Total blastocyst usable rate is a predictor of cumulative live birth rate in IVF cycles

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102809
M. Chaillot , A. Reignier , T. Fréour
{"title":"Total blastocyst usable rate is a predictor of cumulative live birth rate in IVF cycles","authors":"M. Chaillot ,&nbsp;A. Reignier ,&nbsp;T. Fréour","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Despite advances in IVF techniques, determining the prognostic factors influencing cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) remains crucial for optimizing outcomes. Among the various key performance indicators in the lab, blastulation rate, and more specifically Total Blastocyst Usable Rate (TBUR), has gained particular interest. In this study we aimed at determining if TBUR was significantly associated with CLBR.</p></div><div><h3>Basic procedures</h3><p>This monocentric retrospective case-control study was conducted in 317 consecutive IVF/ICSI cycles in 2014–2020 and leading to the formation of 3 usable blastocysts, including freeze all cycles. TBUR (usable blastocysts / 2PNs) was calculated and CLBR after 2-year follow up was recorded, including both fresh and frozen embyro transfers. CLBR was then compared between 2 groups according to TBUR (group 1: TBUR ≥50 % vs group 2: TBUR ≤30 %).</p></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><p>CLBR was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (57 vs. 41 %, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Adjusted logistic regression showed a statistically significant relationship between CLBR and TBUR, with a significantly lower chance of achieving a live birth in group 2 than in group 1 (OR = 0.408 [0.17–0.96]; <em>p</em> = 0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><p>Although the monocentric design and the arbitrary choice of thresholds for TBUR and number of blastocysts call for caution when generalizing the findings and advocates for external validation, our results illustrate that TBUR is a valuable prognostic factor of CLBR in IVF cycles which might serve as a tool for lab monitoring, cycle analysis by medical staff and patients’ counselling. These results fit well within the P4 medicine concept (Predictive, Preventive, Personalized, and Participatory), and advocate for further research in order to improve embryo culture conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 8","pages":"Article 102809"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000874","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Despite advances in IVF techniques, determining the prognostic factors influencing cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) remains crucial for optimizing outcomes. Among the various key performance indicators in the lab, blastulation rate, and more specifically Total Blastocyst Usable Rate (TBUR), has gained particular interest. In this study we aimed at determining if TBUR was significantly associated with CLBR.

Basic procedures

This monocentric retrospective case-control study was conducted in 317 consecutive IVF/ICSI cycles in 2014–2020 and leading to the formation of 3 usable blastocysts, including freeze all cycles. TBUR (usable blastocysts / 2PNs) was calculated and CLBR after 2-year follow up was recorded, including both fresh and frozen embyro transfers. CLBR was then compared between 2 groups according to TBUR (group 1: TBUR ≥50 % vs group 2: TBUR ≤30 %).

Main findings

CLBR was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (57 vs. 41 %, p = 0.02). Adjusted logistic regression showed a statistically significant relationship between CLBR and TBUR, with a significantly lower chance of achieving a live birth in group 2 than in group 1 (OR = 0.408 [0.17–0.96]; p = 0.04).

Principal conclusions

Although the monocentric design and the arbitrary choice of thresholds for TBUR and number of blastocysts call for caution when generalizing the findings and advocates for external validation, our results illustrate that TBUR is a valuable prognostic factor of CLBR in IVF cycles which might serve as a tool for lab monitoring, cycle analysis by medical staff and patients’ counselling. These results fit well within the P4 medicine concept (Predictive, Preventive, Personalized, and Participatory), and advocate for further research in order to improve embryo culture conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
总囊胚可用率是试管婴儿周期累积活产率的预测指标
目的尽管试管婴儿技术不断进步,但确定影响累积活产率(CLBR)的预后因素对于优化结果仍然至关重要。在实验室的各种关键性能指标中,囊胚形成率,特别是总囊胚可用率(TBUR)尤其受到关注。基本程序这项单中心回顾性病例对照研究是在 2014-2020 年连续 317 个 IVF/ICSI 周期中进行的,导致形成 3 个可用囊胚,包括冷冻所有周期。计算了TBUR(可用囊胚/2PNs),并记录了2年随访后的CLBR,包括新鲜和冷冻胚胎移植。然后根据 TBUR(第 1 组:TBUR ≥50 % vs 第 2 组:TBUR ≤30%)将 CLBR 分为两组进行比较。主要结果CLBR 在第 1 组明显高于第 2 组(57 % vs. 41 %,p = 0.02)。调整后的逻辑回归显示,CLBR 与 TBUR 之间存在显著的统计学关系,第 2 组获得活产的几率明显低于第 1 组(OR = 0.408 [0.17-0.96]; p = 0.04)。主要结论尽管单中心设计以及对 TBUR 和囊胚数阈值的任意选择要求在归纳研究结果时保持谨慎,并主张进行外部验证,但我们的结果表明,TBUR 是试管婴儿周期中 CLBR 的一个有价值的预后因素,可作为实验室监测、医务人员周期分析和患者咨询的工具。这些结果与 P4 医学概念(预测性、预防性、个性化和参与性)不谋而合,因此需要进一步研究,以改善胚胎培养条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Retraction notice to “Outcome of Laparoscopic Adhesiolysis in Infertile Patients with Pelvic Adhesions Following Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial” [J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 50 (2021) first page - 101969] Contents Editorial board Improved neonatal outcome following induction of labour using 25 µg versus 50 µg oral Misoprostol: A retrospective, comparative cohort study Predictive performance of sFlt-1, PlGF and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1