Public attitudes towards surveillance and privacy of personal communications in 34 African countries

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Telematics and Informatics Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2024.102147
Adewunmi O Adeyeye
{"title":"Public attitudes towards surveillance and privacy of personal communications in 34 African countries","authors":"Adewunmi O Adeyeye","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2024.102147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines public attitudes regarding the privacy of personal communications across several African countries. The study additionally investigates factors influencing an individual’s expression of the right to privacy and rejection of state surveillance. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were conducted on survey data gathered from 48,084 interviews completed in 34 countries. The findings reveal that, among the surveyed countries (34 out of 54 on the continent), a majority (54.87%) advocate for the protection of private communications. This indicates an increasing inclination among individuals to assert greater control over their personal information, which is being collected and utilized by governmental organizations and often by extension, private entities. The results demonstrate that education, gender, occupation, institutional trust, frequency of newspaper reading, perceptions of social media, attitudes towards internet regulation, opinions on government accountability, and the frequency of internet usage all significantly influence an individual’s stance on personal data privacy. Governments must strive for more effective communication with citizens to foster support for surveillance programs that achieve a delicate equilibrium between state security and the protection of privacy rights. This study provides an evidence base that policymakers, practitioners and academics can utilize to make informed decisions about data privacy attitudes and predict privacy actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 102147"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585324000510","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines public attitudes regarding the privacy of personal communications across several African countries. The study additionally investigates factors influencing an individual’s expression of the right to privacy and rejection of state surveillance. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were conducted on survey data gathered from 48,084 interviews completed in 34 countries. The findings reveal that, among the surveyed countries (34 out of 54 on the continent), a majority (54.87%) advocate for the protection of private communications. This indicates an increasing inclination among individuals to assert greater control over their personal information, which is being collected and utilized by governmental organizations and often by extension, private entities. The results demonstrate that education, gender, occupation, institutional trust, frequency of newspaper reading, perceptions of social media, attitudes towards internet regulation, opinions on government accountability, and the frequency of internet usage all significantly influence an individual’s stance on personal data privacy. Governments must strive for more effective communication with citizens to foster support for surveillance programs that achieve a delicate equilibrium between state security and the protection of privacy rights. This study provides an evidence base that policymakers, practitioners and academics can utilize to make informed decisions about data privacy attitudes and predict privacy actions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
34 个非洲国家公众对个人通信监控和隐私的态度
本文探讨了几个非洲国家公众对个人通信隐私的态度。研究还调查了影响个人表达隐私权和拒绝国家监控的因素。我们对在 34 个国家完成的 48,084 次访谈中收集到的调查数据进行了描述性分析和逻辑回归分析。结果显示,在接受调查的国家中(非洲大陆 54 个国家中的 34 个),大多数国家(54.87%)主张保护私人通信。这表明,个人越来越倾向于对自己的个人信息进行更大程度的控制,因为这些信息正被政府组织收集和利用,而且往往会延伸到私人实体。研究结果表明,教育程度、性别、职业、对机构的信任、阅读报纸的频率、对社交媒体的看法、对互联网监管的态度、对政府问责制的看法以及使用互联网的频率都会对个人对个人数据隐私的立场产生重大影响。政府必须努力与公民进行更有效的沟通,以促进对监控项目的支持,从而在国家安全和隐私权保护之间实现微妙的平衡。本研究提供了一个证据库,政策制定者、从业人员和学者可利用该证据库就数据隐私态度做出明智决策,并预测隐私行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
期刊最新文献
Towards harmonization of EU and UN methodologies for the assessment of eGovernment The silence of the LLMs: Cross-lingual analysis of guardrail-related political bias and false information prevalence in ChatGPT, Google Bard (Gemini), and Bing Chat How to fight loneliness: The importance of networked friendship quality and self-esteem differs with age Overcoming social and ethical challenges of AI through organizational resilience. A PLS-SEM approach Understanding online shopping fraud among Chinese elderly: Extending routine activity theory in the online context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1