Exploring the evolution of facial feminization and masculinization surgery: a bibliometric analysis and visualization study.

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1186/s40902-024-00424-x
Omer Uranbey, Omer Faruk Kaygisiz, Ferhat Ayrancı, Saim Yanik
{"title":"Exploring the evolution of facial feminization and masculinization surgery: a bibliometric analysis and visualization study.","authors":"Omer Uranbey, Omer Faruk Kaygisiz, Ferhat Ayrancı, Saim Yanik","doi":"10.1186/s40902-024-00424-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the current literature related to facial feminization surgery (FFS) and facial masculinization surgery (FMS) to understand the patterns, trends, and evolution of research topics. In addition, it aims to objectively identify the important articles that constitute the primary backbone of the FFS/FMS literature and provide a resource for education and new studies in this emerging field.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the principles of the Leiden Manifesto, 384 publications from the Web of Science from 1987 to 2023 were analyzed. The analysis included cross-country collaboration, keyword trends, affiliations, co-citation networks, and clustering. The results showed an increasing trend in FFS/FMS publications, with the USA leading in both publications (n = 238) and citations (n = 2420). The most cited journal was the Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. The results indicate a high growth rate, with an H-index of 34 and an average citation of 11.41 per article. Co-occurrence analysis revealed evolving keywords such as \"forehead\" (n = 52) and \"quality of life\" (n = 44). The timeline view illustrated the terms reflecting current areas of interest such as #patient satisfaction and #gender-affirming care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveals the influence of countries, institutions, authors, and emerging trends, supporting the anticipation that FFS/FMS will be a critical field of study in the future. The findings contribute to understanding the global landscape of FFS/FMS research, facilitating informed decision-making for researchers, and clinicians in the field of maxillofacial surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11153480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-024-00424-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the current literature related to facial feminization surgery (FFS) and facial masculinization surgery (FMS) to understand the patterns, trends, and evolution of research topics. In addition, it aims to objectively identify the important articles that constitute the primary backbone of the FFS/FMS literature and provide a resource for education and new studies in this emerging field.

Results: Using the principles of the Leiden Manifesto, 384 publications from the Web of Science from 1987 to 2023 were analyzed. The analysis included cross-country collaboration, keyword trends, affiliations, co-citation networks, and clustering. The results showed an increasing trend in FFS/FMS publications, with the USA leading in both publications (n = 238) and citations (n = 2420). The most cited journal was the Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. The results indicate a high growth rate, with an H-index of 34 and an average citation of 11.41 per article. Co-occurrence analysis revealed evolving keywords such as "forehead" (n = 52) and "quality of life" (n = 44). The timeline view illustrated the terms reflecting current areas of interest such as #patient satisfaction and #gender-affirming care.

Conclusion: The study reveals the influence of countries, institutions, authors, and emerging trends, supporting the anticipation that FFS/FMS will be a critical field of study in the future. The findings contribute to understanding the global landscape of FFS/FMS research, facilitating informed decision-making for researchers, and clinicians in the field of maxillofacial surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索面部女性化和男性化手术的演变:文献计量分析和可视化研究。
背景:本研究旨在对当前与面部女性化手术(FFS)和面部男性化手术(FMS)相关的文献进行文献计量分析,以了解研究课题的模式、趋势和演变。此外,它还旨在客观地识别构成面部女性化手术/面部男性化手术文献主要骨干的重要文章,并为这一新兴领域的教育和新研究提供资源:结果:根据《莱顿宣言》的原则,对 1987 年至 2023 年《科学网》上的 384 篇出版物进行了分析。分析内容包括跨国合作、关键词趋势、从属关系、共引网络和聚类。结果显示,FFS/FMS 出版物呈上升趋势,其中美国的出版物(n = 238)和被引用次数(n = 2420)均居首位。被引用次数最多的期刊是《整形与重建外科杂志》。结果表明,该期刊的增长率很高,H 指数为 34,每篇文章的平均引用次数为 11.41。共现分析显示,"前额"(n = 52)和 "生活质量"(n = 44)等关键词不断发展。时间轴视图显示了反映当前关注领域的术语,如#患者满意度和#性别肯定护理:本研究揭示了国家、机构、作者和新兴趋势的影响,支持了对未来全科医学/FMS 将成为一个重要研究领域的预期。研究结果有助于了解全球颌面外科研究的现状,为颌面外科领域的研究人员和临床医生做出明智的决策提供了便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A retrospective epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures at a tertiary referral hospital in istanbul: a seven-year study of 1,757 patients. Egyptian patients with cleft lip: our experience with primary rhinoplasty. Volume changes in the contralateral submandibular gland following unilateral gland excision in oral cancer patients. Clinical outcomes of NBF gel application in managing mucositis associated with xerostomia. Changes in mandibular width and frontal-lower facial profile after orthognathic surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy with removal of internal bone interference in patients with class III skeletal malocclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1