The Nurse-Patient Relationship in Nursing Documentation: The Scope and Quality of Interactions and Prevalent Interventions in Inpatient Mental Health Units

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Nursing Management Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1155/2024/7392388
Alonso Pérez-Toribio, Antonio R. Moreno-Poyato, María Teresa Lluch-Canut, Khadija El-Abidi, Gema Rubia-Ruiz, Ana María Rodríguez-López, Juan J. Pérez-Moreno, Marcelino Vicente Pastor-Bernabeu, Sara Sánchez-Balcells, Ana Ventosa-Ruiz, Montserrat Puig-Llobet, Juan F. Roldán-Merino
{"title":"The Nurse-Patient Relationship in Nursing Documentation: The Scope and Quality of Interactions and Prevalent Interventions in Inpatient Mental Health Units","authors":"Alonso Pérez-Toribio,&nbsp;Antonio R. Moreno-Poyato,&nbsp;María Teresa Lluch-Canut,&nbsp;Khadija El-Abidi,&nbsp;Gema Rubia-Ruiz,&nbsp;Ana María Rodríguez-López,&nbsp;Juan J. Pérez-Moreno,&nbsp;Marcelino Vicente Pastor-Bernabeu,&nbsp;Sara Sánchez-Balcells,&nbsp;Ana Ventosa-Ruiz,&nbsp;Montserrat Puig-Llobet,&nbsp;Juan F. Roldán-Merino","doi":"10.1155/2024/7392388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Aims</i>. (i) To evaluate the scope and quality of nurse-patient interactions recorded in the clinical notes of inpatient mental health units and (ii) to identify nursing interventions recorded in the context of the nurse-patient relationship in the clinical notes of inpatient mental health units. <i>Design</i>. A multimethod approach was use. <i>Methods</i>. Employing a quantitative cross-sectional design for the first aim, and a qualitative content analysis design of secondary data for the second aim. In total, 1,714 clinical notes were examined from 44 randomly selected patients who were hospitalized in five mental health units over the years 2022-2023. <i>Results</i>. The patient’s experience of the interaction was present in 69.9% (<i>n</i> = 1,198) of the notes. However, only 12.0% (<i>n</i> = 205) of the notes reached a sufficient standard of quality in terms of describing the nurse-patient interactions. Specifically, more than half of the notes did not reflect any type of nursing intervention (<i>n</i> = 723; 60.4%). Thirty interventions compatible with the nursing intervention classification were identified, of which more than 70% corresponded to domains in the physiological area. <i>Conclusion</i>. This study shows that the quantity and scope of patients’ clinical notes in mental health units do not sufficiently reflect the interventions performed by nurses, nor the quality or impact of these interventions in the context of the nurse-patient therapeutic relationship. <i>Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care</i>. Improving the quality of clinical notes by integrating interventions and their impact can increase the quality of nursing care. <i>Impact</i>. The use of standardized nursing terminologies would contribute to the understanding of the extent and quality of nurse-patient interactions recorded in clinical notes. Thus, standardized documentation would also help to improve these interactions and their recording, which will facilitate decision-making. <i>Reporting Method</i>. Findings were reported using COREQ and STROBE guidelines. <i>Patient or Public Contributions</i>. There were no patient or public contributions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/7392388","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7392388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims. (i) To evaluate the scope and quality of nurse-patient interactions recorded in the clinical notes of inpatient mental health units and (ii) to identify nursing interventions recorded in the context of the nurse-patient relationship in the clinical notes of inpatient mental health units. Design. A multimethod approach was use. Methods. Employing a quantitative cross-sectional design for the first aim, and a qualitative content analysis design of secondary data for the second aim. In total, 1,714 clinical notes were examined from 44 randomly selected patients who were hospitalized in five mental health units over the years 2022-2023. Results. The patient’s experience of the interaction was present in 69.9% (n = 1,198) of the notes. However, only 12.0% (n = 205) of the notes reached a sufficient standard of quality in terms of describing the nurse-patient interactions. Specifically, more than half of the notes did not reflect any type of nursing intervention (n = 723; 60.4%). Thirty interventions compatible with the nursing intervention classification were identified, of which more than 70% corresponded to domains in the physiological area. Conclusion. This study shows that the quantity and scope of patients’ clinical notes in mental health units do not sufficiently reflect the interventions performed by nurses, nor the quality or impact of these interventions in the context of the nurse-patient therapeutic relationship. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care. Improving the quality of clinical notes by integrating interventions and their impact can increase the quality of nursing care. Impact. The use of standardized nursing terminologies would contribute to the understanding of the extent and quality of nurse-patient interactions recorded in clinical notes. Thus, standardized documentation would also help to improve these interactions and their recording, which will facilitate decision-making. Reporting Method. Findings were reported using COREQ and STROBE guidelines. Patient or Public Contributions. There were no patient or public contributions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理文件中的护患关系:住院精神健康病房中互动的范围和质量以及普遍的干预措施
目的:(i) 评估精神科住院病人临床笔记中记录的护患互动的范围和质量;(ii) 确定精神科住院病人临床笔记中记录的护患关系背景下的护理干预措施。设计。采用多种方法。方法。第一个目标采用横断面定量设计,第二个目标采用二手数据内容定性分析设计。在 2022 年至 2023 年期间,对随机抽取的 44 名在五家精神卫生单位住院的患者的 1714 份临床记录进行了研究。研究结果69.9%(n = 1,198)的病历中记录了患者的互动体验。然而,只有 12.0%(n = 205)的记录在描述护患互动方面达到了足够的质量标准。具体来说,一半以上的记录未反映任何类型的护理干预(n = 723;60.4%)。有 30 项干预符合护理干预分类,其中 70% 以上与生理领域相关。结论本研究表明,精神卫生科患者临床笔记的数量和范围并不能充分反映护士所采取的干预措施,也不能充分反映这些干预措施在护患治疗关系中的质量或影响。对行业和/或患者护理的影响。通过整合干预措施及其影响来提高临床病历的质量,可以提高护理质量。影响。使用标准化护理术语有助于了解临床笔记中记录的护患互动的程度和质量。因此,标准化的记录也有助于改善这些互动及其记录,从而促进决策的制定。报告方法。采用 COREQ 和 STROBE 指南报告研究结果。患者或公众贡献。无患者或公众贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
期刊最新文献
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Swedish Primary Healthcare Nurses’ Discontent With Their Current Job Determinants of First-Line Nurse Managers’ Span of Control: A Delphi Study The Impact of Medical Explainable Artificial Intelligence on Nurses’ Innovation Behaviour: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach Exploring the Influence of Demographic Factors and Flourishing on Workplace Distractions: A Cross-Country Analysis Identifying Accessibility and Equity Defects of Elderly Care Services in Developing Countries: Insights From Xiamen City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1