Bispectral Index monitoring of palliative sedation for home withdrawal of tracheostomy ventilation: A case report.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1177/02692163241257580
Greg Barclay, Michael Barbato, Rachel Yerbury, Laura Harnish, Nilda Miranda
{"title":"Bispectral Index monitoring of palliative sedation for home withdrawal of tracheostomy ventilation: A case report.","authors":"Greg Barclay, Michael Barbato, Rachel Yerbury, Laura Harnish, Nilda Miranda","doi":"10.1177/02692163241257580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tracheostomy ventilation in motor neurone disease is an uncommon life-sustaining treatment. Best practice is having a plan for ventilation withdrawal, but the literature to guide practice is limited. Case reports have documented standard doses of opioids and benzodiazepines used for sedation in such cases.</p><p><strong>Case: </strong>A 49-year-old man was diagnosed with motor neurone disease in 2016. He commenced tracheostomy ventilation in 2018. In 2022 and 2023, planning was undertaken, at the patient's request, for withdrawal of tracheostomy ventilation at home, when he was no longer able to communicate with technology.</p><p><strong>Case planning: </strong>Planning included Bispectral Index monitoring prior to cessation of ventilation, ensuring this only occurred when deep sedation was achieved. After ventilation withdrawal in 2023, a retrospective review of medications given and his level of sedation on monitoring was undertaken, with family consent.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Ventilation withdrawal was initiated after deep sedation was achieved, 6 h after commencing subcutaneous infusions of morphine, midazolam, clonazepam and phenobarbital.</p><p><strong>Lessons: </strong>Doses required to achieve acceptable sedation exceeded literature reports. Achieving deep sedation was a longer than expected process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More research using an objective measure of sedation is required, as clinical assessment of sedation in this context is compromised.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241257580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tracheostomy ventilation in motor neurone disease is an uncommon life-sustaining treatment. Best practice is having a plan for ventilation withdrawal, but the literature to guide practice is limited. Case reports have documented standard doses of opioids and benzodiazepines used for sedation in such cases.

Case: A 49-year-old man was diagnosed with motor neurone disease in 2016. He commenced tracheostomy ventilation in 2018. In 2022 and 2023, planning was undertaken, at the patient's request, for withdrawal of tracheostomy ventilation at home, when he was no longer able to communicate with technology.

Case planning: Planning included Bispectral Index monitoring prior to cessation of ventilation, ensuring this only occurred when deep sedation was achieved. After ventilation withdrawal in 2023, a retrospective review of medications given and his level of sedation on monitoring was undertaken, with family consent.

Outcome: Ventilation withdrawal was initiated after deep sedation was achieved, 6 h after commencing subcutaneous infusions of morphine, midazolam, clonazepam and phenobarbital.

Lessons: Doses required to achieve acceptable sedation exceeded literature reports. Achieving deep sedation was a longer than expected process.

Conclusion: More research using an objective measure of sedation is required, as clinical assessment of sedation in this context is compromised.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双谱指数监测用于气管造口通气家庭撤机的缓和镇静剂:病例报告。
背景:运动神经元病的气管切开通气是一种不常见的维持生命的治疗方法。最佳做法是制定通气撤机计划,但指导实践的文献资料有限。病例报告记录了此类病例中用于镇静的阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物的标准剂量:一名 49 岁的男子于 2016 年被诊断患有运动神经元病。他于 2018 年开始气管切开通气。2022 年和 2023 年,在患者的要求下,制定了在家中撤除气管切开通气的计划,当时他已无法使用技术进行交流:病例规划:规划包括在停止通气前进行双光谱指数监测,确保只有在实现深度镇静后才会停止通气。2023 年撤除通气后,在征得家属同意后,对所给药物和监测到的镇静水平进行了回顾性审查:在开始皮下注射吗啡、咪达唑仑、氯硝西泮和苯巴比妥 6 小时后,达到深度镇静后开始撤机:教训:达到可接受的镇静所需的剂量超出了文献报道。达到深度镇静的过程比预期的要长:结论:需要使用镇静的客观测量方法进行更多研究,因为在这种情况下对镇静的临床评估受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Utilizing intricate care networks: An ethnography of patients and families navigating palliative care in a resource-limited setting. Definition and recommendations of advance care planning: A Delphi study in five Asian sectors. Pharmacological treatment of pain, dyspnea, death rattle, fever, nausea, and vomiting in the last days of life in older people: A systematic review. A pragmatic approach to selecting a grading system for clinical practice recommendations in palliative care. 'A good ending but not the end': Exploring family preparations surrounding a relative's death and the Afterlife - A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1