"It's like crystal gazing": The Lived Experience of Anticipating End-of-Life Choices in Older Adults and Their Close Ones.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnae061
Marte Fleur Antonides, Els van Wijngaarden
{"title":"\"It's like crystal gazing\": The Lived Experience of Anticipating End-of-Life Choices in Older Adults and Their Close Ones.","authors":"Marte Fleur Antonides, Els van Wijngaarden","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Nowadays people increasingly try to take control over the end of their lives by anticipating end-of-life choices. Explication of these choices is encouraged using advance care planning (ACP). We aim to deepen our understanding of how choice-making processes are lived in real life, exploring the experience of community-dwelling older adults and their close ones over time.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A multiperspective and longitudinal approach grounded in phenomenology was chosen. Ten triads consisting of an older adult (75+) and 2 close ones (n = 30) were interviewed, twice individually and once as a group, over 20 months (=70 interviews). Data were thematically analyzed both longitudinally and from all 3 perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The essential meaning of anticipatory choice-making processes was described as a dynamic and relationally entangled decisional process, to navigate between paradoxical choices for an opaque future. Three fields of tension were created due to ambivalence in these choice-making processes: navigation between having and losing control, between taking away and burdening with responsibility, and between expressing and holding back oneself.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Anticipation of choices for hypothetical end-of-life scenarios turned out to be complex and ambivalent. Most older adults resisted ambivalence and ignored complexity in an attempt to stay in control over their end of life. The burdening impact of choices on close ones illuminated the relationality of choice-making processes. These aspects of end-of-life choice-making processes should be integrated into ACP in order to better understand and care for people and their close ones faced with these choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11192859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Nowadays people increasingly try to take control over the end of their lives by anticipating end-of-life choices. Explication of these choices is encouraged using advance care planning (ACP). We aim to deepen our understanding of how choice-making processes are lived in real life, exploring the experience of community-dwelling older adults and their close ones over time.

Research design and methods: A multiperspective and longitudinal approach grounded in phenomenology was chosen. Ten triads consisting of an older adult (75+) and 2 close ones (n = 30) were interviewed, twice individually and once as a group, over 20 months (=70 interviews). Data were thematically analyzed both longitudinally and from all 3 perspectives.

Results: The essential meaning of anticipatory choice-making processes was described as a dynamic and relationally entangled decisional process, to navigate between paradoxical choices for an opaque future. Three fields of tension were created due to ambivalence in these choice-making processes: navigation between having and losing control, between taking away and burdening with responsibility, and between expressing and holding back oneself.

Discussion and implications: Anticipation of choices for hypothetical end-of-life scenarios turned out to be complex and ambivalent. Most older adults resisted ambivalence and ignored complexity in an attempt to stay in control over their end of life. The burdening impact of choices on close ones illuminated the relationality of choice-making processes. These aspects of end-of-life choice-making processes should be integrated into ACP in order to better understand and care for people and their close ones faced with these choices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
就像凝视水晶一样":老年人及其亲友预测临终选择的生活体验。
背景和目的:如今,人们越来越多地通过预测生命末期的选择来控制自己的生命。预先护理规划(ACP)鼓励人们对这些选择进行阐述。我们的目标是加深对现实生活中如何进行选择的理解,探索居住在社区的老年人及其近亲在不同时期的经历:我们选择了一种以现象学为基础的多视角纵向研究方法。在 20 个月的时间里(=70 次访谈),对由一位老年人(75 岁以上)和两位亲近者(人数=30)组成的 10 个三人小组进行了两次单独访谈和一次小组访谈。从纵向和三个角度对数据进行了主题分析:结果:预测选择过程的基本含义被描述为一个动态的、关系纠缠的决策过程,在矛盾的选择之间为不透明的未来导航。由于在这些选择过程中存在矛盾,因此产生了三个紧张领域:在拥有和失去控制之间、在剥夺和承担责任之间、在表达和保留自我之间进行导航:对假想临终情景的选择预期是复杂和矛盾的。大多数老年人抵制矛盾心理,忽视复杂性,试图继续控制自己的临终。选择对亲近的人造成的负担性影响揭示了选择过程的关系性。生命末期选择过程的这些方面应纳入 ACP,以便更好地理解和照顾面临这些选择的人及其近亲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 Impacts on Physical Activity Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Memory Problems: The Moderating Role of Walkable Neighborhood Destinations. "What Does 'Age-Friendly' Mean to You?": The Role of Microaggressions in a Retirement and Assisted Living Community. Caregiving Challenges from Persistent Pain Among Family Caregivers to People with Dementia. Usability Testing of the PACE-App to Support Family Caregivers in Managing Pain for People with Dementia. The Evolution in Dementia Caregiving Research: NIA's Catalyst Role.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1