EvaluMate: Using AI to support students’ feedback provision in peer assessment for writing

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessing Writing Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100864
Kai Guo
{"title":"EvaluMate: Using AI to support students’ feedback provision in peer assessment for writing","authors":"Kai Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2024.100864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Peer feedback plays an important role in promoting learning in the writing classroom. However, providing high-quality feedback can be demanding for student reviewers. To address this challenge, this article proposes an AI-enhanced approach to peer feedback provision. I introduce EvaluMate, a newly developed online peer review system that leverages ChatGPT, a large language model (LLM), to scaffold student reviewers’ feedback generation. I discuss the design and functionality of EvaluMate, highlighting its affordances in supporting student reviewers’ provision of comments on peers’ essays. I also address the system’s limitations and propose potential solutions. Furthermore, I recommend future research on students’ engagement with this learning approach and its impact on learning outcomes. By presenting EvaluMate, I aim to inspire researchers and practitioners to explore the potential of AI technology in the teaching, learning, and assessment of writing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 100864"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293524000576","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peer feedback plays an important role in promoting learning in the writing classroom. However, providing high-quality feedback can be demanding for student reviewers. To address this challenge, this article proposes an AI-enhanced approach to peer feedback provision. I introduce EvaluMate, a newly developed online peer review system that leverages ChatGPT, a large language model (LLM), to scaffold student reviewers’ feedback generation. I discuss the design and functionality of EvaluMate, highlighting its affordances in supporting student reviewers’ provision of comments on peers’ essays. I also address the system’s limitations and propose potential solutions. Furthermore, I recommend future research on students’ engagement with this learning approach and its impact on learning outcomes. By presenting EvaluMate, I aim to inspire researchers and practitioners to explore the potential of AI technology in the teaching, learning, and assessment of writing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EvaluMate:使用人工智能支持学生在写作互评中提供反馈
同行反馈在促进写作课堂学习方面发挥着重要作用。然而,提供高质量的反馈对学生审阅者来说要求很高。为了应对这一挑战,本文提出了一种人工智能增强型同伴反馈方法。我介绍了新开发的在线互评系统 EvaluMate,它利用大型语言模型(LLM) ChatGPT 来帮助学生审稿人生成反馈。我讨论了 EvaluMate 的设计和功能,强调了它在支持学生评阅者对同行论文提供评论方面的能力。我还讨论了该系统的局限性,并提出了潜在的解决方案。此外,我还建议今后就学生参与这种学习方法及其对学习成果的影响开展研究。通过介绍 EvaluMate,我希望激励研究人员和从业人员探索人工智能技术在写作教学、学习和评估方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of voice in Chinese English-major undergraduates’ timed and untimed argument writing The impact of task duration on the scoring of independent writing responses of adult L2-English writers A structural equation investigation of linguistic features as indices of writing quality in assessed secondary-level EMI learners’ scientific reports Detecting and assessing AI-generated and human-produced texts: The case of second language writing teachers Validating an integrated reading-into-writing scale with trained university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1