Opioid Use Prior to Adult Spine Deformity Correction Surgery is Associated With Worse Pre- and Postoperative Back Pain and Prolonged Opioid Demands.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1177/21925682241261662
Juan P Sardi, Justin S Smith, Jeffrey L Gum, Brett Rocos, Anastasios Charalampidis, Lawrence G Lenke, Christopher I Shaffrey, Kenneth M C Cheung, Yong Qiu, Yukihiro Matsuyama, Ferran Pellisé, David W Polly, Jonathan N Sembrano, Benny T Dahl, Michael P Kelly, Marinus de Kleuver, Maarten Spruit, Ahmet Alanay, Sigurd H Berven, Stephen J Lewis
{"title":"Opioid Use Prior to Adult Spine Deformity Correction Surgery is Associated With Worse Pre- and Postoperative Back Pain and Prolonged Opioid Demands.","authors":"Juan P Sardi, Justin S Smith, Jeffrey L Gum, Brett Rocos, Anastasios Charalampidis, Lawrence G Lenke, Christopher I Shaffrey, Kenneth M C Cheung, Yong Qiu, Yukihiro Matsuyama, Ferran Pellisé, David W Polly, Jonathan N Sembrano, Benny T Dahl, Michael P Kelly, Marinus de Kleuver, Maarten Spruit, Ahmet Alanay, Sigurd H Berven, Stephen J Lewis","doi":"10.1177/21925682241261662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignProspective multicenter database post-hoc analysis.ObjectivesOpioids are frequently prescribed for painful spinal conditions to provide pain relief and to allow for functional improvement, both before and after spine surgery. Amidst a current opioid epidemic, it is important for providers to understand the impact of opioid use and its relationship with patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pre-/postoperative opioid consumption surrounding ASD and assess patient-reported pain outcomes in older patients undergoing surgery for spinal deformity.MethodsPatients ≥60 years of age from 12 international centers undergoing spinal fusion of at least 5 levels and a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Patient-reported outcome scores were collected using the Numeric Rating Scale for back and leg pain (NRS-B; NRS-L) at baseline and at 2 years following surgery. Opioid use, defined based on a specific question on case report forms and question 11 from the SRS-22r questionnaire, was assessed at baseline and at 2-year follow-up.ResultOf the 219 patients who met inclusion criteria, 179 (81.7%) had 2-year data on opioid use. The percentages of patients reporting opioid use at baseline (n = 75, 34.2%) and 2 years after surgery (n = 55, 30.7%) were similar (<i>P</i> = .23). However, at last follow-up 39% of baseline opioid users (Opi) were no longer taking opioids, while 14% of initial non-users (No-Opi) reported opioid use. Regional pre- and postoperative opioid use was 5.8% and 7.7% in the Asian population, 58.3% and 53.1% in the European, and 50.5% and 40.2% in North American patients, respectively. Baseline opioid users reported more preoperative back pain than the No-Opi group (7.0 vs 5.7, <i>P</i> = .001), while NRS-Leg pain scores were comparable (4.8 vs 4, <i>P</i> = .159). Similarly, at last follow-up, patients in the Opi group had greater NRS-B scores than Non-Opi patients (3.2 vs 2.3, <i>P</i> = .012), but no differences in NRS-Leg pain scores (2.2 vs 2.4, <i>P</i> = .632) were observed.ConclusionsIn this study, almost one-third of surgical ASD patients were consuming opioids both pre- and postoperatively world-wide. There were marked international variations, with patients from Asia having a much lower usage rate, suggesting a cultural influence. Despite both opioid users and nonusers benefitting from surgery, preoperative opioid use was strongly associated with significantly more back pain at baseline that persisted at 2-year follow up, as well as persistent postoperative opioid needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1749-1759"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241261662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignProspective multicenter database post-hoc analysis.ObjectivesOpioids are frequently prescribed for painful spinal conditions to provide pain