Influencia de la cirugía laparoscópica dentro de un protocolo de rehabilitación multimodal en cistectomía radical

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Actas urologicas espanolas Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acuro.2023.11.003
L. Muñiz Suárez , J. Subirá Ríos , P. Gayarre Abril , A. Montero Martorán , J.I. Hijazo Conejos , J. García Alarcón , J. García-Magariño Alonso , P. Medrano Llorente , M. Ramírez Fabián , F.X. Elizalde Benito , C. Murillo Pérez , M. Utrilla Ibuarben , A. Asensio Matas , C. Marín Zaldívar , R. Casans Francés , J.M. Ramírez Rodríguez , B. Blasco Beltrán , P. Carrera-Lasfuentes
{"title":"Influencia de la cirugía laparoscópica dentro de un protocolo de rehabilitación multimodal en cistectomía radical","authors":"L. Muñiz Suárez ,&nbsp;J. Subirá Ríos ,&nbsp;P. Gayarre Abril ,&nbsp;A. Montero Martorán ,&nbsp;J.I. Hijazo Conejos ,&nbsp;J. García Alarcón ,&nbsp;J. García-Magariño Alonso ,&nbsp;P. Medrano Llorente ,&nbsp;M. Ramírez Fabián ,&nbsp;F.X. Elizalde Benito ,&nbsp;C. Murillo Pérez ,&nbsp;M. Utrilla Ibuarben ,&nbsp;A. Asensio Matas ,&nbsp;C. Marín Zaldívar ,&nbsp;R. Casans Francés ,&nbsp;J.M. Ramírez Rodríguez ,&nbsp;B. Blasco Beltrán ,&nbsp;P. Carrera-Lasfuentes","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objective</h3><p>The implementation of Enhanced Recover After Surgery (ERAS) multimodal rehabilitation protocols in radical cystectomy has shown to improve outcomes in hospital stay and complications. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic surgery on radical cystectomy within a Multimodal Rehabilitation program.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>The study was carried out in a third level center between 2011 and 2020 including patients with bladder cancer submitted to radical cystectomy according to an ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol and the Spanish Multimodal Rehabilitation Group (GERM) with 20 items to be fulfilled.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 250 radical cystectomies were performed throughout the study period, 42.8% by open surgery (OS) and 57.2% by laparoscopic surgery (LS). The groups are comparable in demographic and clinical variables (<em>P</em>&gt;.05).</p><p>Operative time was longer in the LS group (248.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->55.0 vs. 286.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->51.9<!--> <!-->minutes; <em>P</em>&lt;.001). However, bleeding was significantly lower in the LS group (417.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->365.7 vs. 877.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->529.7 cc; <em>P</em>&lt;.001), as was the need for blood transfusion (33.6% vs. 58.9%; <em>P</em>&lt;.001). Postoperative length of stay (11.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10.5 vs. 20.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->17.2 days; <em>P</em>&lt;.001), total and major complications were also significantly lower in this group (LS). The readmission rate was lower in the LS group but not significantly (36.4% vs. 29.4%; <em>P</em>=.237). The difference between 90-day mortality in both groups was not statistically significant (2.8% LS vs. 4.3% OS; <em>P</em>=.546). The differences were maintained in the multivariate models.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Laparoscopic surgery within a multimodal rehabilitation program increases operative time but significantly decreases intraoperative bleeding, transfusion requirements, postoperative length of stay, and complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 5","pages":"Pages 364-370"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480623001687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objective

The implementation of Enhanced Recover After Surgery (ERAS) multimodal rehabilitation protocols in radical cystectomy has shown to improve outcomes in hospital stay and complications. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic surgery on radical cystectomy within a Multimodal Rehabilitation program.

Material and methods

The study was carried out in a third level center between 2011 and 2020 including patients with bladder cancer submitted to radical cystectomy according to an ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol and the Spanish Multimodal Rehabilitation Group (GERM) with 20 items to be fulfilled.

Results

A total of 250 radical cystectomies were performed throughout the study period, 42.8% by open surgery (OS) and 57.2% by laparoscopic surgery (LS). The groups are comparable in demographic and clinical variables (P>.05).

Operative time was longer in the LS group (248.4 ± 55.0 vs. 286.2 ± 51.9 minutes; P<.001). However, bleeding was significantly lower in the LS group (417.5 ± 365.7 vs. 877.9 ± 529.7 cc; P<.001), as was the need for blood transfusion (33.6% vs. 58.9%; P<.001). Postoperative length of stay (11.5 ± 10.5 vs. 20.1 ± 17.2 days; P<.001), total and major complications were also significantly lower in this group (LS). The readmission rate was lower in the LS group but not significantly (36.4% vs. 29.4%; P=.237). The difference between 90-day mortality in both groups was not statistically significant (2.8% LS vs. 4.3% OS; P=.546). The differences were maintained in the multivariate models.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic surgery within a multimodal rehabilitation program increases operative time but significantly decreases intraoperative bleeding, transfusion requirements, postoperative length of stay, and complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根治性膀胱切除术多模式康复方案中腹腔镜手术的影响。
导言和目的在根治性膀胱切除术中实施术后增强康复(ERAS)多模式康复方案已被证明可改善住院时间和并发症的治疗效果。本分析旨在评估腹腔镜手术对多模式康复计划中根治性膀胱切除术的影响。材料和方法该研究于2011年至2020年间在一家三级中心进行,包括根据ERAS(术后强化康复)方案和西班牙多模式康复小组(GERM)的20项要求接受根治性膀胱切除术的膀胱癌患者。结果 整个研究期间共进行了250例根治性膀胱切除术,其中42.8%采用开放手术(OS),57.2%采用腹腔镜手术(LS)。两组在人口统计学和临床变量方面具有可比性(P> .05)。LS 组的手术时间更长(248.4 ± 55.0 分钟对 286.2 ± 51.9 分钟;P< .001)。然而,LS 组的出血量(417.5 ± 365.7 对 877.9 ± 529.7 cc;P<;.001)和输血需求(33.6% 对 58.9%;P<;.001)明显较低。该组患者的术后住院时间(11.5 ± 10.5 对 20.1 ± 17.2 天;P< .001)、总并发症和主要并发症也显著减少(LS)。LS组的再入院率较低,但并不明显(36.4% vs. 29.4%;P=.237)。两组的90天死亡率差异无统计学意义(2.8% LS vs. 4.3% OS;P=.546)。结论在多模式康复计划内进行腹腔镜手术会增加手术时间,但会显著减少术中出血、输血需求、术后住院时间和并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Actas urologicas espanolas
Actas urologicas espanolas UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Actas Urológicas Españolas is an international journal dedicated to urological diseases and renal transplant. It has been the official publication of the Spanish Urology Association since 1974 and of the American Urology Confederation since 2008. Its articles cover all aspects related to urology. Actas Urológicas Españolas, governed by the peer review system (double blinded), is published online in Spanish and English. Consequently, manuscripts may be sent in Spanish or English and bidirectional free cost translation will be provided.
期刊最新文献
El leaking pipeline y las brechas de género en Urología Controversias en el abordaje del cáncer de próstata: consenso de recomendaciones de expertos del norte de España Hacia el cribado poblacional del cáncer de próstata en España Evaluación de los cambios en la función sexual en pacientes sometidos a cirugía endoscópica de la litiasis del tracto urinario superior Producción científica en urología: un análisis bibliométrico de 20 años en Latinoamérica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1