Efficacy of the omental roll-up technique in pancreaticojejunostomy to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-06-05 DOI:10.14701/ahbps.24-016
Sisira Jayaratnam, Cherring Tandup, Yashwant Raj Sakaray, Kailash ChKurdia, Ashish Gupta, Lileswar Kaman
{"title":"Efficacy of the omental roll-up technique in pancreaticojejunostomy to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.","authors":"Sisira Jayaratnam, Cherring Tandup, Yashwant Raj Sakaray, Kailash ChKurdia, Ashish Gupta, Lileswar Kaman","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is being performed more frequently. A pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) leak is the major determinant of patient outcomes. An omental flap around PJ might improve postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled trial was planned at PGIMER, Chandigarh. Fifty-eight patients meeting the criteria were included in the study. Group A underwent PD with omental roll-up and group B underwent standard PD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients in group A was 57.1 ± 14.3 years and 51.2 ± 10.7 in group B. Jaundice (<i>p</i> = 0.667), abdominal pain (<i>p</i> = 0.69), and co-morbidities were equal among the groups. The body mass index of patients in group B was higher at 24.3 ± 5.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.03). The common bile duct diameter (12.6 ± 5.3 mm vs. 17.2 ± 10.3 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.13) and the pancreatic duct diameter (4.06 ± 2.01 mm vs. 4.60 ± 2.43 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.91) were comparable. The intraoperative blood loss (mL) was significantly higher in group B (233.33 ± 9.57 vs. 343.33 ± 177.14, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Drain fluid amylase levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 (<i>p</i> = 0.97) and POD3 (<i>p</i> = 0.92) were comparable. The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade A (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.99) and grade B (<i>p</i> = 0.54) were comparable. The mean postoperative length of stay among was similar (<i>p</i> = 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An omental wrap can be performed without increase in complexity of the procedure. However, its utility in preventing POPFs and morbidity remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is being performed more frequently. A pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) leak is the major determinant of patient outcomes. An omental flap around PJ might improve postoperative outcomes.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was planned at PGIMER, Chandigarh. Fifty-eight patients meeting the criteria were included in the study. Group A underwent PD with omental roll-up and group B underwent standard PD.

Results: The mean age of patients in group A was 57.1 ± 14.3 years and 51.2 ± 10.7 in group B. Jaundice (p = 0.667), abdominal pain (p = 0.69), and co-morbidities were equal among the groups. The body mass index of patients in group B was higher at 24.3 ± 5.4 kg/m2 (p = 0.03). The common bile duct diameter (12.6 ± 5.3 mm vs. 17.2 ± 10.3 mm, p = 0.13) and the pancreatic duct diameter (4.06 ± 2.01 mm vs. 4.60 ± 2.43 mm, p = 0.91) were comparable. The intraoperative blood loss (mL) was significantly higher in group B (233.33 ± 9.57 vs. 343.33 ± 177.14, p = 0.04). Drain fluid amylase levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 (p = 0.97) and POD3 (p = 0.92) were comparable. The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade A (p ≥ 0.99) and grade B (p = 0.54) were comparable. The mean postoperative length of stay among was similar (p = 0.89).

Conclusions: An omental wrap can be performed without increase in complexity of the procedure. However, its utility in preventing POPFs and morbidity remains unclear.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在胰十二指肠切除术后采用网膜卷起技术预防术后胰瘘的效果。
背景/目的:胰十二指肠切除术(PD)越来越频繁。胰空肠吻合术(PJ)渗漏是患者预后的主要决定因素。在胰空肠周围制作网膜瓣可能会改善术后效果:方法:计划在昌迪加尔的 PGIMER 进行一项前瞻性随机对照试验。符合标准的 58 名患者被纳入研究。结果:A组患者的平均年龄为18岁,B组患者的平均年龄为18岁:A组患者的平均年龄为(57.1±14.3)岁,B组患者的平均年龄为(51.2±10.7)岁。两组患者的黄疸(P = 0.667)、腹痛(P = 0.69)和并发症相同。B 组患者的体重指数较高,为 24.3 ± 5.4 kg/m2(p = 0.03)。总胆管直径(12.6 ± 5.3 mm vs. 17.2 ± 10.3 mm,p = 0.13)和胰管直径(4.06 ± 2.01 mm vs. 4.60 ± 2.43 mm,p = 0.91)相当。B 组的术中失血量(毫升)明显更高(233.33 ± 9.57 vs. 343.33 ± 177.14,p = 0.04)。术后第 1 天(POD)(P = 0.97)和第 3 天(P = 0.92)的引流液淀粉酶水平相当。术后胰瘘(POPF)A级(p ≥ 0.99)和B级(p = 0.54)的发生率相当。术后平均住院时间相似(p = 0.89):结论:网膜包裹术可以在不增加手术复杂性的情况下进行。结论:网膜包裹术可以在不增加手术复杂度的情况下进行,但其在预防 POPF 和发病率方面的作用仍不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-dimensional printing of intra-abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation: Correspondence. A rare case of a large solid pseudopapillary neoplasm with extensive liver metastasis. Improved graft survival by using three-dimensional printing of intra-abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation. ArtiSential® laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which minimally invasive surgery is better? Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy with combined venous vascular resection: A comparative analysis with open approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1