Impact of Left Atrial Pressure on Outcomes After Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014055
Yasser M Sammour, Rody G Bou Chaaya, Taha Hatab, Syed Zaid, Joe Aoun, Omar M Makram, Priscilla Wessly, Sahar Samimi, Sherif F Nagueh, William A Zoghbi, Marvin D Atkins, Michael J Reardon, Nadeen Faza, Stephen H Little, Neal S Kleiman, Sachin S Goel
{"title":"Impact of Left Atrial Pressure on Outcomes After Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.","authors":"Yasser M Sammour, Rody G Bou Chaaya, Taha Hatab, Syed Zaid, Joe Aoun, Omar M Makram, Priscilla Wessly, Sahar Samimi, Sherif F Nagueh, William A Zoghbi, Marvin D Atkins, Michael J Reardon, Nadeen Faza, Stephen H Little, Neal S Kleiman, Sachin S Goel","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased left atrial pressure (LAP) has been associated with adverse outcomes after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER). We sought to evaluate outcomes based on differences in postprocedural LAP measured after the final clip deployment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included consecutive patients who underwent M-TEER at our institution between 2014 and 2022 with LAP monitoring. Patients were stratified into 3 groups according to tertiles of post-TEER mean LAP. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 273 patients (mean age, 76.8±10.8 years; 42.5% women; 78.4% White). The mean post-TEER LAP was 8.7±1.7 mm Hg in tertile 1 (n=85), 14.4±1.6 mm Hg in tertile 2 (n=95), and 21.9±3.8 mm Hg in tertile 3 (n=93). In comparison with tertile 1, both tertiles 2 and 3 were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization at 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR], 2.27 [95% CI, 1.25-4.12] and adjHR, 3.00 [95% CI, 1.59-5.64], respectively). Among patients with primary mitral regurgitation, higher LAP was associated with increased risk of 2-year all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization (tertile 2 versus 1: adjHR, 3.00 [95% CI, 1.37-6.56]; tertile 3 versus 1: adjHR, 5.52 [95% CI, 2.04-14.95]). However, in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation, neither being in tertile 2 (adjHR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.55-4.24]) nor tertile 3 (adjHR, 2.18 [95% CI, 0.82-5.77]) were associated with the composite outcome compared with tertile 1. Any degree of LAP reduction following M-TEER was associated with lower mortality or heart failure hospitalization compared with no LAP reduction (adjHR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39-0.88]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated LAP after M-TEER was associated with increased 2-year risk of mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Exploration of reasons for elevated LAP after M-TEER and ways to lower it warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e014055"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014055","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increased left atrial pressure (LAP) has been associated with adverse outcomes after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER). We sought to evaluate outcomes based on differences in postprocedural LAP measured after the final clip deployment.

Methods: We included consecutive patients who underwent M-TEER at our institution between 2014 and 2022 with LAP monitoring. Patients were stratified into 3 groups according to tertiles of post-TEER mean LAP. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: We included 273 patients (mean age, 76.8±10.8 years; 42.5% women; 78.4% White). The mean post-TEER LAP was 8.7±1.7 mm Hg in tertile 1 (n=85), 14.4±1.6 mm Hg in tertile 2 (n=95), and 21.9±3.8 mm Hg in tertile 3 (n=93). In comparison with tertile 1, both tertiles 2 and 3 were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization at 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR], 2.27 [95% CI, 1.25-4.12] and adjHR, 3.00 [95% CI, 1.59-5.64], respectively). Among patients with primary mitral regurgitation, higher LAP was associated with increased risk of 2-year all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization (tertile 2 versus 1: adjHR, 3.00 [95% CI, 1.37-6.56]; tertile 3 versus 1: adjHR, 5.52 [95% CI, 2.04-14.95]). However, in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation, neither being in tertile 2 (adjHR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.55-4.24]) nor tertile 3 (adjHR, 2.18 [95% CI, 0.82-5.77]) were associated with the composite outcome compared with tertile 1. Any degree of LAP reduction following M-TEER was associated with lower mortality or heart failure hospitalization compared with no LAP reduction (adjHR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39-0.88]).

Conclusions: Elevated LAP after M-TEER was associated with increased 2-year risk of mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Exploration of reasons for elevated LAP after M-TEER and ways to lower it warrant further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二尖瓣经导管边对边修复术后左心房压力对预后的影响
背景:左心房压力(LAP)升高与二尖瓣经导管边缘到边缘修补术(M-TEER)后的不良预后有关。我们试图根据最终夹片部署后测量的术后 LAP 差异来评估预后。方法:我们纳入了 2014-2022 年间在我院接受 M-TEER 并接受 LAP 监测的连续患者。根据TEER术后平均LAP的三等分将患者分为3组。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析和 Cox 比例危险模型对结果进行评估。结果:我们共纳入了 273 名患者(平均年龄为 76.8±10.8 岁,42.5% 为女性,78.4% 为白种人)。分层 1(85 人)中,TEER 后 LAP 平均值为 8.7±1.7 mmHg;分层 2(95 人)中,LAP 平均值为 14.4±1.6 mmHg;分层 3(93 人)中,LAP 平均值为 21.9±3.8 mmHg。与三分层 1 相比,三分层 2 和三分层 3 与 2 年后全因死亡或心衰住院风险增加有关(adjHR 分别为 2.27,95% CI 1.25-4.12;adjHR 分别为 3.00,95% CI 1.59-5.64)。在原发性 MR 患者中,较高的 LAP 与 2 年全因死亡或心衰住院风险的增加有关(2 级与 1 级相比:adjHR 3.00,95% CI 1.37-6.56;3 级与 1 级相比:adjHR 5.52,95% CI 2.04-14.95)。然而,在继发性 MR 患者中,与三等分 1 相比,无论是三等分 2(adjHR 1.53;95% CI 0.55-4.24)还是三等分 3(adjHR 2.18;95% CI 0.82-5.77)都与综合结果无关。与未降低 LAP 相比,M-TEER 后任何程度的 LAP 降低均与较低的死亡率或心衰住院率相关(adjHR 0.59;95% CI 0.39-0.88)。结论M-TEER后LAP升高与2年死亡率或心衰住院风险增加有关。探索 M-TEER 后 LAP 升高的原因和降低 LAP 的方法值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
期刊最新文献
CTCA Prior to Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients With Previous Bypass Surgery: Patient-Related Outcomes, Imaging Resource Utilization, and Cardiac Events at 3 Years From the BYPASS-CTCA Trial. Invasive or CT Angiography: Alternative or Complementary Imaging Tools After CABG? Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the Evolut FX Self-Expanding Versus SAPIEN 3 Ultra Resilia Balloon-Expandable Valves. Transcatheter Interventions in Adults With Fontan Palliation. Contemporary Outcomes of TAVR Using a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Patients With Severe Mitral Stenosis: Insights From the Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1