Implementing Safewards on Children and Young People's Wards: A Process and Outcomes Evaluation.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Issues in Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1080/01612840.2024.2347507
Alan Simpson, Rubbia A Ali, Madeleine Chadwick, Una Foye, Geoff Brennan
{"title":"Implementing Safewards on Children and Young People's Wards: A Process and Outcomes Evaluation.","authors":"Alan Simpson, Rubbia A Ali, Madeleine Chadwick, Una Foye, Geoff Brennan","doi":"10.1080/01612840.2024.2347507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safewards reduces conflict and containment on adult inpatient wards but there is limited research exploring the model in Children and Young People (CYP) mental health services. We investigated whether Safewards can be successfully implemented on twenty CYP wards across England. A process and outcomes evaluation was employed, utilizing the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Sciences (i-PARiHS) framework. Existing knowledge and use of Safewards was recorded via a self-report benchmarking exercise, verified during visits. Implementation of the 10 Safewards components on each ward was recorded using the Safewards Organizational Fidelity measure. Data from 11 surveys and 17 interviews with ward staff and four interviews with project workers were subject to thematic analysis and mapped against the four i-PARiHS constructs. Twelve of the 20 wards implemented at least half of the Safewards interventions in 12 months, with two wards delivering all 10 interventions. Facilitators and barriers are described. Results demonstrated Safewards is acceptable to a range of CYP services. Whilst implementation was hindered by difficulties outlined, wards with capacity were able and willing to implement the interventions. Results support the commissioning of a study to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of Safewards in CYP units.</p>","PeriodicalId":14664,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"563-579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2024.2347507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safewards reduces conflict and containment on adult inpatient wards but there is limited research exploring the model in Children and Young People (CYP) mental health services. We investigated whether Safewards can be successfully implemented on twenty CYP wards across England. A process and outcomes evaluation was employed, utilizing the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Sciences (i-PARiHS) framework. Existing knowledge and use of Safewards was recorded via a self-report benchmarking exercise, verified during visits. Implementation of the 10 Safewards components on each ward was recorded using the Safewards Organizational Fidelity measure. Data from 11 surveys and 17 interviews with ward staff and four interviews with project workers were subject to thematic analysis and mapped against the four i-PARiHS constructs. Twelve of the 20 wards implemented at least half of the Safewards interventions in 12 months, with two wards delivering all 10 interventions. Facilitators and barriers are described. Results demonstrated Safewards is acceptable to a range of CYP services. Whilst implementation was hindered by difficulties outlined, wards with capacity were able and willing to implement the interventions. Results support the commissioning of a study to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of Safewards in CYP units.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿童和青少年病房实施安全措施:过程与结果评估》。
安全病房 "减少了成人住院病房中的冲突和遏制,但在儿童和青少年(CYP)心理健康服务中探索该模式的研究却很有限。我们调查了安全监护是否能在英格兰的 20 个儿童和青少年病房成功实施。我们采用了 "综合促进健康科学研究实施行动"(i-PARiHS)框架,对实施过程和结果进行了评估。通过自我报告基准活动,记录安全标准的现有知识和使用情况,并在访问期间进行核实。使用 "安全卫士组织忠实度 "测量法记录了每个病房的 10 个安全卫士组成部分的实施情况。对 11 份调查问卷、17 次病房工作人员访谈和 4 次项目工作人员访谈所获得的数据进行了专题分析,并根据 i-PARiHS 的四个构架进行了映射。20 个病房中有 12 个在 12 个月内至少实施了一半的安全卫士干预措施,其中两个病房实施了全部 10 项干预措施。对促进因素和障碍进行了描述。结果表明,各种儿童青少年服务机构都能接受安全卫士。虽然实施过程中遇到了一些困难,但有能力的病房能够并愿意实施干预措施。研究结果支持委托开展一项研究,以评估 "安全监护 "在幼儿保育单位的实施情况和成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Issues in Mental Health Nursing NURSINGPSYCHIATRY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Issues in Mental Health Nursing is a refereed journal designed to expand psychiatric and mental health nursing knowledge. It deals with new, innovative approaches to client care, in-depth analysis of current issues, and empirical research. Because clinical research is the primary vehicle for the development of nursing science, the journal presents data-based articles on nursing care provision to clients of all ages in a variety of community and institutional settings. Additionally, the journal publishes theoretical papers and manuscripts addressing mental health promotion, public policy concerns, and educational preparation of mental health nurses. International contributions are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Partnering with Persons Living with Bipolar Disorder to Develop an Authentic Virtual Simulation. Overcoming Loneliness: Is There a Role for Mental Health Nurses? NANDA-I and NOC Linkages for Six Psychosocial Nursing Diagnoses: A Validation Study. Digital Media to Support Healing from Trauma: A Conceptual Framework Based on Mindfulness. Flat Recovery Process in Mental Health: A Qualitative Analysis of Autoethnography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1