses a statistics descriptive method. The participants of this study were 38 senior high school students, 35 students of the teacher professional program (PPG), 24 undergraduate students (S1), and 12 master program students (S2). The instrument used in this study is a learning styles Learning style test to determine the student’s learning styles and creative thinking questions to classify the students. The results of this study are i) Students’ level of study does not determine their creativity level; ii) Based on gender, female is more creative than a man; iii) Based on the learning style, visual students is the best, followed by kinesthetic and auditory in order; and iv) Merdeka curriculum of Indonesia, nowadays, is essential to make the best learning process to improve students’ creative thinking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于学习水平、学习方式、性别以及三者结合的学生创造性思维方式
各个教育阶段的所有学生都应具备优秀而充分的创造性思维,但印尼学生的创造性思维水平仍然很低。影响创造性思维的因素有很多,比如学习风格。本研究旨在调查基于学习水平和学习风格、性别以及三者结合的学生创造性思维的比较,以确定哪种因素或哪类学生需要改进。本研究采用统计描述法。本研究的参与者为 38 名高中生、35 名教师专业课程(PPG)学生、24 名本科生(S1)和 12 名硕士课程学生(S2)。本研究使用的工具是学习风格学习风格测试,以确定学生的学习风格,并使用创造性思维问题对学生进行分类。本研究的结果是:i) 学生的学习水平并不决定他们的创造力水平;ii) 从性别来看,女性比男性更有创造力;iii) 从学习风格来看,视觉型学生的学习风格最好,其次是动觉型和听觉型;iv) 如今,印尼的默迪卡课程是提高学生创造性思维的最佳学习过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge skills during teaching practicum English as a foreign language lecturers’ language power bases in the high context culture of Toraja Early childhood education pre-service teachers’ perception of outdoor learning A systematic literature review: how do we support students to become numerate? Differentiated instruction in reading in elementary schools: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1