Medical cannabis and its efficacy/effectiveness on the management of osteoarthritis pain and function.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2024.2363945
Cerina Dubois, Elizabeth C Danielson, Molly Beestrum, Dean T Eurich
{"title":"Medical cannabis and its efficacy/effectiveness on the management of osteoarthritis pain and function.","authors":"Cerina Dubois, Elizabeth C Danielson, Molly Beestrum, Dean T Eurich","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2363945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite pharmacological treatments for osteoarthritis (OA), more individuals are choosing medical cannabis for OA symptom management and for mitigating opioid prescriptions for OA. This systematic review examines the global evidence of medical cannabis use on OA pain and function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search was completed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and CINAHL within the past 10 years (2012-2022). We limited the search to English language articles. We did not include grey literature or case studies. Participant demographics included all adult individuals with OA who were using medical cannabis for OA. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework; and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. We used a narrative synthesis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 7 studies were included: 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 5 observational studies. Only 1 of the 2 RCTs reported improvements in pain for cannabis users. All 5 observational studies reported an improvement in pain levels, reduction of opioid use, and/or improvement in overall OA function. Despite high risk of bias ratings and low study quality, the consensus across studies was that medical cannabis use was effective for a subgroup of individuals suffering from OA pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is low quality evidence to support medical cannabis use as a substitute for primary pharmacological treatment of OA. However, this does not negate the observations that medical cannabis may provide therapeutic relief for a subset of patients.</p><p><strong>Systematic review propsero registration: </strong>CRD42022354026.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1195-1202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2363945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite pharmacological treatments for osteoarthritis (OA), more individuals are choosing medical cannabis for OA symptom management and for mitigating opioid prescriptions for OA. This systematic review examines the global evidence of medical cannabis use on OA pain and function.

Methods: The search was completed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and CINAHL within the past 10 years (2012-2022). We limited the search to English language articles. We did not include grey literature or case studies. Participant demographics included all adult individuals with OA who were using medical cannabis for OA. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework; and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. We used a narrative synthesis approach.

Results: Overall, 7 studies were included: 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 5 observational studies. Only 1 of the 2 RCTs reported improvements in pain for cannabis users. All 5 observational studies reported an improvement in pain levels, reduction of opioid use, and/or improvement in overall OA function. Despite high risk of bias ratings and low study quality, the consensus across studies was that medical cannabis use was effective for a subgroup of individuals suffering from OA pain.

Conclusions: There is low quality evidence to support medical cannabis use as a substitute for primary pharmacological treatment of OA. However, this does not negate the observations that medical cannabis may provide therapeutic relief for a subset of patients.

Systematic review propsero registration: CRD42022354026.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医用大麻及其对骨关节炎疼痛和功能的疗效。
目的:尽管对骨关节炎(OA)有药物治疗,但越来越多的人选择医用大麻来控制 OA 症状和减少 OA 的阿片类药物处方。本系统综述研究了使用医用大麻治疗 OA 疼痛和功能的全球证据:在 MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase 和 CINAHL 中完成了过去 10 年(2012-2022 年)的检索。我们仅限于搜索英文文章。我们不包括灰色文献或病例研究。参与者的人口统计学特征包括所有使用医用大麻治疗 OA 的成年 OA 患者。我们使用 "建议、评估、开发和评价分级 "框架和 "干预措施非随机研究中的偏倚风险 "工具对研究质量和偏倚风险进行了评估。我们采用了叙事综合法:结果:共纳入 7 项研究:结果:共纳入了 7 项研究:2 项随机对照试验 (RCT) 和 5 项观察性研究。2 项随机对照试验中只有 1 项报告了大麻使用者的疼痛有所改善。所有 5 项观察性研究都报告了疼痛程度的改善、阿片类药物使用的减少和/或 OA 整体功能的改善。尽管存在较高的偏倚风险和较低的研究质量,但各项研究一致认为,使用医用大麻对患有 OA 疼痛的亚群体有效:支持使用医用大麻替代 OA 初级药物治疗的证据质量不高。然而,这并不能否定医用大麻可为部分患者提供治疗缓解的观察结果:CRD42022354026。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
期刊最新文献
Improving cardiovascular risk prediction in metabolic liver disease with a novel biomarker-enhanced model. Prevalence of bowel urgency and its association with quality of life and disease severity among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: results from the real-world measuring urgency symptoms in inflammatory bowel disease collaboration (MUSIC) online study. Correction. Comorbidity and comedication burden in people living with HIV in the United States: updated findings from a contemporary cohort (2020-2024). Reproducibility of blood pressure variability assessed by home blood pressure monitoring.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1