Factors Influencing Vision Health and Eye Care among Older Adults in Northeast Tennessee.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Southern Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001700
Jodi L Southerland, Muhammad Elahi, Shimin Zheng, Kayla Dodson, Priscilla Rogers, Alberta Orr, DiAnna J Rowe, Hamza Jalal, Siamak Yousefi
{"title":"Factors Influencing Vision Health and Eye Care among Older Adults in Northeast Tennessee.","authors":"Jodi L Southerland, Muhammad Elahi, Shimin Zheng, Kayla Dodson, Priscilla Rogers, Alberta Orr, DiAnna J Rowe, Hamza Jalal, Siamak Yousefi","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the factors associated with vision impairment (VI), age-related eye disease (ARED), and frequency of eye examinations among older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study (N = 166) was designed to identify barriers in vision and eye care services among adults 50 years and older in four counties in Appalachian Tennessee. Surveys were administered in March 2023. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors of VI and ARED and the frequency of eye examinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In two out of the three regression models, predictors such as traveling >10 mi to an eye care provider, barriers to eye care, and a lack of exposure to eye health information emerged as significant factors. Individuals who traveled >10 mi to an eye care provider were more than twice as likely than individuals who traveled shorter distances to have VI and not maintain routine eye care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-6.75; AOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.05-7.55, respectively). Reporting barriers to eye care doubled the odds of ARED (AOR 2.33, 95% CI 1.02-5.34) and substantially increased the odds of reporting a 3-year or longer interval since the last eye examination (AOR 7.45, 95% CI 1.85-29.96) compared with having no barriers to eye care. Moreover, limited exposure to eye health information tripled the odds of VI (AOR 3.26, 95% CI 1.15-9.24) and not maintaining routine eye care (AOR 3.07, 95% CI 0.97-9.70) compared with more exposure to eye health information. Other predictors also were uncovered in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study contributes to the scarce literature on risk factors associated with vision health among older adults in Appalachia.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001700","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the factors associated with vision impairment (VI), age-related eye disease (ARED), and frequency of eye examinations among older adults.

Methods: A cross-sectional study (N = 166) was designed to identify barriers in vision and eye care services among adults 50 years and older in four counties in Appalachian Tennessee. Surveys were administered in March 2023. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors of VI and ARED and the frequency of eye examinations.

Results: In two out of the three regression models, predictors such as traveling >10 mi to an eye care provider, barriers to eye care, and a lack of exposure to eye health information emerged as significant factors. Individuals who traveled >10 mi to an eye care provider were more than twice as likely than individuals who traveled shorter distances to have VI and not maintain routine eye care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-6.75; AOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.05-7.55, respectively). Reporting barriers to eye care doubled the odds of ARED (AOR 2.33, 95% CI 1.02-5.34) and substantially increased the odds of reporting a 3-year or longer interval since the last eye examination (AOR 7.45, 95% CI 1.85-29.96) compared with having no barriers to eye care. Moreover, limited exposure to eye health information tripled the odds of VI (AOR 3.26, 95% CI 1.15-9.24) and not maintaining routine eye care (AOR 3.07, 95% CI 0.97-9.70) compared with more exposure to eye health information. Other predictors also were uncovered in the analysis.

Conclusions: This study contributes to the scarce literature on risk factors associated with vision health among older adults in Appalachia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响田纳西州东北部老年人视力健康和眼科护理的因素。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨与老年人视力损伤(VI)、老年性眼病(ARED)和眼科检查频率相关的因素:设计了一项横断面研究(N = 166),以确定田纳西州阿巴拉契亚地区四个县 50 岁及以上成年人在视力和眼保健服务方面的障碍。调查于 2023 年 3 月进行。采用简单和多元逻辑回归分析来确定视力障碍和急性视力丧失的风险因素以及眼科检查的频率:在三个回归模型中的两个模型中,前往眼科医疗机构的旅行距离大于 10 英里、获得眼科护理的障碍和缺乏眼健康信息等预测因素成为重要因素。与距离较短的人相比,距离眼科医疗机构超过 10 英里的人患有六级视力和不坚持常规眼科护理的可能性是距离较长的人的两倍多(调整后的几率比 [AOR] 分别为 2.69,95% 置信区间 [CI] 为 1.08-6.75;AOR 为 2.82,95% 置信区间 [CI] 为 1.05-7.55)。与没有眼科保健障碍的人相比,报告有眼科保健障碍的人患 ARED 的几率增加了一倍(AOR 2.33,95% CI 1.02-5.34),报告距上次眼科检查间隔 3 年或更长时间的几率也大大增加(AOR 7.45,95% CI 1.85-29.96)。此外,与接触眼健康信息较多的人群相比,接触眼健康信息有限的人群报告 VI(AOR 3.26,95% CI 1.15-9.24)和未坚持常规眼保健(AOR 3.07,95% CI 0.97-9.70)的几率是接触眼健康信息较少的人群报告 VI(AOR 3.26,95% CI 1.15-9.24)和未坚持常规眼保健的几率的三倍。分析中还发现了其他预测因素:这项研究为阿巴拉契亚地区老年人视力健康相关风险因素的稀缺文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Qualitative Study of Transportation-Related Barriers to HIV Care in South Carolina. Association of Socioeconomic Variables with Primary Cesarean Section. Exploring Bias in Health Care: Using Art to Facilitate a Narrative Medicine Approach among Third-Year Medical Students. Fit Testing Failure of Reprocessed "Duckbill"-Type N95 Masks. Improving Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Control with a Dedicated Patient Navigator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1