Bus bunching: a comprehensive review from demand, supply, and decision-making perspectives

IF 9.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Transport Reviews Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1080/01441647.2024.2313969
Mustafa Rezazada , Neema Nassir , Egemen Tanin , Avishai (Avi) Ceder
{"title":"Bus bunching: a comprehensive review from demand, supply, and decision-making perspectives","authors":"Mustafa Rezazada ,&nbsp;Neema Nassir ,&nbsp;Egemen Tanin ,&nbsp;Avishai (Avi) Ceder","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2024.2313969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Public transport service reliability is crucial for all stakeholders, including users, operators, and society. Bus bunching, where two or more buses on the same route travel closely together, significantly undermines service reliability. This paper reviews bus bunching, its causes and consequences, and control strategies from demand, supply, and decision-making perspectives. It identifies gaps in the literature, emphasising the need for realistic evaluations of control methods and real-world applications. The paper reveals that most bunching solutions prioritise operators over public transport users, and the trade-offs posed by these methods require further examinations. Hybrid methods combining holding with other measures have outperformed standalone holding methods but need real-world testing. User-centric approaches, such as encouraging and incentivising passengers to choose less crowded vehicles or wait, have demonstrated some potential in alleviating service bunching. However, their effectiveness in real-world applications present important research directions. In summary, the practical classification and framework presented in this review can assist policymakers in making informed and optimised decisions by considering various variables and performance measures involved in the process, and in finding balanced solutions for passenger and operator.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"44 4","pages":"Pages 766-790"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164724000035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public transport service reliability is crucial for all stakeholders, including users, operators, and society. Bus bunching, where two or more buses on the same route travel closely together, significantly undermines service reliability. This paper reviews bus bunching, its causes and consequences, and control strategies from demand, supply, and decision-making perspectives. It identifies gaps in the literature, emphasising the need for realistic evaluations of control methods and real-world applications. The paper reveals that most bunching solutions prioritise operators over public transport users, and the trade-offs posed by these methods require further examinations. Hybrid methods combining holding with other measures have outperformed standalone holding methods but need real-world testing. User-centric approaches, such as encouraging and incentivising passengers to choose less crowded vehicles or wait, have demonstrated some potential in alleviating service bunching. However, their effectiveness in real-world applications present important research directions. In summary, the practical classification and framework presented in this review can assist policymakers in making informed and optimised decisions by considering various variables and performance measures involved in the process, and in finding balanced solutions for passenger and operator.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公交车扎堆:从需求、供应和决策角度进行全面审查
公共交通服务的可靠性对包括用户、运营商和社会在内的所有利益相关方都至关重要。公交车串车是指同一线路上的两辆或多辆公交车并排行驶,严重影响了服务可靠性。本文从需求、供应和决策的角度回顾了公交车串车、其原因和后果以及控制策略。它指出了文献中的不足,强调了对控制方法和实际应用进行现实评估的必要性。论文揭示了大多数公交车扎堆解决方案都将运营商置于公共交通用户之上,因此需要进一步研究这些方法所带来的权衡问题。将滞留与其他措施相结合的混合方法优于独立的滞留方法,但需要进行实际测试。以用户为中心的方法,如鼓励和激励乘客选择不那么拥挤的车辆或等待,在缓解服务拥挤方面已显示出一定的潜力。然而,这些方法在实际应用中的有效性提出了重要的研究方向。总之,本综述中介绍的实用分类和框架可以帮助政策制定者通过考虑过程中涉及的各种变量和性能指标,做出明智和优化的决策,并为乘客和运营商找到平衡的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Reviews
Transport Reviews TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership. Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.
期刊最新文献
Forecasting travel in urban America: the socio-technical life of an engineering modeling world Spatial factors associated with usage of different on-demand elements within mobility hubs: a systematic literature review Measuring transport-associated urban inequalities: Where are we and where do we go from here? Human factors affecting truck – vulnerable road user safety: a scoping review A survey on reinforcement learning-based control for signalized intersections with connected automated vehicles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1