Prostate health index density aids the diagnosis of prostate cancer detected using magnetic resonance imaging targeted prostate biopsy in Taiwanese multicenter study.

Ching-Hsin Chang, Ping-Hsuan Yu, Po-Fan Hsieh, Jian-Hua Hong, Chih-Hung Chiang, Hao-Min Cheng, Hsi-Chin Wu, Chao-Yuan Huang, Tzu-Ping Lin
{"title":"Prostate health index density aids the diagnosis of prostate cancer detected using magnetic resonance imaging targeted prostate biopsy in Taiwanese multicenter study.","authors":"Ching-Hsin Chang, Ping-Hsuan Yu, Po-Fan Hsieh, Jian-Hua Hong, Chih-Hung Chiang, Hao-Min Cheng, Hsi-Chin Wu, Chao-Yuan Huang, Tzu-Ping Lin","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) followed by MRI-targeted prostate biopsy is the current standard for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). However, studies evaluating the value of biomarkers, including prostate health index (PHI) and its derivatives using this method are limited. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of PHI density (PHID) in guiding MRI-targeted prostate biopsies to identify clinically significant PCas (csPCa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The multicenter prospectively registered prostate biopsy database from three medical centers in Taiwan included patients with PHI and MRI-targeted and/or systematic prostate biopsies. We assessed the required values of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, PHI, PHID, and Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) score using multivariable analyses, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and decision curve analyses (DCA). csPCa was defined as the International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason group ≥2 PCa, with an emphasis on reducing unwarranted biopsies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort comprised 420 individuals. Diagnoses of PCa and csPCa were confirmed in 62.4% and 47.9% of the participants, respectively. The csPCa diagnosis rates were increased with increasing PI-RADS scores (20.5%, 44.2%, and 73.1% for scores 3, 4, and 5, respectively). Independent predictors for csPCa detection included PHI, prostate volume, and PI-RADS scores of 4 and 5 in multivariable analyses. The area under the curve (AUC) for csPCa of PHID (0.815) or PHI (0.788) was superior to that of PSA density (0.746) and PSA (0.635) in the entire cohort, and the superiority of PHID (0.758) was observed in PI-RADS 3 lesions. DCA revealed that PHID achieved the best net clinical benefit in PI-RADS 3-5 and 4/5 cases. Among PI-RADS 3 lesions, cutoff values of PHID 0.70 and 0.43 could eliminate 51.8% and 30.4% of omitted biopsies, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PHI-derived biomarkers, including PHID, performed better than other PSA-derived biomarkers in diagnosing PCa in MRI-detected lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":"678-685"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) followed by MRI-targeted prostate biopsy is the current standard for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). However, studies evaluating the value of biomarkers, including prostate health index (PHI) and its derivatives using this method are limited. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of PHI density (PHID) in guiding MRI-targeted prostate biopsies to identify clinically significant PCas (csPCa).

Methods: The multicenter prospectively registered prostate biopsy database from three medical centers in Taiwan included patients with PHI and MRI-targeted and/or systematic prostate biopsies. We assessed the required values of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, PHI, PHID, and Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) score using multivariable analyses, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and decision curve analyses (DCA). csPCa was defined as the International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason group ≥2 PCa, with an emphasis on reducing unwarranted biopsies.

Results: The study cohort comprised 420 individuals. Diagnoses of PCa and csPCa were confirmed in 62.4% and 47.9% of the participants, respectively. The csPCa diagnosis rates were increased with increasing PI-RADS scores (20.5%, 44.2%, and 73.1% for scores 3, 4, and 5, respectively). Independent predictors for csPCa detection included PHI, prostate volume, and PI-RADS scores of 4 and 5 in multivariable analyses. The area under the curve (AUC) for csPCa of PHID (0.815) or PHI (0.788) was superior to that of PSA density (0.746) and PSA (0.635) in the entire cohort, and the superiority of PHID (0.758) was observed in PI-RADS 3 lesions. DCA revealed that PHID achieved the best net clinical benefit in PI-RADS 3-5 and 4/5 cases. Among PI-RADS 3 lesions, cutoff values of PHID 0.70 and 0.43 could eliminate 51.8% and 30.4% of omitted biopsies, respectively.

Conclusion: PHI-derived biomarkers, including PHID, performed better than other PSA-derived biomarkers in diagnosing PCa in MRI-detected lesions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
台湾多中心研究发现,前列腺健康指数密度有助于通过磁共振成像前列腺活检诊断前列腺癌。
背景:多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)后进行磁共振靶向前列腺活检是目前诊断前列腺癌(PCa)的标准。然而,使用这种方法评估包括前列腺健康指数(PHI)及其衍生物在内的生物标志物价值的研究还很有限。我们的目的是研究 PHI 密度(PHID)在指导 MRI 靶向前列腺活检以识别有临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa)方面的功效:方法:台湾三家医疗中心的多中心前列腺活检前瞻性登记数据库纳入了PHI和MRI靶向和/或系统性前列腺活检的患者。我们使用多变量分析、接收器操作特征曲线分析和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估了前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、前列腺体积、PHI、PHID 和前列腺成像报告与数据系统(PI-RADS)评分的必要值。csPCa 被定义为国际泌尿病理学会格雷欣组≥2 PCa,重点是减少不必要的活检:研究队列由 420 人组成。分别有 62.4% 和 47.9% 的参与者确诊为 PCa 和 csPCa。随着 PI-RADS 评分的增加,csPCa 诊断率也随之增加(评分 3、4 和 5 分别为 20.5%、44.2% 和 73.1%)。在多变量分析中,csPCa 检测的独立预测因素包括 PHI、前列腺体积以及 PI-RADS 评分 4 分和 5 分。在整个队列中,PHID(0.815)或 PHI(0.788)的 csPCa 曲线下面积(AUC)优于 PSA 密度(0.746)和 PSA(0.635),PHID(0.758)在 PI-RADS 3 级病变中更具优势。DCA显示,PHID在PI-RADS 3-5和4/5病例中取得了最佳净临床获益。在PI-RADS 3病变中,PHID 0.70和0.43的临界值可分别消除51.8%和30.4%的遗漏活检:包括 PHID 在内的 PHI 衍生生物标志物在诊断 MRI 检测到的病变中的 PCa 方面优于其他 PSA 衍生生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Onyx as an adjunctive embolic material for transvenous embolization of cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula after coiling. Postoperative rhinosinusitis and microbiological outcomes following endoscopic endonasal approaches: A retrospective analysis of 300 patients. Real-world outcomes of everolimus-based treatment in a Taiwanese cohort with metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer. A prediction model of echocardiographic variables to screen for potentially correctable shunts in adult ASD-PAH patients. Risk factors for screw loosening in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with Dynesys dynamic stabilization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1