Global review of COVID-19 mitigation strategies and their impact on cancer service disruptions

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Cancer Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100486
Richa Shah , Ching Ee Loo , Nader Mounir Hanna , Suzanne Hughes , Allini Mafra , Hanna Fink , Ethna McFerran , Montse Garcia , Suryakanta Acharya , Oliver Langselius , Clara Frick , Jean Niyigaba , Nwamaka Lasebikan , Julia Steinberg , Richard Sullivan , Freddie Bray , André Michel Ilbawi , Ophira Ginsburg , Karen Chiam , Jonathan Cylus , Isabelle Soerjomataram
{"title":"Global review of COVID-19 mitigation strategies and their impact on cancer service disruptions","authors":"Richa Shah ,&nbsp;Ching Ee Loo ,&nbsp;Nader Mounir Hanna ,&nbsp;Suzanne Hughes ,&nbsp;Allini Mafra ,&nbsp;Hanna Fink ,&nbsp;Ethna McFerran ,&nbsp;Montse Garcia ,&nbsp;Suryakanta Acharya ,&nbsp;Oliver Langselius ,&nbsp;Clara Frick ,&nbsp;Jean Niyigaba ,&nbsp;Nwamaka Lasebikan ,&nbsp;Julia Steinberg ,&nbsp;Richard Sullivan ,&nbsp;Freddie Bray ,&nbsp;André Michel Ilbawi ,&nbsp;Ophira Ginsburg ,&nbsp;Karen Chiam ,&nbsp;Jonathan Cylus ,&nbsp;Isabelle Soerjomataram","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, countries adopted mitigation strategies to reduce disruptions to cancer services. We reviewed their implementation across health system functions and their impact on cancer diagnosis and care during the pandemic. A systematic search was performed using terms related to cancer and COVID-19. Included studies reported on individuals with cancer or cancer care services, focusing on strategies/programs aimed to reduce delays and disruptions. Extracted data were grouped into four functions (governance, financing, service delivery, and resource generation) and sub-functions of the health system performance assessment framework. We included 30 studies from 16 countries involving 192,233 patients with cancer. Multiple mitigation approaches were implemented, predominantly affecting sub-functions of service delivery to control COVID-19 infection via the suspension of non-urgent cancer care, modified treatment guidelines, and increased telemedicine use in routine cancer care delivery. Resource generation was mainly ensured through adequate workforce supply. However, less emphasis on monitoring or assessing the effectiveness and financing of these strategies was observed. Seventeen studies suggested improved service uptake after mitigation implementation, yet the resulting impact on cancer diagnosis and care has not been established. This review emphasizes the importance of developing effective mitigation strategies across all health system (sub)functions to minimize cancer care service disruptions during crises. Deficiencies were observed in health service delivery (to ensure equity), governance (to monitor and evaluate the implementation of mitigation strategies), and financing. In the wake of future emergencies, implementation research studies that include pre-prepared protocols will be essential to assess mitigation impact across cancer care services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, countries adopted mitigation strategies to reduce disruptions to cancer services. We reviewed their implementation across health system functions and their impact on cancer diagnosis and care during the pandemic. A systematic search was performed using terms related to cancer and COVID-19. Included studies reported on individuals with cancer or cancer care services, focusing on strategies/programs aimed to reduce delays and disruptions. Extracted data were grouped into four functions (governance, financing, service delivery, and resource generation) and sub-functions of the health system performance assessment framework. We included 30 studies from 16 countries involving 192,233 patients with cancer. Multiple mitigation approaches were implemented, predominantly affecting sub-functions of service delivery to control COVID-19 infection via the suspension of non-urgent cancer care, modified treatment guidelines, and increased telemedicine use in routine cancer care delivery. Resource generation was mainly ensured through adequate workforce supply. However, less emphasis on monitoring or assessing the effectiveness and financing of these strategies was observed. Seventeen studies suggested improved service uptake after mitigation implementation, yet the resulting impact on cancer diagnosis and care has not been established. This review emphasizes the importance of developing effective mitigation strategies across all health system (sub)functions to minimize cancer care service disruptions during crises. Deficiencies were observed in health service delivery (to ensure equity), governance (to monitor and evaluate the implementation of mitigation strategies), and financing. In the wake of future emergencies, implementation research studies that include pre-prepared protocols will be essential to assess mitigation impact across cancer care services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 缓解战略及其对癌症服务中断影响的全球审查。
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,各国采取了缓解策略以减少对癌症服务的干扰。我们回顾了这些策略在卫生系统各职能部门的实施情况及其对大流行期间癌症诊断和治疗的影响。我们使用与癌症和 COVID-19 相关的术语进行了系统性检索。纳入的研究报告涉及癌症患者或癌症护理服务,重点关注旨在减少延误和中断的策略/计划。提取的数据按照医疗系统绩效评估框架的四个功能(治理、融资、服务提供和资源生成)和子功能进行了分组。我们纳入了来自 16 个国家的 30 项研究,涉及 192,233 名癌症患者。通过暂停非紧急癌症治疗、修改治疗指南以及在常规癌症治疗中增加远程医疗的使用,实施了多种缓解方法,主要影响了提供服务的子功能,以控制 COVID-19 感染。主要通过提供充足的劳动力来确保资源的生成。然而,这些研究较少强调对这些战略的效果和资金的监测或评估。17 项研究表明,在实施缓解措施后,服务吸收率有所提高,但由此对癌症诊断和护理产生的影响尚未确定。本综述强调了在所有医疗系统(子)功能中制定有效的缓解战略以尽量减少危机期间癌症护理服务中断的重要性。在提供医疗服务(确保公平)、治理(监测和评估减灾战略的实施情况)和融资方面都存在不足。在未来的紧急情况发生后,包括预先准备的协议在内的实施研究对于评估缓解措施对癌症治疗服务的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Income disparities have a significant impact on thyroid cancer recurrence and survival An assessment of cancer centre level designation and guideline adherent care in those with rectal cancer: A population based retrospective cohort study Spending on anticancer drugs among Medicare beneficiaries: Analyzing predictors of drug expenditures Barriers to identifying and addressing health-related social needs in cancer care: Patient and patient navigator perspectives Analysis of factors associated with use of real-world data in single technology appraisals of cancer drugs by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1