relief and to allow for functional improvement, both before and after spine surgery. Amidst a current opioid epidemic, it is important for providers to understand the impact of opioid use and its relationship with patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pre-/postoperative opioid consumption surrounding ASD and assess patient-reported pain outcomes in older patients undergoing surgery for spinal deformity.MethodsPatients ≥60 years of age from 12 international centers undergoing spinal fusion of at least 5 levels and a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Patient-reported outcome scores were collected using the Numeric Rating Scale for back and leg pain (NRS-B; NRS-L) at baseline and at 2 years following surgery. Opioid use, defined based on a specific question on case report forms and question 11 from the SRS-22r questionnaire, was assessed at baseline and at 2-year follow-up.ResultOf the 219 patients who met inclusion criteria, 179 (81.7%) had 2-year data on opioid use. The percentages of patients reporting opioid use at baseline (n = 75, 34.2%) and 2 years after surgery (n = 55, 30.7%) were similar (P = .23). However, at last follow-up 39% of baseline opioid users (Opi) were no longer taking opioids, while 14% of initial non-users (No-Opi) reported opioid use. Regional pre- and postoperative opioid use was 5.8% and 7.7% in the Asian population, 58.3% and 53.1% in the European, and 50.5% and 40.2% in North American patients, respectively. Baseline opioid users reported more preoperative back pain than the No-Opi group (7.0 vs 5.7, P = .001), while NRS-Leg pain scores were comparable (4.8 vs 4, P = .159). Similarly, at last follow-up, patients in the Opi group had greater NRS-B scores than Non-Opi patients (3.2 vs 2.3, P = .012), but no differences in NRS-Leg pain scores (2.2 vs 2.4, P = .632) were observed.ConclusionsIn this study, almost one-third of surgical ASD patients were consuming opioids both pre- and postoperatively world-wide. There were marked international variations, with patients from Asia having a much lower usage rate, suggesting a cultural influence. Despite both opioid users and nonusers benefitting from surgery, preoperative opioid use was strongly associated with significantly more back pain at baseline that persisted at 2-year follow up, as well as persistent postoperative opioid needs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人脊柱畸形矫正手术前使用阿片类药物会导致术前和术后背痛加重以及阿片类药物需求延长。
研究设计前瞻性多中心数据库事后分析:脊柱手术前后,阿片类药物经常被用于治疗脊柱疼痛,以缓解疼痛并改善功能。在当前阿片类药物流行的情况下,医疗机构有必要了解阿片类药物使用的影响及其与患者报告结果之间的关系。本研究旨在评估接受脊柱畸形手术的老年患者术前/术后围绕 ASD 的阿片类药物消耗量,并评估患者报告的疼痛结果:方法:纳入来自12个国际中心的年龄≥60岁、接受至少5级脊柱融合术且随访至少2年的患者。在基线和术后 2 年时,使用腰腿痛数字评分量表(NRS-B;NRS-L)收集患者报告的结果评分。根据病例报告表中的特定问题和SRS-22r问卷中的问题11,在基线和术后2年随访时对阿片类药物的使用情况进行了评估:在符合纳入标准的 219 名患者中,179 人(81.7%)有两年的阿片类药物使用数据。基线(75 人,34.2%)和术后 2 年(55 人,30.7%)报告使用阿片类药物的患者比例相似(P = .23)。然而,在最后一次随访时,39%的阿片类药物基线使用者(Opi)不再服用阿片类药物,而14%的初始非使用者(No-Opi)报告使用了阿片类药物。亚洲患者术前和术后阿片类药物使用率分别为 5.8% 和 7.7%,欧洲患者分别为 58.3% 和 53.1%,北美患者分别为 50.5% 和 40.2%。基线阿片类药物使用者报告的术前背痛程度高于无阿片类药物组(7.0 vs 5.7,P = .001),而 NRS 腿部疼痛评分不相上下(4.8 vs 4,P = .159)。同样,在最后一次随访时,阿片组患者的 NRS-B 评分高于非阿片组患者(3.2 vs 2.3,P = .012),但 NRS 腿部疼痛评分没有差异(2.2 vs 2.4,P = .632):在这项研究中,全世界有近三分之一的ASD手术患者在术前和术后都在使用阿片类药物。国际间存在明显差异,亚洲患者的使用率要低得多,这表明存在文化影响。尽管阿片类药物使用者和非使用者都能从手术中获益,但术前阿片类药物的使用与基线背痛明显加重(2年随访时持续存在)以及术后持续阿片类药物需求密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Influence of Screw Length and Bone Quality on Pedicle Screw Anchorage Under Cyclic Fatigue Loading. Propensity Scores for Observational Studies: Putting Real World Data and Experience to Good Use in Spine Research! Reduced Complications and Improved Survival With Postoperative GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use Following Lumbar Arthrodesis. Letter to Editor on "Sarcopenia as a Predictor of Mortality Following Vertebral Compression Fractures Treated With Vertebroplasty" by Hung-Kai Liao et al. Impact of Pre-operative Estrogen Replacement Therapy on Clinical Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1