PrEP facilitators and barriers in substance use bridge clinics for women who engage in sex work and who use drugs.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1186/s13722-024-00476-4
Miriam Th Harris, Emma Weinberger, Christine O'Brien, Mary Althoff, Samantha Paltrow-Krulwich, Jessica L Taylor, Abigail Judge, Jeffrey H Samet, Alexander Y Walley, Christine M Gunn
{"title":"PrEP facilitators and barriers in substance use bridge clinics for women who engage in sex work and who use drugs.","authors":"Miriam Th Harris, Emma Weinberger, Christine O'Brien, Mary Althoff, Samantha Paltrow-Krulwich, Jessica L Taylor, Abigail Judge, Jeffrey H Samet, Alexander Y Walley, Christine M Gunn","doi":"10.1186/s13722-024-00476-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women who engage in sex work and use drugs (WSWUD) experience disproportionate HIV risks. Substance use treatment bridge clinics offer an opportunity to increase HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery to WSWUD, but research on best practices is lacking. Therefore, we explored facilitators and barriers to PrEP across the PrEP care continuum in these settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bridge clinic and affiliated harm reduction health service providers and WSWUD from Boston were recruited using passive and active outreach between December 2021 and August 2022. Participants were invited to take part in semi-structured phone or in-person interviews to explore HIV prevention and PrEP care experiences overall and within bridge clinic settings. Deductive codes were developed based on HIV risk environment frameworks and the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model and inductive codes were added based on transcript review. Grounded content analysis was used to generate themes organized around the PrEP care continuum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 14 providers and 25 WSWUD. Most WSWUD were aware of PrEP and more than half had initiated PrEP at some point. However, most who initiated PrEP did not report success with daily oral adherence. Providers and WSWUD described facilitators and barriers to PrEP across the steps of the care continuum: Awareness, uptake, adherence, and retention. Facilitators for WSWUD included non-stigmatizing communication with providers, rapid wraparound substance use treatment and HIV services, having a PrEP routine, and service structures to support PrEP adherence. Barriers included low HIV risk perceptions and competing drug use and survival priorities. Provider facilitators included clinical note templates prompting HIV risk assessments and training. Barriers included discomfort discussing sex work risks, competing clinical priorities, and a lack of PrEP adherence infrastructure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WSWUD and bridge clinic providers favored integrated HIV prevention and substance use services in harm reduction and bridge clinic settings. Harm reduction and bridge clinic programs played a key role in HIV prevention and PrEP education for WSWUD. Effective behavioral and structural interventions are still needed to improve PrEP adherence for WSWUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11145858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00476-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women who engage in sex work and use drugs (WSWUD) experience disproportionate HIV risks. Substance use treatment bridge clinics offer an opportunity to increase HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery to WSWUD, but research on best practices is lacking. Therefore, we explored facilitators and barriers to PrEP across the PrEP care continuum in these settings.

Methods: Bridge clinic and affiliated harm reduction health service providers and WSWUD from Boston were recruited using passive and active outreach between December 2021 and August 2022. Participants were invited to take part in semi-structured phone or in-person interviews to explore HIV prevention and PrEP care experiences overall and within bridge clinic settings. Deductive codes were developed based on HIV risk environment frameworks and the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model and inductive codes were added based on transcript review. Grounded content analysis was used to generate themes organized around the PrEP care continuum.

Results: The sample included 14 providers and 25 WSWUD. Most WSWUD were aware of PrEP and more than half had initiated PrEP at some point. However, most who initiated PrEP did not report success with daily oral adherence. Providers and WSWUD described facilitators and barriers to PrEP across the steps of the care continuum: Awareness, uptake, adherence, and retention. Facilitators for WSWUD included non-stigmatizing communication with providers, rapid wraparound substance use treatment and HIV services, having a PrEP routine, and service structures to support PrEP adherence. Barriers included low HIV risk perceptions and competing drug use and survival priorities. Provider facilitators included clinical note templates prompting HIV risk assessments and training. Barriers included discomfort discussing sex work risks, competing clinical priorities, and a lack of PrEP adherence infrastructure.

Conclusion: WSWUD and bridge clinic providers favored integrated HIV prevention and substance use services in harm reduction and bridge clinic settings. Harm reduction and bridge clinic programs played a key role in HIV prevention and PrEP education for WSWUD. Effective behavioral and structural interventions are still needed to improve PrEP adherence for WSWUD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为从事性工作并使用毒品的妇女开设的药物使用桥接诊所中的 PrEP 促进因素和障碍。
背景:从事性工作并使用毒品(WSWUD)的女性面临着过高的 HIV 风险。药物使用治疗桥接诊所为增加向从事性工作并使用毒品的女性提供艾滋病暴露前预防(PrEP)服务提供了机会,但缺乏有关最佳实践的研究。因此,我们探讨了在这些环境中,PrEP 在整个 PrEP 治疗过程中的促进因素和障碍:在 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 8 月期间,我们通过被动和主动外联的方式招募了波士顿的桥梁诊所和附属减低伤害医疗服务提供者以及 WSWUD。我们邀请参与者参加半结构化的电话或面对面访谈,以探讨 HIV 预防和 PrEP 护理的总体经验以及在桥梁诊所环境中的经验。根据 HIV 风险环境框架和 "信息-动机-行为技能 "模型制定了演绎代码,并根据记录审查添加了归纳代码。通过基础内容分析,围绕 PrEP 护理的连续性产生了主题:样本包括 14 名医疗服务提供者和 25 名妇女和自闭症儿童。大多数 WSWUD 了解 PrEP,半数以上的 WSWUD 曾在某个阶段启动过 PrEP。然而,大多数开始使用 PrEP 的人并没有成功地坚持每天口服。医疗服务提供者和 WSWUD 介绍了 PrEP 在整个治疗过程中的促进因素和障碍:了解、接受、坚持和保留。对 WSWUD 来说,促进因素包括与医疗服务提供者进行非污名化的沟通、快速的药物使用治疗和 HIV 服务、PrEP 常规以及支持坚持 PrEP 的服务结构。阻碍因素包括对艾滋病风险的低认知,以及药物使用和生存优先事项之间的竞争。提供者促进因素包括临床笔记模板提示 HIV 风险评估和培训。障碍包括不习惯讨论性工作风险、相互竞争的临床优先事项以及缺乏坚持 PrEP 的基础设施:WSWUD和桥式诊所的提供者赞成在减低伤害和桥式诊所环境中提供综合的艾滋病预防和药物使用服务。减低伤害和过渡诊所项目在 WSWUD 的 HIV 预防和 PrEP 教育中发挥了关键作用。仍需采取有效的行为和结构性干预措施,以提高 WSWUD 对 PrEP 的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
期刊最新文献
Addiction consult service involvement in PrEP and PEP delivery for patients who inject drugs admitted to an urban essential hospital. Expanding access to addictions care: Implementation of a 24-hour healthcare provider support line in British Columbia, Canada. The effects of neighborhood perceptions on response to a technology-assisted parenting intervention for adolescent substance use: protocol of a diversity supplement to parent SMART (Substance Misuse in Adolescents in Residential Treatment). Are the self-stigma and perceived stigma of patients treated with methadone or buprenorphine still a problem fifty years after the marketing authorization for opioid agonist treatment? The observational STIGMA study. Acceptability of "DIDE", a mobile application designed at facilitating care adherence of patients with substance use disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1