Evolution of Tracheobronchial Colonization Following Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Neurologic Injury Who Are Ventilated

Estelle Danche MD , Sylvain Meyer PharmD , Elie Guichard MSc , Ana Catalina Hernandez Padilla MD, PhD , Anne-Laure Fedou MD , Philippe Vignon MD, PhD , Olivier Barraud PharmD, PhD , Bruno François MD
{"title":"Evolution of Tracheobronchial Colonization Following Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Neurologic Injury Who Are Ventilated","authors":"Estelle Danche MD ,&nbsp;Sylvain Meyer PharmD ,&nbsp;Elie Guichard MSc ,&nbsp;Ana Catalina Hernandez Padilla MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Anne-Laure Fedou MD ,&nbsp;Philippe Vignon MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Olivier Barraud PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bruno François MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The characteristics and course of endotracheal secretions have scarcely been studied in patients under mechanical ventilation (MV) at risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Can endotracheal secretions be exhaustively described and what is their predictive value for the diagnosis of VAP during MV?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>This single-center prospective study included neuro-injured patients with neurologic injury requiring MV for at least 7 days. Patients with pulmonary and infectious diseases were ineligible. All endotracheal aspirates (ETAs) collected between tracheal intubation and day 7 were analyzed. Macroscopic characteristics and microbiology were assessed. Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score was calculated daily. An anonymized adjudication committee validated all VAP events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-eight patients and 1,544 ETAs were analyzed. Overall, 81% of the ETAs were purulent, and 50% were thick. Culture results showed high interindividual and intraindividual variability. Ten patients (21%) developed early-onset VAP. Eight patients (80%) with VAP and 14 (37%) without VAP had a Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score &gt; 6. The day prior to VAP diagnosis, a 20 mL increase in ETA volume detected VAP with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 93%.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>This study provides new information regarding the course of respiratory colonization in patients who are mechanically ventilated and suggests that ETA color/aspects and pathogen kinetics cannot predict VAP. Traditional VAP criteria (Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score and bacterial load) also had a low diagnostic specificity. Conversely, an increase in secretion volume should alert for VAP development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000297/pdfft?md5=f8a9d2a3710d2e4c53d03e8fb17494de&pid=1-s2.0-S2949788424000297-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The characteristics and course of endotracheal secretions have scarcely been studied in patients under mechanical ventilation (MV) at risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Research Question

Can endotracheal secretions be exhaustively described and what is their predictive value for the diagnosis of VAP during MV?

Study Design and Methods

This single-center prospective study included neuro-injured patients with neurologic injury requiring MV for at least 7 days. Patients with pulmonary and infectious diseases were ineligible. All endotracheal aspirates (ETAs) collected between tracheal intubation and day 7 were analyzed. Macroscopic characteristics and microbiology were assessed. Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score was calculated daily. An anonymized adjudication committee validated all VAP events.

Results

Forty-eight patients and 1,544 ETAs were analyzed. Overall, 81% of the ETAs were purulent, and 50% were thick. Culture results showed high interindividual and intraindividual variability. Ten patients (21%) developed early-onset VAP. Eight patients (80%) with VAP and 14 (37%) without VAP had a Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score > 6. The day prior to VAP diagnosis, a 20 mL increase in ETA volume detected VAP with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 93%.

Interpretation

This study provides new information regarding the course of respiratory colonization in patients who are mechanically ventilated and suggests that ETA color/aspects and pathogen kinetics cannot predict VAP. Traditional VAP criteria (Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score and bacterial load) also had a low diagnostic specificity. Conversely, an increase in secretion volume should alert for VAP development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通气的神经损伤患者气管插管后气管支气管菌落的演变
研究背景对于有可能患呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)的机械通气(MV)患者,气管内分泌物的特征和过程很少有人研究。研究问题能否详尽描述气管内分泌物,它们对 MV 期间 VAP 诊断的预测价值如何?患有肺部疾病和感染性疾病的患者不符合条件。分析了从气管插管到第 7 天期间收集的所有气管内吸痰液 (ETA)。对宏观特征和微生物学进行了评估。每天计算临床肺部感染评分。一个匿名评审委员会对所有 VAP 事件进行了验证。总体而言,81% 的 ETA 为化脓性,50% 为粘稠性。培养结果显示个体间和个体内差异很大。十名患者(21%)出现了早发性 VAP。在确诊 VAP 的前一天,ETA 量增加 20 毫升可检测出 VAP,灵敏度为 67%,特异度为 93%。这项研究提供了有关机械通气患者呼吸道定植过程的新信息,并表明 ETA 颜色/外观和病原体动力学不能预测 VAP。传统的 VAP 标准(临床肺部感染评分和细菌量)的诊断特异性也很低。相反,分泌量增加应警惕 VAP 的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sugar Rush Mind the Gap Move Away From Arbitrariness Variation in Triage to Pediatric vs Adult ICUs Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Asthma Exacerbations Vasopressors Administration Through Midline Catheters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1