Development and Validation of a Ready-to-Talk Measure for Use in Adolescents and Young Adults Living With Advanced Cancer.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Cancer Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1097/NCC.0000000000001343
Cynthia J Bell, Jessica L Spruit, Janet A Deatrick, Meaghann S Weaver, David S Dickens, Pamela S Hinds, Karen L Kavanaugh
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Ready-to-Talk Measure for Use in Adolescents and Young Adults Living With Advanced Cancer.","authors":"Cynthia J Bell, Jessica L Spruit, Janet A Deatrick, Meaghann S Weaver, David S Dickens, Pamela S Hinds, Karen L Kavanaugh","doi":"10.1097/NCC.0000000000001343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the era of evolving and emerging therapies, adolescents and young adults (AYAs) living with advanced cancer experience a high degree of uncertainty, making palliative care and end-of-life (PCEOL) discussions difficult. Clinical conversations determine values/preferences that guide shared decision-making and goals of treatment, including end-of-life care when cancer progresses. Initiating PCEOL conversations is challenging for clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study describes the development and validation of an instrument that measures AYA readiness to engage in PCEOL clinical conversations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Ready-to-Talk Measure (R-T-M) was developed, guided by the revised conceptual model of readiness across 3 domains (awareness, acceptance, and willingness). Content experts evaluated validity, and 13 AYAs with advanced cancer participated in cognitive interviews. Acceptability (item applicability, clarity, interpretation, sensitivity, missingness) and experiences (benefit, burden) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale content validity index was ≥0.90 for each domain. Forty-two of the 55 R-T-M items were acceptable without any change. Three items were deleted. Ten items were modified, and 3 were added. Adolescents and young adults wanted more items about friends/siblings and about AYA unique qualities for clinicians to know them better. Adolescents and young adults acknowledged benefit through talking about difficult, relevant topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ready-to-Talk Measure validity was strengthened by deleting or modifying unclear or misinterpreted items and by adding items. Next steps include psychometric analysis to determine reliability/dimensionality and stakeholder input to make the R-T-M a clinically useful tool.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Ready-to-Talk Measure assessment of readiness to engage in PCEOL conversations while identifying unique preferences of AYAs holds promise for facilitating ongoing discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50713,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the era of evolving and emerging therapies, adolescents and young adults (AYAs) living with advanced cancer experience a high degree of uncertainty, making palliative care and end-of-life (PCEOL) discussions difficult. Clinical conversations determine values/preferences that guide shared decision-making and goals of treatment, including end-of-life care when cancer progresses. Initiating PCEOL conversations is challenging for clinicians.

Objective: This study describes the development and validation of an instrument that measures AYA readiness to engage in PCEOL clinical conversations.

Methods: A Ready-to-Talk Measure (R-T-M) was developed, guided by the revised conceptual model of readiness across 3 domains (awareness, acceptance, and willingness). Content experts evaluated validity, and 13 AYAs with advanced cancer participated in cognitive interviews. Acceptability (item applicability, clarity, interpretation, sensitivity, missingness) and experiences (benefit, burden) were analyzed.

Results: The scale content validity index was ≥0.90 for each domain. Forty-two of the 55 R-T-M items were acceptable without any change. Three items were deleted. Ten items were modified, and 3 were added. Adolescents and young adults wanted more items about friends/siblings and about AYA unique qualities for clinicians to know them better. Adolescents and young adults acknowledged benefit through talking about difficult, relevant topics.

Conclusion: Ready-to-Talk Measure validity was strengthened by deleting or modifying unclear or misinterpreted items and by adding items. Next steps include psychometric analysis to determine reliability/dimensionality and stakeholder input to make the R-T-M a clinically useful tool.

Implications for practice: Ready-to-Talk Measure assessment of readiness to engage in PCEOL conversations while identifying unique preferences of AYAs holds promise for facilitating ongoing discussions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发并验证用于晚期癌症青少年患者的 "准备说话 "测量方法。
背景:在新疗法不断发展的时代,身患晚期癌症的青少年和年轻成人(AYAs)经历着高度的不确定性,使得姑息治疗和生命终结(PCEOL)的讨论变得困难重重。临床对话可确定价值观/偏好,从而指导共同决策和治疗目标,包括癌症进展时的临终关怀。启动 PCEOL 对话对临床医生来说具有挑战性:本研究介绍了一种工具的开发和验证情况,该工具可用于测量青壮年参与 PCEOL 临床对话的准备程度:方法:在修订后的跨 3 个领域(意识、接受和意愿)的准备度概念模型的指导下,开发了一种 "准备谈话测量"(Ready-to-Talk Measure,R-T-M)工具。内容专家对其有效性进行了评估,13 名晚期癌症患者参加了认知访谈。对可接受性(项目适用性、清晰度、解释、敏感性、遗漏)和体验(益处、负担)进行了分析:每个领域的量表内容效度指数均≥0.90。55 个 R-T-M 项目中有 42 个无需修改即可接受。删除了 3 个项目。修改了 10 个项目,增加了 3 个项目。青少年希望有更多关于朋友/兄弟姐妹以及关于青壮年独特品质的项目,以便临床医生更好地了解他们。青少年和青壮年承认通过谈论困难、相关的话题而受益匪浅:通过删除或修改不明确或被误解的项目以及增加项目,"准备谈话 "量表的有效性得到了加强。下一步工作包括进行心理计量分析,以确定可靠性/维度,并听取利益相关者的意见,使 R-T-M 成为临床上有用的工具:准备就绪--谈话测量 "评估参与 PCEOL 谈话的准备情况,同时确定亚裔美国人的独特偏好,有望促进正在进行的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Nursing
Cancer Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
244
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each bimonthly issue of Cancer Nursing™ addresses the whole spectrum of problems arising in the care and support of cancer patients--prevention and early detection, geriatric and pediatric cancer nursing, medical and surgical oncology, ambulatory care, nutritional support, psychosocial aspects of cancer, patient responses to all treatment modalities, and specific nursing interventions. The journal offers unparalleled coverage of cancer care delivery practices worldwide, as well as groundbreaking research findings and their practical applications.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Interventions Targeting Cancer-Related Financial Hardship: Current Evidence and Implications. At-Home Care Versus Total Hospital Care Model for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Lymphoma Patients: A Pilot Case-Control Study. The Effects of Laughter Therapy on Perceived Stress and Quality of Life in Women With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy: A Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Nurse-Led Interventions in Managing Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Systematic Review. The Impact of Frailty on the Toxic Reaction of Chemotherapy in Patients With Cervical Cancer: A Longitudinal Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1