Nomophobia and Phubbing Levels of Nursing Students: A Multicenter Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001154
Gul Sahin Karaduman, Tulay Basak, Maria Margarida Santana Fialho Sim-Sim, Vicki Aaberg, Maria José Bule
{"title":"Nomophobia and Phubbing Levels of Nursing Students: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Gul Sahin Karaduman, Tulay Basak, Maria Margarida Santana Fialho Sim-Sim, Vicki Aaberg, Maria José Bule","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Today, with the enhancement in the usage of smartphones, the concepts of nomophobia and phubbing have emerged. Nomophobia refers to the fear of being deprived of smartphones/smart devices. Phubbing is the use of a person's smartphone in situations that are not appropriate for the situation, time, and place. Therefore, the study purposed to evaluate nursing students' nomophobia and phubbing scores in Turkey, Portugal, and the United States. The data were collected with the Personal Information Questionnaire, Nomophobia Scale, and Phubbing Scale from N = 446 nursing students. The mean age of the students was 22.04 ± 4.08 years, and 86.5% were women. It was found that the total nomophobia scores of the nursing students were 80.15 ± 21.96, 72.29 ± 28.09, and 99.65 ± 6.11, respectively in Turkey, Portugal, and the United States. When the countries' Nomophobia Scale total scores, \"giving up convenience,\" \"not being able to communicate,\" and \"losing connectedness\" scores were compared with each other, they were found to be statistically significant ( P < .05). When the countries' Phubbing Scale total scores and all subscale scores were compared with each other were found to be statistically significant ( P < .05). It is seen that nomophobia scores were moderate (60 ≤ NMP-Q nomophobia ≤ 99) and phubbing scores (<40) were below the level indicating addiction in all countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":50694,"journal":{"name":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, with the enhancement in the usage of smartphones, the concepts of nomophobia and phubbing have emerged. Nomophobia refers to the fear of being deprived of smartphones/smart devices. Phubbing is the use of a person's smartphone in situations that are not appropriate for the situation, time, and place. Therefore, the study purposed to evaluate nursing students' nomophobia and phubbing scores in Turkey, Portugal, and the United States. The data were collected with the Personal Information Questionnaire, Nomophobia Scale, and Phubbing Scale from N = 446 nursing students. The mean age of the students was 22.04 ± 4.08 years, and 86.5% were women. It was found that the total nomophobia scores of the nursing students were 80.15 ± 21.96, 72.29 ± 28.09, and 99.65 ± 6.11, respectively in Turkey, Portugal, and the United States. When the countries' Nomophobia Scale total scores, "giving up convenience," "not being able to communicate," and "losing connectedness" scores were compared with each other, they were found to be statistically significant ( P < .05). When the countries' Phubbing Scale total scores and all subscale scores were compared with each other were found to be statistically significant ( P < .05). It is seen that nomophobia scores were moderate (60 ≤ NMP-Q nomophobia ≤ 99) and phubbing scores (<40) were below the level indicating addiction in all countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业学生的恋母情结和幻觉水平:一项多中心研究。
如今,随着智能手机使用率的提高,出现了 "Nomophobia "和 "phubbing "的概念。恐名症指的是对被剥夺智能手机/智能设备的恐惧。而 "窥屏 "则是指在不适合的情况、时间和地点下使用智能手机。因此,本研究旨在评估土耳其、葡萄牙和美国护理专业学生的Nomophobia和Phubbing得分。研究使用个人信息调查表、恋母情结量表和嗜睡量表收集了 446 名护理专业学生的数据。学生的平均年龄为 22.04±4.08 岁,86.5% 为女性。研究发现,土耳其、葡萄牙和美国护理专业学生的恐名症总分分别为(80.15 ± 21.96)、(72.29 ± 28.09)和(99.65 ± 6.11)分。将各国的厌学量表总分、"放弃便利"、"无法沟通 "和 "失去联系 "得分进行比较,发现它们之间有统计学意义(P < .05)。将各国的 "幻觉量表 "总分和所有分量表得分进行比较,发现它们之间有统计学意义(P < .05)。可以看出,恐名症得分处于中等水平(60≤NMP-Q 恐名症≤99),而幽闭症得分(60≤NMP-Q 幽闭症≤99)则处于中等水平(60≤NMP-Q 幽闭症≤99)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing 工程技术-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing has been at the interface of the science of information and the art of nursing, publishing articles on the latest developments in nursing informatics, research, education and administrative of health information technology. CIN connects you with colleagues as they share knowledge on implementation of electronic health records systems, design decision-support systems, incorporate evidence-based healthcare in practice, explore point-of-care computing in practice and education, and conceptually integrate nursing languages and standard data sets. Continuing education contact hours are available in every issue.
期刊最新文献
A Question Answering Chatbot for Gastric Cancer Patients After Curative Gastrectomy: Development and Evaluation of User Experience and Performance. Migrating Mobile Applications to the Web: Adult Crash Cart Training. Relationship Between Individual Innovativeness Levels and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Among Nursing and Midwifery Students. The Content, Reliability, and Quality of Insulin Pen Injection Videos on YouTube as Patient Education Resource. Use of Standardized Nursing Terminologies to Capture Social Determinants of Health Data: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1