Lateral Shuffle-Induced Fatigue Effects on Ankle Proprioception and Countermovement Jump Performance

Mengde Lyu, Zhili Chen, Renhuan Tang, Ling Ding, Shengji Deng, R. Adams, Jia Han, Yongming Li
{"title":"Lateral Shuffle-Induced Fatigue Effects on Ankle Proprioception and Countermovement Jump Performance","authors":"Mengde Lyu, Zhili Chen, Renhuan Tang, Ling Ding, Shengji Deng, R. Adams, Jia Han, Yongming Li","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2024.418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To determine how lateral shuffling/lateral shuffle (LS) -induced fatigue affects ankle proprioception and countermovement jump (CMJ) performance. Eighteen male college athletes performed 6 modes of a repeated LS protocol with 2 distances (2.5 and 5 m) and 3 speeds (1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 m/s). After LS, ankle inversion proprioception (AIP) was measured using the active movement extent discrimination apparatus (AMEDA). CMJ, blood lactate (BLa), heart rate (HR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured before and after LS. The number of changes of direction (CODs) in each protocol was recorded. LS-induced fatigue was evident in BLa, HR and RPE (all p < 0.05), increasing with shorter shuffle distance and faster speed. RM-ANOVA showed a significant distance main effect on both AIP (p < 0.01) and CMJ (p < 0.05), but the speed main effect was only significant for CMJ (p ≤ 0.001), not AIP (p = 0.87). CMJ performance was correlated with BLa, HR and RPE (r values range from –0.62 to -0.32, all p ≤ 0.001). AIP was only correlated with CODs (r = -0.251, p < 0.01). These results suggested that in LS, shorter distance, regardless of speed, was associated with worse AIP, whereas subsequent CMJ performance was affected by both LS distance and speed. Hence, AIP performance was not related to physiological fatigue, but CMJ performance was. Results imply that LS affects processing proprioceptive input and producing muscular output differently, and that these two aspects of neuromuscular control are affected by physiological fatigue to varying degrees. These findings have implications for injury prevention and performance enhancement.","PeriodicalId":506848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine how lateral shuffling/lateral shuffle (LS) -induced fatigue affects ankle proprioception and countermovement jump (CMJ) performance. Eighteen male college athletes performed 6 modes of a repeated LS protocol with 2 distances (2.5 and 5 m) and 3 speeds (1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 m/s). After LS, ankle inversion proprioception (AIP) was measured using the active movement extent discrimination apparatus (AMEDA). CMJ, blood lactate (BLa), heart rate (HR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured before and after LS. The number of changes of direction (CODs) in each protocol was recorded. LS-induced fatigue was evident in BLa, HR and RPE (all p < 0.05), increasing with shorter shuffle distance and faster speed. RM-ANOVA showed a significant distance main effect on both AIP (p < 0.01) and CMJ (p < 0.05), but the speed main effect was only significant for CMJ (p ≤ 0.001), not AIP (p = 0.87). CMJ performance was correlated with BLa, HR and RPE (r values range from –0.62 to -0.32, all p ≤ 0.001). AIP was only correlated with CODs (r = -0.251, p < 0.01). These results suggested that in LS, shorter distance, regardless of speed, was associated with worse AIP, whereas subsequent CMJ performance was affected by both LS distance and speed. Hence, AIP performance was not related to physiological fatigue, but CMJ performance was. Results imply that LS affects processing proprioceptive input and producing muscular output differently, and that these two aspects of neuromuscular control are affected by physiological fatigue to varying degrees. These findings have implications for injury prevention and performance enhancement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侧向沙狐运动引起的疲劳对踝关节直觉和反向运动跳跃成绩的影响
目的:确定侧向洗牌/侧向洗牌(LS)引起的疲劳如何影响踝关节本体感觉和反向运动跳跃(CMJ)成绩。18 名男子大学生运动员进行了 6 种模式的重复 LS 方案,包括 2 种距离(2.5 米和 5 米)和 3 种速度(1.6 米/秒、1.8 米/秒和 2.0 米/秒)。LS 结束后,使用主动运动范围辨别仪器(AMEDA)测量了踝关节内翻本体感觉(AIP)。在 LS 前后测量了 CMJ、血乳酸(BLa)、心率(HR)和体力消耗等级(RPE)。记录了每个方案中的方向变化次数(COD)。LS引起的疲劳在BLa、HR和RPE中都很明显(均P < 0.05),随着洗牌距离缩短和速度加快而增加。RM-ANOVA显示,距离主效应对AIP(p < 0.01)和CMJ(p < 0.05)有显著影响,但速度主效应仅对CMJ(p ≤ 0.001)有显著影响,对AIP(p = 0.87)无显著影响。CMJ 成绩与 BLa、HR 和 RPE 相关(r 值范围为 -0.62 至 -0.32,所有 p 均小于 0.001)。AIP 仅与 CODs 相关(r = -0.251,p < 0.01)。这些结果表明,在 LS 中,较短的距离(无论速度如何)与较差的 AIP 相关,而随后的 CMJ 成绩则同时受到 LS 距离和速度的影响。因此,AIP成绩与生理疲劳无关,但CMJ成绩与生理疲劳有关。研究结果表明,LS 对本体感觉输入的处理和肌肉输出的影响是不同的,神经肌肉控制的这两个方面在不同程度上受到生理疲劳的影响。这些发现对预防损伤和提高运动表现具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal Prescription for Superior Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of Inter-Individual Variability in Adaptations to Small-Sided Games and Short Sprint Interval Training in Young Basketball Players Combined Aerobic and Resistance Training Improves Body Composition, Alters Cardiometabolic Risk, and Ameliorates Cancer-Related Indicators in Breast Cancer Patients and Survivors with Overweight/Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Thoracolumbar Fascia and Lumbar Muscle Stiffness in Athletes with A History of Hamstring Injury Race Dynamics in Triathlon Mixed-Team-Relay Meaningfully Changes with The New Regulation Towards Paris 2024 Neuromechanical Differences between Pronated and Supinated Forearm Positions during Upper-Body Wingate Tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1